Exploration of registration and the risk of bias in acupuncture randomised controlled trials: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Duan, Yuting [1 ]
Deng, Yuening [1 ]
Tang, Binbin [2 ]
Xu, Zhirui [3 ]
Ye, Xiaolin [2 ]
Lu, Manyi [2 ]
Liu, Shujuan [1 ]
Xiong, Linghui [4 ]
Zhu, Weifeng [1 ]
Yu, Lin [1 ]
Zhao, Pinge [5 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated TCM Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Clin Sch Integrated Tradit Chinese & Western Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Brain Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[5] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Integrated Chinese & Western Med, Affiliated Brain Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Randomized Controlled Trial; China; COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE; Acupuncture;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083213
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the predominant type in acupuncture clinical research, and the publications have increased rapidly in recent years, but there is a prevalence of the high risk of bias and poor methodological design in acupuncture RCTs. Clinical trial registration can improve the transparency and credibility of studies by disclosing key information in advance. However, the registration in acupuncture RCTs is not satisfactory, as there is widespread of the under-registration, inconsistency with published studies and insufficient disclosure of key methodological information. Whether registration can reduce the risk of bias in acupuncture RCTs and improve data transparency has not been fully explored. Therefore, we constructed this study to investigate the association between registration and risk of bias and data sharing level in acupuncture RCTs.Methods Seven databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases will be systematically searched between 1 January 2014 and 31 March 2024, for acupuncture RCTs. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a predefined standardised format and perform secondary validation. The characteristics and data sharing level of the included studies will be summarised. The risk of bias of included RCTs will be assessed by the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials. The risk of bias and registration in acupuncture RCTs will be analysed by logistic or quantile regression analyses (depending on the number of minimum events). The data sharing level and registration will be analysed by quantile regression analyses.Ethics and dissemination As the systematic review aims to consolidate info from published sources, ethical approval is not necessary for this study. The study's findings will be submitted to a peer-reviewed academic journal and disseminated via conference presentations. This protocol has been registered in Open Science Framework Registries.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review
    Moffat, Keith R.
    Cannon, Paul
    Shi, Wen
    Sullivan, Frank
    [J]. TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [32] Reporting characteristics and risk of bias in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture analgesia published in PubMed-listed journals
    Li, Xiuxia
    Wang, Rong
    Shi, Xiue
    Chen, Zehao
    Pan, Yuanqing
    Li, Xusheng
    Yang, Kehu
    [J]. ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (04) : 259 - 267
  • [33] Risk of bias and methodological issues in randomised controlled trials of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
    Jia, Pengli
    Tang, Li
    Yu, Jiajie
    Lee, Andy H.
    Zhou, Xu
    Kang, Deying
    Luo, Yanan
    Liu, Jiali
    Sun, Xin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [34] Research Note: Evaluating risk of bias in randomised controlled trials
    Moseley, Anne M.
    Pinheiro, Marina B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2022, 68 (02) : 148 - 150
  • [35] A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
    El Feky, Adel
    Gillies, Katie
    Gardner, Heidi
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Treweek, Shaun
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [36] A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
    Gardner H.R.
    Fraser C.
    MacLennan G.
    Treweek S.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [37] A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
    Adel El Feky
    Katie Gillies
    Heidi Gardner
    Cynthia Fraser
    Shaun Treweek
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [38] Acupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Tae-Young Choi
    Myeong Soo Lee
    Tae-Hun Kim
    Christopher Zaslawski
    Edzard Ernst
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012, 20 : 1147 - 1158
  • [39] Acupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials
    Choi, Tae-Young
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    Kim, Tae-Hun
    Zaslawski, Christopher
    Ernst, Edzard
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (06) : 1147 - 1158
  • [40] Descriptions of sham acupuncture in randomised controlled trials: a critical review of the literature
    Yixuan Xie
    Xiaoyu Liu
    Tinglan Liu
    Chiyun Sun
    Zeyin Xin
    Yuzhi Hu
    Yue Wang
    Cheng Zhang
    Shiyan Yan
    [J]. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 23