A measles and rubella vaccine microneedle patch in The Gambia: a phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial

被引:21
|
作者
Adigweme, Ikechukwu [1 ]
Yisa, Mohammed [1 ]
Ooko, Michael [1 ]
Akpalu, Edem [1 ]
Bruce, Andrew [1 ]
Donkor, Simon [1 ]
Jarju, Lamin B. [1 ]
Danso, Baba [1 ]
Mendy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeffries, David [1 ]
Segonds-Pichon, Anne [1 ]
Njie, Abdoulie [1 ]
Crooke, Stephen [5 ]
El-Badry, Elina [5 ]
Johnstone, Hilary [2 ]
Royals, Michael [3 ]
Goodson, James L. [4 ]
Prausnitz, Mark R. [3 ]
McAllister, Devin, V [3 ]
Rota, Paul A. [5 ]
Henry, Sebastien [3 ]
Clarke, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Gambia London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Res Council Unit, Vaccines & Immun Theme, Banjul, Gambia
[2] HJ Clin Trial Consultancy, George, South Africa
[3] Micron Biomed, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Global Immunizat Div, Global Hlth Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Viral Dis, Natl Ctr Immunizat & Resp Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
LANCET | 2024年 / 403卷 / 110439期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
IMMUNIZATION ACTIVITIES; IMMUNOGENICITY; ELIMINATION; COVERAGE; PROGRESS; ROUTINE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00532-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Microneedle patches (MNPs) have been ranked as the highest global priority innovation for overcoming immunisation barriers in low-income and middle-income countries. This trial aimed to provide the first data on the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of a measles and rubella vaccine (MRV)-MNP in children. Methods This single -centre, phase 1/2, double -blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial was conducted in The Gambia. To be eligible, all participants had to be healthy according to prespecified criteria, aged 18-40 years for the adult cohort, 15-18 months for toddlers, or 9-10 months for infants, and to be available for visits throughout the follow-up period. The three age cohorts were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio (adults) or 1:1 ratio (toddlers and infants) to receive either an MRV-MNP (Micron Biomedical, Atlanta, GA, USA) and a placebo (0<middle dot>9% sodium chloride) subcutaneous injection, or a placebo-MNP and an MRV subcutaneous injection (MRV-SC; Serum Institute of India, Pune, India). Unmasked staff ransomly assigned the participants using an online application, and they prepared visually identical preparations of the MRV-MNP or placebo-MNP and MRV-SC or placebo -SC, but were not involved in collecting endpoint data. Staff administering the study interventions, participants, parents, and study staff assessing trial endpoints were masked to treatment allocation. The safety population consists of all vaccinated participants, and analysis was conducted according to route of MRV administration, irrespective of subsequent protocol deviations. The immunogenicity population consisted of all vaccinated participants who had a baseline and day 42 visit result available, and who had no protocol deviations considered to substantially affect the immunogenicity endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were collected for 14 days following vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events were collected to day 180. Age de-escalation between cohorts was based on the review of the safety data to day 14 by an independent data monitoring committee. Serum neutralising antibodies to measles and rubella were measured at baseline, day 42, and day 180. Analysis was descriptive and included safety events, seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean antibody concentrations. The trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202008836432905, and is complete. Findings Recruitment took place between May 18, 2021, and May 27, 2022. 45 adults, 120 toddlers, and 120 infants were randomly allocated and vaccinated. There were no safety concerns in the first 14 days following vaccination in either adults or toddlers, and age de-escalation proceeded accordingly. In infants, 93% (52/56; 95% CI 83<middle dot>0-97<middle dot>2) seroconverted to measles and 100% (58/58; 93<middle dot>8-100) seroconverted to rubella following MRV-MNP administration, while 90% (52/58; 79<middle dot>2-95<middle dot>2) and 100% (59/59; 93<middle dot>9-100) seroconverted to measles and rubella respectively, following MRV-SC. Induration at the MRV-MNP application site was the most frequent local reaction occurring in 46 (77%) of 60 toddlers and 39 (65%) of 60 infants. Related unsolicited adverse events, most commonly discolouration at the application site, were reported in 35 (58%) of 60 toddlers and 57 (95%) of 60 infants that had received the MRV-MNP. All local reactions were mild. There were no related severe or serious adverse events. Interpretation The safety and immunogenicity data support the accelerated development of the MRV-MNP. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:1879 / 1892
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of oral nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial
    Yuan, Jinyi
    Mo, Biwen
    Ma, Zhuang
    Lv, Yuan
    Cheng, Shih-Lung
    Yang, Yanping
    Tong, Zhaohui
    Wu, Renguang
    Sun, Shenghua
    Cao, Zhaolong
    Wu, Jufang
    Zhu, Demei
    Chang, Liwen
    Zhang, Yingyuan
    Zhao, Li
    Wang, Xiongbiao
    Wang, Xuefen
    Wang, Dexi
    Li, Xiangyang
    Peng, Yiqiang
    Liang, Yongjie
    Liu, Hua
    Xiao, Zuke
    Lv, Xiaoju
    Wu, Shiman
    Dai, Yuanrong
    Huang, Yijiang
    Hu, Zhenghong
    Qiu, Chen
    Li, Xi
    Zhang, Suiyang
    Li, Wenpu
    Liu, Shuang
    Shi, Yi
    Xiong, Chang
    Kuang, Jiulong
    Xiu, Qingyu
    Cui, Shehuai
    Li, Jianguo
    Lin, Qichang
    Huang, Wenxiang
    Wan, Yixin
    Li, Qimangu
    Shen, Ce
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Xiaoju
    Chuang, Yin Ching
    Perng, Wann Cherng
    Tsao, Shih-Ming
    Hsu, Jeng-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY IMMUNOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 52 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [32] Etrolizumab versus infliximab for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (GARDENIA): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study
    Danese, Silvio
    Colombel, Jean-Frederic
    Lukas, Milan
    Gisbert, Javier P.
    D'Haens, Geert
    Hayee, Bu'hussain
    Panaccione, Remo
    Kim, Hyun-Soo
    Reinisch, Walter
    Tyrrell, Helen
    Oh, Young S.
    Tole, Swati
    Chai, Akiko
    Chamberlain-James, Kirsten
    Tang, Meina Tao
    Schreiber, Stefan
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 7 (02): : 118 - 127
  • [33] Sacubitril-Valsartan in Pre-Clinical Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction; A Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Comparator, Clinical Trial
    Ledwidge, Mark I.
    Dodd, Jonathan
    Ryan, Fiona
    Sweeney, Claire
    Fox, Rebecca
    McDonald, Katherine
    Gallagher, Joseph
    Watson, Chris
    Murphy, David
    mcdonald, Kenneth
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144 (25) : E585 - E585
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of suanzaoren decoction for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: study protocol for randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial
    Zhou, Qi-Hui
    Wang, Hui-Lin
    Zhou, Xiao-Li
    Xu, Meng-Bei
    Zhang, Hong-feng
    Huang, Li-bo
    Zheng, Guo-qing
    Lin, Yan
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [35] Syzygium cumini (L.) skeels in the treatment of type 2 diabetes -: Results of a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial
    Teixeira, CC
    Weinert, LS
    Barbosa, DC
    Ricken, C
    Esteves, JF
    Fuchs, FD
    DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (12) : 3019 - 3020
  • [36] Randomised clinical trial: A double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tegoprazan in patients with gastric ulcer
    Choe, YoungHee
    Cho, YuKyung
    Lim, ChulHyun
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2020, 32
  • [37] The BouNDless Study: An Active-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Phase 3 Study of Continuous ND0612 Infusion in Patients with Parkinson's Disease Experiencing Motor Fluctuations
    Espay, Alberto
    Rascol, Olivier
    Yardeni, Tamar
    Adar, Liat
    Rosenfeld, Olivia
    Case, Ryan
    Olanow, C. Warren
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (15)
  • [38] Once daily versus three times daily mesalazine granules in active ulcerative colitis: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, non-inferiority trial
    Kruis, W.
    Kiudelis, G.
    Racz, I.
    Gorelov, I. A.
    Pokrotnieks, J.
    Horynski, M.
    Batovsky, M.
    Kykal, J.
    Boehm, S.
    Greinwald, R.
    Mueller, R.
    GUT, 2009, 58 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [39] Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-11 versus prednisolone in active Crohn's disease
    Herrlinger, K
    Witthoeft, T
    Raedler, A
    Bokemeyer, B
    Krummenerl, T
    Schulzke, J
    Boerner, N
    Kueppers, B
    Emmrich, J
    Mescheder, A
    Schwertschlag, U
    Shapiro, M
    Stange, E
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A466 - A466
  • [40] Indobufen versus aspirin in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (INSURE): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active control, non-inferiority trial
    Pan, Yuesong
    Meng, Xia
    Yuan, Baoshi
    Johnston, S. Claiborne
    Li, Hao
    Bath, Philip M.
    Dong, Qiang
    Xu, Anding
    Jing, Jing
    Lin, Jinxi
    Jiang, Yong
    Xie, Xuewei
    Jin, Aoming
    Suo, Yue
    Yang, Hongqin
    Feng, Yefang
    Zhou, Yanhua
    Liu, Qing
    Li, Xueli
    Liu, Bin
    Zhu, Hui
    Zhao, Jinguo
    Huang, Xuerong
    Li, Haitao
    Xiong, Yunyun
    Li, Zixiao
    Wang, Yilong
    Zhao, Xingquan
    Liu, Liping
    Wang, Yongjun
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2023, 22 (06): : 485 - 493