A measles and rubella vaccine microneedle patch in The Gambia: a phase 1/2, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial

被引:21
|
作者
Adigweme, Ikechukwu [1 ]
Yisa, Mohammed [1 ]
Ooko, Michael [1 ]
Akpalu, Edem [1 ]
Bruce, Andrew [1 ]
Donkor, Simon [1 ]
Jarju, Lamin B. [1 ]
Danso, Baba [1 ]
Mendy, Anthony [1 ]
Jeffries, David [1 ]
Segonds-Pichon, Anne [1 ]
Njie, Abdoulie [1 ]
Crooke, Stephen [5 ]
El-Badry, Elina [5 ]
Johnstone, Hilary [2 ]
Royals, Michael [3 ]
Goodson, James L. [4 ]
Prausnitz, Mark R. [3 ]
McAllister, Devin, V [3 ]
Rota, Paul A. [5 ]
Henry, Sebastien [3 ]
Clarke, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Gambia London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Med Res Council Unit, Vaccines & Immun Theme, Banjul, Gambia
[2] HJ Clin Trial Consultancy, George, South Africa
[3] Micron Biomed, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Global Immunizat Div, Global Hlth Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Viral Dis, Natl Ctr Immunizat & Resp Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
LANCET | 2024年 / 403卷 / 110439期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
IMMUNIZATION ACTIVITIES; IMMUNOGENICITY; ELIMINATION; COVERAGE; PROGRESS; ROUTINE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00532-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Microneedle patches (MNPs) have been ranked as the highest global priority innovation for overcoming immunisation barriers in low-income and middle-income countries. This trial aimed to provide the first data on the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of a measles and rubella vaccine (MRV)-MNP in children. Methods This single -centre, phase 1/2, double -blind, double-dummy, randomised, active-controlled, age de-escalation trial was conducted in The Gambia. To be eligible, all participants had to be healthy according to prespecified criteria, aged 18-40 years for the adult cohort, 15-18 months for toddlers, or 9-10 months for infants, and to be available for visits throughout the follow-up period. The three age cohorts were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio (adults) or 1:1 ratio (toddlers and infants) to receive either an MRV-MNP (Micron Biomedical, Atlanta, GA, USA) and a placebo (0<middle dot>9% sodium chloride) subcutaneous injection, or a placebo-MNP and an MRV subcutaneous injection (MRV-SC; Serum Institute of India, Pune, India). Unmasked staff ransomly assigned the participants using an online application, and they prepared visually identical preparations of the MRV-MNP or placebo-MNP and MRV-SC or placebo -SC, but were not involved in collecting endpoint data. Staff administering the study interventions, participants, parents, and study staff assessing trial endpoints were masked to treatment allocation. The safety population consists of all vaccinated participants, and analysis was conducted according to route of MRV administration, irrespective of subsequent protocol deviations. The immunogenicity population consisted of all vaccinated participants who had a baseline and day 42 visit result available, and who had no protocol deviations considered to substantially affect the immunogenicity endpoints. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were collected for 14 days following vaccination. Unsolicited adverse events were collected to day 180. Age de-escalation between cohorts was based on the review of the safety data to day 14 by an independent data monitoring committee. Serum neutralising antibodies to measles and rubella were measured at baseline, day 42, and day 180. Analysis was descriptive and included safety events, seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean antibody concentrations. The trial was registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202008836432905, and is complete. Findings Recruitment took place between May 18, 2021, and May 27, 2022. 45 adults, 120 toddlers, and 120 infants were randomly allocated and vaccinated. There were no safety concerns in the first 14 days following vaccination in either adults or toddlers, and age de-escalation proceeded accordingly. In infants, 93% (52/56; 95% CI 83<middle dot>0-97<middle dot>2) seroconverted to measles and 100% (58/58; 93<middle dot>8-100) seroconverted to rubella following MRV-MNP administration, while 90% (52/58; 79<middle dot>2-95<middle dot>2) and 100% (59/59; 93<middle dot>9-100) seroconverted to measles and rubella respectively, following MRV-SC. Induration at the MRV-MNP application site was the most frequent local reaction occurring in 46 (77%) of 60 toddlers and 39 (65%) of 60 infants. Related unsolicited adverse events, most commonly discolouration at the application site, were reported in 35 (58%) of 60 toddlers and 57 (95%) of 60 infants that had received the MRV-MNP. All local reactions were mild. There were no related severe or serious adverse events. Interpretation The safety and immunogenicity data support the accelerated development of the MRV-MNP. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:1879 / 1892
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NW Low-Glu® in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Assaad-Khalil, Samir
    Elkafrawy, Nabil
    Khaled, Mohsen
    Mogeib, Omneya
    Badr, Hytham
    Rashwan, Ahmed
    Youssef, Mahmoud
    Eltamawy, Khaled
    Mohamed, Shahnaz
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [22] ImmunoSep (Personalised Immunotherapy in Sepsis) international double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial: study protocol
    Kotsaki, Antigone
    Pickkers, Peter
    Bauer, Michael
    Calandra, Thierry
    Lupse, Mihaela
    Wiersinga, W. Joost
    Meylan, Sylvain
    Bloos, Frank
    van der Poll, Tom
    Slim, Marleen A.
    van Mourik, Niels
    Muller, Marcella C. A.
    van Vught, Lonneke
    Vlaar, Alexander P. J.
    de Nooijer, Aline
    Bakkerus, Lieke
    Weis, Sebastian
    Antonakos, Nikolaos
    Netea, Mihai G.
    Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12): : e067251
  • [23] Rezafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (ReSTORE) : a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial
    Thompson III, George R.
    Soriano, Alex
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Kullberg, Bart Jan
    Kollef, Marin
    Vazquez, Jose
    Honore, Patrick M.
    Bassetti, Matteo
    Pullman, John
    Chayakulkeeree, Methee
    Poromanski, Ivan
    Dignani, Cecilia
    Das, Anita F.
    Sandison, Taylor
    Pappas, Peter G.
    LANCET, 2023, 401 (10370): : 49 - 59
  • [24] BouNDless: An active-controlled randomized, double-blind double-dummy study of continuous ND0612 infusion in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease
    Poewe, W.
    Kieburtz, K.
    Stocchi, F.
    Oren, S.
    Yardeni, T.
    Adar, L.
    Rosenfeld, O.
    Olanow, C.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2019, 34 : S74 - S74
  • [25] Safety and Efficacy of WC2031 Versus Vibramycin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Randomized, Double-blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Trial
    Geisler, William M.
    Koltun, William D.
    Abdelsayed, Nader
    Burigo, John
    Mena, Leandro
    Taylor, Stephanie N.
    Batteiger, Byron E.
    Thurman, Andrea R.
    Hook, Edward W., III
    Vaughn, Toby A.
    Annett, Miriam P.
    Muenzen, Ruth A.
    Caminis, John
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 (01) : 82 - 88
  • [26] Zoledronic acid and risedronate in the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (HORIZON): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial
    Reid, David M.
    Devogelaer, Jean-Pierre
    Saag, Kenneth
    Roux, Christian
    Lau, Chak-Sing
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Papanastasiou, Philemon
    Ferreira, Alberto
    Hartl, Florian
    Fashola, Taiwo
    Mesenbrink, Peter
    Sambrook, Philip N.
    LANCET, 2009, 373 (9671): : 1253 - 1263
  • [27] Once versus three times daily dosing of oral budesonide for active Crohn's disease: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomised trial
    Dignass, Axel
    Stoynov, Simeon
    Dorofeyev, Andrey E.
    Grigorieva, Galina A.
    Tormova, Eva
    Altorjay, Istvan
    Tuculanu, Daniel
    Bunganic, Ivan
    Pokrotnieks, Juris
    Kupcinskas, Limas
    Dilger, Karin
    Greinwald, Roland
    Mueller, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2014, 8 (09): : 970 - 980
  • [28] Intravenous versus oral paracetamol for acute pain in adults in the emergency department setting: a prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial
    Furyk, Jeremy
    Levas, Deahnne
    Close, Benjamin
    Laspina, Kathryn
    Fitzpatrick, Meghan
    Robinson, Kelvin
    Vangaveti, Venkat N.
    Ray, Robin
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (03) : 163 - +
  • [29] Comparison of topiroxostat and allopurinol in Japanese hyperuricemic patients with or without gout: a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study
    Hosoya, T.
    Ogawa, Y.
    Hashimoto, H.
    Ohashi, T.
    Sakamoto, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 41 (03) : 290 - 297
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of switching from sitagliptin to liraglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes (LIRA-SWITCH): a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled 26-week trial
    Bailey, T. S.
    Takacs, R.
    Tinahones, F. J.
    Rao, P. V.
    Tsoukas, G. M.
    Thomsen, A. B.
    Kaltoft, M. S.
    Maislos, M.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (12): : 1191 - 1198