Nuclear data uncertainty quantification analysis at Studsvik Scandpower

被引:0
|
作者
Hykes, J. [1 ]
Simeonov, T. [1 ]
Ferrer, R. [1 ]
Jonsson, C. [2 ]
Wemple, C. [1 ]
Eronen, V. -p. [5 ]
Ranta, T. [3 ]
Ranta-aho, A. [4 ]
Hynonen, V. [4 ]
Kumpula, J. [4 ]
Huttunen, J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Studsvik Scandpower Inc, 1070 Riverwalk Dr, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 USA
[2] Studsvik Scandpower AB, Badhusgatan 12, SE-72215 Vasteras, Sweden
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[4] Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Mikonkatu 7, FI-00100 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Posiva Oy, FI-27160 Eurajoki, Finland
关键词
CASMO5; HELIOS2; SNF; Uncertainty quantification; Uncertainty propagation; Covariance; Clab;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110752
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Studsvik Scandpower has recently added nuclear data uncertainty quantification to several of its tools, with the hope to provide user-friendly access to these methods to existing users of HELIOS2, CASMO5, and SNF. The lattice physics codes HELIOS2 and CASMO5 have been extended to perform the propagation of nuclear data cross section uncertainty using statistical sampling. HELIOS2 utilizes existing uncertainty data based on the SCALE/XSUSA 44-group covariance library. In contrast, for CASMO5, Studsvik generated a custom covariance library based primarily on ENDF/B-VIII using the cross section processing code NJOY/ERRORR. This paper presents the methods for constructing and applying these perturbations. The perturbations applied to the cross sections have been verified by comparing HELIOS2 and CASMO5 uncertainties using identical perturbation vectors. Furthermore, the UAM-1 benchmarks were applied for the BWR, PWR, and VVER pincells; in these cases, significant differences were observed due to the different covariance libraries. The uncertainties from HELIOS2 and CASMO5 are passed to SNF, which uses the isotopic uncertainties for the burned fuel to compute uncertainties on various backend quantities, such as decay heat and activity. The SNF UQ features are applied to the Clab decay heat measurements, where the predicted uncertainty of 1.8 % was close to the measurement-to-computed error with bias of 0.72 % and standard deviation of 1.49 %. Finally, the effect of the decay heat uncertainty is shown for a disposal canister loading scenario for more than 8000 BWR fuel assemblies from Olkiluoto 1 and 2. The decay heat uncertainty imposes a similar to 1 % decay heat power safety margin in the loading of the disposal canister.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncertainty quantification in the Nuclear Data Program
    Brown, D. A.
    Herman, M.
    Hoblit, S.
    McCutchan, E. A.
    Nobre, G. P. A.
    Pritychenko, B.
    Sonzogni, A. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (03)
  • [2] Uncertainty Quantification, Sensitivity Analysis, and Data Assimilation for Nuclear Systems Simulation
    Abdel-Khalik, H.
    Turinsky, P.
    Jessee, M.
    Elkins, J.
    Stover, T.
    Iqbal, M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2008, 109 (12) : 2785 - 2790
  • [3] Evaluation of sampling methods for nuclear data uncertainty quantification
    Zou, Xiaoyang
    Wan, Chenghui
    Cao, Liangzhi
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 200
  • [4] Nuclear Data Uncertainty Quantification: Past, Present and Future
    Smith, D. L.
    [J]. NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2015, 123 : 1 - 7
  • [5] Nuclear data uncertainty quantification on PWR spent nuclear fuel as a function of burnup
    Grimaldi, Federico
    Romojaro, Pablo
    Fiorito, Luca
    Belfiore, Enrica
    Bruggeman, Christophe
    Dulla, Sandra
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 11
  • [6] Nuclear data uncertainty quantification on PWR spent nuclear fuel as a function of burnup
    SCK CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Mol, Belgium
    不详
    [J]. Front. Energy Res.,
  • [7] Statistical Considerations in Data Analysis and Quantification of Uncertainty
    Fuentes, C.
    [J]. BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH, 2022, 114 (09): : 363 - 363
  • [8] Nuclear Data Uncertainty Quantification and Propagation for Safety Analysis of Lead-Cooled Fast Reactors
    Trivedi, Ishita
    Hou, Jason
    Grasso, Giacomo
    Ivanov, Kostadin
    Franceschini, Fausto
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, 2020, 2020
  • [9] Data Adequacy by an Extended Analytic Hierarchy Process for Inverse Uncertainty Quantification in Nuclear Safety Analysis
    Di Maio, Francesco
    Coscia, Thomas Matteo
    Zio, Enrico
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 419
  • [10] Subspace-based Inverse Uncertainty Quantification for Nuclear Data Assessment
    Khuwaileh, B. A.
    Abdel-Khalik, H. S.
    [J]. NUCLEAR DATA SHEETS, 2015, 123 : 57 - 61