Nuclear data uncertainty quantification analysis at Studsvik Scandpower

被引:0
|
作者
Hykes, J. [1 ]
Simeonov, T. [1 ]
Ferrer, R. [1 ]
Jonsson, C. [2 ]
Wemple, C. [1 ]
Eronen, V. -p. [5 ]
Ranta, T. [3 ]
Ranta-aho, A. [4 ]
Hynonen, V. [4 ]
Kumpula, J. [4 ]
Huttunen, J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Studsvik Scandpower Inc, 1070 Riverwalk Dr, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 USA
[2] Studsvik Scandpower AB, Badhusgatan 12, SE-72215 Vasteras, Sweden
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[4] Teollisuuden Voima Oyj, Mikonkatu 7, FI-00100 Helsinki, Finland
[5] Posiva Oy, FI-27160 Eurajoki, Finland
关键词
CASMO5; HELIOS2; SNF; Uncertainty quantification; Uncertainty propagation; Covariance; Clab;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110752
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Studsvik Scandpower has recently added nuclear data uncertainty quantification to several of its tools, with the hope to provide user-friendly access to these methods to existing users of HELIOS2, CASMO5, and SNF. The lattice physics codes HELIOS2 and CASMO5 have been extended to perform the propagation of nuclear data cross section uncertainty using statistical sampling. HELIOS2 utilizes existing uncertainty data based on the SCALE/XSUSA 44-group covariance library. In contrast, for CASMO5, Studsvik generated a custom covariance library based primarily on ENDF/B-VIII using the cross section processing code NJOY/ERRORR. This paper presents the methods for constructing and applying these perturbations. The perturbations applied to the cross sections have been verified by comparing HELIOS2 and CASMO5 uncertainties using identical perturbation vectors. Furthermore, the UAM-1 benchmarks were applied for the BWR, PWR, and VVER pincells; in these cases, significant differences were observed due to the different covariance libraries. The uncertainties from HELIOS2 and CASMO5 are passed to SNF, which uses the isotopic uncertainties for the burned fuel to compute uncertainties on various backend quantities, such as decay heat and activity. The SNF UQ features are applied to the Clab decay heat measurements, where the predicted uncertainty of 1.8 % was close to the measurement-to-computed error with bias of 0.72 % and standard deviation of 1.49 %. Finally, the effect of the decay heat uncertainty is shown for a disposal canister loading scenario for more than 8000 BWR fuel assemblies from Olkiluoto 1 and 2. The decay heat uncertainty imposes a similar to 1 % decay heat power safety margin in the loading of the disposal canister.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spectral analysis for uncertainty quantification
    Lee, Barry
    [J]. NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 28 (04)
  • [42] Methodology for core analyses with nuclear data uncertainty quantification and application to Swiss PWR operated cycles
    Leray, O.
    Ferroukhi, H.
    Hursin, M.
    Vasiliev, A.
    Rochman, D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 110 : 547 - 559
  • [43] Nuclear data-induced uncertainty quantification of neutronics parameters of accelerator-driven system
    Chiba, Go
    Pyeon, Cheol Ho
    van Rooijen, Wilfred
    Endo, Tomohiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 53 (10) : 1653 - 1661
  • [44] Uncertainty quantification and propagation in nuclear density functional theory
    Schunck, N.
    McDonnell, J. D.
    Higdon, D.
    Sarich, J.
    Wild, S. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL A, 2015, 51 (12): : 1 - 14
  • [45] Uncertainty-quantification-enabled inversion of nuclear responses
    Raghavan, Krishnan
    Lovato, Alessandro
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2024, 110 (02)
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification and propagation in nuclear density functional theory
    N. Schunck
    J. D. McDonnell
    D. Higdon
    J. Sarich
    S. M. Wild
    [J]. The European Physical Journal A, 2015, 51
  • [47] Uncertainty quantification in lattice QCD calculations for nuclear physics
    Beane, Silas R.
    Detmold, William
    Orginos, Kostas
    Savage, Martin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS G-NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (03)
  • [48] Uncertainty quantification and data consistency analysis for the development of hydrogen and syngas oxidation model
    Wang, Hongxin
    Huang, Gongrui
    Aizhan, Nugymanova
    Haidn, Oskar
    Slavinskaya, Nadja
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2024, 79 : 456 - 467
  • [49] A Functional Data Analysis Approach to Surrogate Modeling in Reservoir and Geomechanics Uncertainty Quantification
    Bottazzi, Francesca
    Della Rossa, Ernesto
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2017, 49 (04) : 517 - 540
  • [50] A Functional Data Analysis Approach to Surrogate Modeling in Reservoir and Geomechanics Uncertainty Quantification
    Francesca Bottazzi
    Ernesto Della Rossa
    [J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2017, 49 : 517 - 540