Nuclear data uncertainty quantification on PWR spent nuclear fuel as a function of burnup

被引:2
|
作者
Grimaldi, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Romojaro, Pablo [1 ]
Fiorito, Luca [1 ]
Belfiore, Enrica [2 ]
Bruggeman, Christophe [1 ]
Dulla, Sandra [2 ]
机构
[1] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, SCK CEN, Mol, Belgium
[2] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Energia, NEMO Grp, Turin, Italy
来源
关键词
burnup; spent nuclear fuel; nuclide inventory; uncertainty analysis; nuclear data; SANDY; model comparison; CROSS-SECTIONS; PROPAGATION; COVARIANCES; SCIENCE; YIELDS;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2023.1146598
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Nuclear data uncertainty analysis on the spent nuclear fuel inventory was performed on the Takahama-3 NT3G23 assembly, where the sample SF95-4 was irradiated up to a burnup of approximately 36 GWd/ t according to the SFCOMPO benchmark. The cross-section covariance matrices stored in the ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3 and JENDL-4.0u evaluated nuclear data libraries were propagated with the stochastic sampling algorithms implemented in the SANDY code. A comparison of the concentration uncertainty differences obtained using data from the three libraries is reported. Similarities were found with the fuel composition uncertainty results obtained for the Calvert Cliffs MKP109 sample P SFCOMPO benchmark. Such a similarity was also found when comparing concentration uncertainties along the sample irradiation. Therefore, the main contributors to the concentration uncertainty of a number of nuclides were identified at different burnup levels in the two samples. To complement the similarity analysis, a correlation study of the concentration distributions predicted by the two models was performed. The reported results hint a dominance of the common uncertainty propagation mechanisms over the model differences in the determination of concentration uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nuclear data uncertainty quantification on PWR spent nuclear fuel as a function of burnup
    SCK CEN, Belgian Nuclear Research Center, Mol, Belgium
    不详
    [J]. Front. Energy Res.,
  • [2] NUCLEAR DATA UNCERTAINTY PROPAGATION FOR A TYPICAL PWR FUEL ASSEMBLY WITH BURNUP
    Rochman, D.
    Sciolla, C. M.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 46 (03) : 353 - 362
  • [3] Nuclear Data Uncertainty Quantification in Criticality Safety Evaluations for Spent Nuclear Fuel Geological Disposal
    Frankl, Matthias
    Hursin, Mathieu
    Rochman, Dimitri
    Vasiliev, Alexander
    Ferroukhi, Hakim
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (14):
  • [4] Nuclear-data uncertainty propagations in burnup calculation for the PWR assembly
    Wan, Chenghui
    Cao, Liangzhi
    Wu, Hongchun
    Shen, Wei
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 100 : 20 - 31
  • [5] Investigation of the effect of fixed absorbers on the reactivity of PWR spent nuclear fuel for burnup credit
    Wagner, JC
    Sanders, CE
    [J]. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 139 (02) : 91 - 126
  • [6] Uncertainty quanti fi cation of PWR spent fuel due to nuclear data and modeling parameters
    Ebiwonjumi, Bamidele
    Kong, Chidong
    Zhang, Peng
    Cherezov, Alexey
    Lee, Deokjung
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (03) : 715 - 731
  • [7] A burnup credit methodology for PWR spent fuel storage pools: Application to a standard PWR nuclear power plant
    Castro, V. F.
    Miro, R.
    Pereira, C.
    Verdu, G.
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2024, 419
  • [8] Uncertainty quantification of spent nuclear fuel with multifidelity Monte Carlo
    Alba, Arnau
    Adelmann, Andreas
    Rochman, Dimitri
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 211
  • [9] Fast uncertainty quantification of spent nuclear fuel with neural networks
    Alba, Arnau
    Adelmann, Andreas
    Munster, Lucas
    Rochman, Dimitri
    Boiger, Romana
    [J]. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 196
  • [10] ACCOUNTING NUCLEAR FUEL BURNUP FOR CRITICALITY SAFETY JUSTIFICATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL STORAGES
    Solovyov, Vladislav
    Galchenko, Vitaliy
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 5, 2012, : 69 - 76