OPTIMAL CONTROL OF SPINE AND SHOULDER POWERED EXOSKELETONS FOR SQUAT LIFTING

被引:0
|
作者
Arefeen, Asif [1 ]
Xiang, Yujiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Mech & Aerosp Engn, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2023, VOL 2 | 2023年
关键词
Wearable robotics; powered exoskeleton; optimal control; and motion planning; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, a two-dimensional (2D) human skeletal model is used to predict the optimal lifting motion for the cases with and without exoskeletons using inverse dynamics optimization. The kinematics and dynamics of the human model were expressed in Denavit-Hartenberg (DH) representation. Furthermore, the electromechanical dynamics of the spine and shoulder exoskeletons' DC motors are modeled in the lifting optimization formulation. The design variables are human joint angle profiles and exoskeleton motor current profiles. The normalized human joint torque squared is minimized subject to physical and lifting task constraints. The optimization problem was solved by the gradient-based optimizer SNOPT. The comparison of the predicted human joint angle profiles, joint torque profiles, and ground reaction force (GRF) profiles are presented between lifting tasks with and without exoskeleton assistance. The optimal torques of the exoskeletons at the spine and shoulder joints are achieved by solving the lifting optimization problem, and it is observed that the proposed method has reduced the human joint torque magnitudes due to the exoskeletons' assistance. The peak values of the human spine and shoulder joint torque magnitudes decreased by 6.40% and 38.01% respectively, due to the exoskeleton assistance. However, human knee joint torque has slightly increased due to the extra weight of the exoskeletons.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ERECTOR SPINAE ACTIVATION AND MOVEMENT DYNAMICS ABOUT THE LUMBAR SPINE IN LORDOTIC AND KYPHOTIC SQUAT-LIFTING
    HOLMES, JA
    DAMASER, MS
    LEHMAN, SL
    SPINE, 1992, 17 (03) : 327 - 334
  • [22] The effects of protective footwear on spine control and lifting mechanics
    Mayor, Matthew P.
    Graham, Ryan B.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2019, 76 : 122 - 129
  • [23] Subject specific optimal control of powered knee exoskeleton to assist human lifting tasks under controlled environment
    Arefeen, Asif
    Xiang, Yujiang
    ROBOTICA, 2023, 41 (09) : 2809 - 2828
  • [24] Application of Wearable Sensors in Actuation and Control of Powered Ankle Exoskeletons: A Comprehensive Review
    Kian, Azadeh
    Widanapathirana, Giwantha
    Joseph, Anna M.
    Lai, Daniel T. H.
    Begg, Rezaul
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (06)
  • [25] Output feedback assistive control of single-DOF SEA powered exoskeletons
    Kardan, Iman
    Akbarzadeh, Alireza
    INDUSTRIAL ROBOT-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 2017, 44 (03): : 275 - 287
  • [26] Optimal Control of the Spine System
    Xu, Yunfei
    Choi, Jongeun
    Reeves, N. Peter
    Cholewicki, Jacek
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2010, 132 (05):
  • [27] OPTIMAL-CONTROL OF AN OFFSHORE LIFTING OPERATION
    MJELDE, KM
    LEE, PCS
    QVAM, W
    JACOBSEN, HP
    ROONEY, P
    TEGN, F
    MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 1984, 5 (02) : 123 - 128
  • [28] Biomechanics and energetics of walking in powered ankle exoskeletons using myoelectric control versus mechanically intrinsic control
    Koller, Jeffrey R.
    Remy, C. David
    Ferris, Daniel P.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 15
  • [29] Biomechanics and energetics of walking in powered ankle exoskeletons using myoelectric control versus mechanically intrinsic control
    Jeffrey R. Koller
    C. David Remy
    Daniel P. Ferris
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 15
  • [30] Optimal design of active-passive shoulder exoskeletons: a computational modeling of human-robot interaction
    Ali Nasr
    Sydney Bell
    John McPhee
    Multibody System Dynamics, 2023, 57 : 73 - 106