Utilization of Face-to-Face Vestibular Support Groups: A Comparison to Online Group Participation

被引:0
|
作者
Vanstrum, Erik B. [1 ]
Kim, Min Jung [2 ]
Ziltzer, Ryan S. [2 ,3 ]
Doherty, Joni K. [4 ]
Bassett, Alaina M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Head & Neck Surg, 10833 Le Conte Ave,CHS 62-235, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Caruso Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Calif State Univ, 5151 State Univ Dr, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA
来源
关键词
vestibular disorders; support groups; online support groups; face-to-face support groups; coping strategies; social support; HEALTH; CANCER; DEPRESSION; ATTITUDES; VERTIGO;
D O I
10.1177/00034894241241861
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: This study compared the utilization and outcomes of face-to-face (F2F) vestibular support groups and online support communities (OSC) for individuals with vestibular disorders. Methods: We distributed a 31-question anonymous electronic survey through the Vestibular Disorders Association (VeDA) to F2F participants, categorizing user involvement in F2F, OSCs, or both and assessed impact on medical decision-making, psychosocial benefits, and goals achieved. Results: The F2F cohort consisted of 97 individuals comprising primarily of non-Hispanic White women (mean age = 57 years, SD +/- 14 years) with diagnoses including persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (19%), Meniere's disease (15%), and vestibular neuritis (13%). Most participants were diagnosed by an otolaryngologist (65%) and attended F2F meetings monthly or less frequently (78%). The OSC group comprised of 551 individuals, primarily of non-Hispanic White women, but was younger in age (mean age = 50 years, SD +/- 13 years). OSC participants notably engaged more, with 36% participating on a daily basis and 32% multiple times a week. F2F participants were older (mean age 57 years vs 50 years, P < .001) and more commonly referred by medical professionals (22% F2F vs 6% OSC, P < .001). Both groups had similar achieved goals, including hearing from others with the same diagnosis (84% vs 89%, P > .05) and similar impact on medical decision-making (75% vs 78%, P > .05). More F2F participants reported increased development of coping skills (79% F2F vs 69% OSC, P = .037). OSC participants typically found the group via an online search (75%), compared to 51% for F2F. OSC participants had higher daily engagement (36%) compared to F2F (1%). Conclusion: F2F users are older and more commonly referred by medical professionals. Despite less frequent engagement, F2F participants reported similar influences on achieved goals, medical decision-making, and impact on psychosocial benefits. These findings highlight the importance of both F2F and OSC support groups for individuals with vestibular disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 719
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study
    Johannes Huber
    Tanja Muck
    Philipp Maatz
    Bastian Keck
    Paul Enders
    Imad Maatouk
    Andreas Ihrig
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2018, 12 : 1 - 9
  • [22] Emotional expression and facilitation of online vs. face-to-face breast cancer support groups
    Golant, M
    Lieberman, M
    Giese-Davis, J
    Winzelberg, A
    Ellis, W
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) : S18 - S19
  • [23] Enhancing the facilitation of online groups in higher education: a review of the literature on face-to-face and online group-facilitation
    Thomas, Glyn
    Thorpe, Stephen
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 27 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [24] Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in distance education
    Price, Linda
    Richardson, John T. E.
    Jelfs, Anne
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 32 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [25] Face-to-Face, or Online, That Is the Question
    Gao, Chunming
    Goda, Bryan
    [J]. SIGITE'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL SIG CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2018, : 60 - 60
  • [26] A comparison of face-to-face and online training in improving managers' confidence to support the mental health of workers
    Gayed, Aimee
    Tan, Leona
    LaMontagne, Anthony D.
    Milner, Allison
    Deady, Mark
    Milligan-Saville, Josie S.
    Madan, Ira
    Calvo, Rafael A.
    Christensen, Helen
    Mykletun, Arnstein
    Glozier, Nicholas
    Harvey, Samuel B.
    [J]. INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2019, 18
  • [27] A Comparison of Conversational Quality in Online and Face-to-Face First Encounters
    Lipinski-Harten, Maciek
    Tafarodi, Romin W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 31 (03) : 331 - 341
  • [28] Attitude moderation: A comparison of online chat and Face-to-face conversation
    Lipinski-Harten, Maciek
    Tafarodi, Romin W.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) : 2490 - 2493
  • [29] Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources
    Hsieh, Yi Chin
    [J]. RECALL, 2020, 32 (01) : 85 - 105
  • [30] FACE-TO-FACE GROUP WORKING
    Villar, Jose R.
    [J]. EDULEARN14: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, : 724 - 732