Forage peanut legume as a strategy for improving beef production without increasing livestock greenhouse gas emissions

被引:0
|
作者
Homem, B. G. C. [1 ,2 ]
Borges, L. P. C. [1 ]
de Lima, I. B. G. [1 ]
Guimaraes, B. C. [1 ]
Spasiani, P. P. [1 ]
Ferreira, I. M. [1 ]
Meo-Filho, P. [3 ]
Berndt, A. [3 ]
Alves, B. J. R. [2 ]
Urquiaga, S. [2 ]
Boddey, R. M. [4 ]
Casagrande, D. R. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Anim Sci, UFLA, BR-37200900 Lavras, MG, Brazil
[2] Embrapa Agrobiol, Rodovia BR 465,Km 7, BR-23897970 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Embrapa Southeast Livestock, Rodovia Washington Luiz,Km 234, BR-13560970 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rural Rio de Janeiro, Dept Soil Sci, Rodovia BR 465,Km 7, BR-23890000 Seropedica, RJ, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Anim Sci, Campus Univ,Caixa Postal 3037, BR-37200900 Lavras, MG, Brazil
关键词
Arachis pintoi; Forage legumes; Methane; Nitrogen fertiliser; Nitrous oxide; TILLER AGE CATEGORIES; METHANE EMISSIONS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; ENTERIC METHANE; NUTRITIVE-VALUE; GRASS; DIGESTIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; HERBAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2024.101158
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The transformation of pastures from a degraded state to sustainable productivity is a major challenge in tropical livestock production. Stoloniferous forage legumes such as Arachis pintoi (forage peanut) are one of the most promising alternatives for intensifying pasture-based beef livestock operations with reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This 2-year study assessed beef cattle performance, nutrient intake and digestibility, and balance of GHG emissions in three pasture types (PT): (1) mixed Palisade grass Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R.D. Webster (syn. Brachiaria brizantha Stapf cv. Marandu) and forage peanut (A. pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. cv. BRS Mandobi) pastures (Mixed), (2) monoculture Palisade grass pastures with 150 kg of N/ha per year (Fertilised), and (3) monoculture Palisade grass without N fertiliser (Control). Continuous stocking with a variable stocking rate was used in a randomised complete block design, with four replicates per treatment. The average daily gain and carcass gain were not influenced by the PT (P = 0.439 and P = 0.100, respectively) and were, on average, 0.433 kg/animal per day and 83.4 kg/animal, respectively. Fertilised and Mixed pastures increased by 102 and 31.5%, respectively, the liveweight gain per area (kg/ha/yr) compared to the Control pasture (P < 0.001). The heifers in the Mixed pasture had lower CH4 emissions (g/animal per day; P = 0.009), achieving a reduction of 12.6 and 10.1% when compared to the Fertilised and Control pastures, respectively. Annual (N2O) emissions (g/animal) and per kg carcass weight gain were 59.8 and 63.1% lower, respectively, in the Mixed pasture compared to the Fertilised pasture (P < 0.001). Mixed pasture mitigated approximately 23% of kg CO2eq/ kg of carcass when substituting 150 kg of N/ha per year via fertiliser. Mixed pastures with forage peanut are a promising solution to recover degraded tropical pastures by providing increased animal production with lower GHG emissions. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beef production and greenhouse gas emissions
    Avery, Alex
    Avery, Deirmis
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 116 (09) : A374 - A375
  • [2] Greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production systems
    Henry, Beverley
    Eckard, Richard
    [J]. TROPICAL GRASSLANDS, 2009, 43 : 232 - 238
  • [3] The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems
    Harrison, Matthew T.
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Tomkins, Nigel W.
    McSweeney, Chris
    Cohn, Philip
    Eckard, Richard J.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 370 - 384
  • [4] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production
    Weiske, A
    Petersen, SO
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 112 (2-3) : 105 - 106
  • [5] Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
    De Oliveira Silva R.
    Barioni L.G.
    Hall J.A.J.
    Folegatti Matsuura M.
    Zanett Albertini T.
    Fernandes F.A.
    Moran D.
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (5) : 493 - 497
  • [6] Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
    Silva, R. de Oliveira
    Barioni, L. G.
    Hall, J. A. J.
    Matsuura, M. Folegatti
    Albertini, T. Zanett
    Fernandes, F. A.
    Moran, D.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (05) : 493 - +
  • [7] Improving livestock production efficiencies presents a major opportunity to reduce sectoral greenhouse gas emissions
    Hyland, J. J.
    Styles, D.
    Jones, D. L.
    Williams, A. P.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2016, 147 : 123 - 131
  • [8] Adoption of precision livestock farming technologies has the potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from beef production
    Mcnicol, Louise C.
    Bowen, Jenna M.
    Ferguson, Holly J.
    Bell, Julian
    Dewhurst, Richard J.
    Duthie, Carol-Anne
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [9] Livestock Production and Its Impact on Nutrient Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Sakadevan, K.
    Nguyen, M. -L.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 141, 2017, 141 : 147 - 184
  • [10] Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States
    Hope W. Phetteplace
    Donald E. Johnson
    Andrew F. Seidl
    [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 99 - 102