Combining High-Throughput Imaging in Visible and SWIR wavelengths for In-Situ Porosity Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Ahar, Ayyoub [1 ]
Vandecasteele, Mathieu [2 ]
Booth, Brian G. [2 ]
De Grave, Kurt [1 ]
Verhees, Dries [1 ]
Philips, Wilfried [2 ]
Bey-Temsamani, Abdellatif [1 ]
机构
[1] Flanders Make, B-3920 Lommel, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Imec TELIN IPI, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
LASER 3D MANUFACTURING XI | 2024年 / 12876卷
关键词
LPBF; In-situ Monitoring; Lack-of-Fusion; Keyhole Porosity; Additive Manufacturing; SWIR; Variational Autoencoder; Sensor Fusion;
D O I
10.1117/12.2692836
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser powder bed fusion is at the forefront of manufacturing metallic objects, particularly those with complex geometries or those produced in limited quantities. However, this 3D printing method is susceptible to several printing defects due to the complexities of using a high-power laser with ultra-fast actuation. Accurate online print defect detection is therefore in high demand, and this defect detection must maintain a low computational profile to enable low-latency process intervention. In this work, we propose a low-latency LPBF defect detection algorithm based on fusion of images from high-speed cameras in the visible and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectrum ranges. First, we design an experiment to print an object while both imposing porosity defects on the print, and recording the laser's melt pool with the high-speed cameras. We then train variational autoencoders on images from both cameras to extract and fuse two sets of corresponding features. The melt pool recordings are then annotated with pore densities extracted from the printed object's CT scan. These annotations are then used to train and evaluate the ability of a fast neural network model to predict the occurrence of porosity from the fused features. We compare the prediction performance of our sensor fused model with models trained on image features from each camera separately. We observe that the SWIR imaging is sensitive to keyhole porosity while the visible-range optical camera is sensitive to lack-of-fusion porosity. By fusing features from both cameras, we are able to accurately predict both pore types, thus outperforming both single camera systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An integrated simulation model towards laser powder bed fusion in-situ alloying technology
    Hou, Yaqing
    Su, Hang
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Fafa
    Wang, Xuandong
    He, Yazhou
    He, Dupeng
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2023, 228
  • [42] Quasi In-Situ Study of Microstructure in a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Martensitic Stainless Steel
    Ayda Shahriari
    Mehdi Sanjari
    Mahdi Mahmoudiniya
    Hadi Pirgazi
    Babak Shalchi Amirkhiz
    Leo A. I. Kestens
    Mohsen Mohammadi
    Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2024, 55 : 1302 - 1310
  • [43] Unveiling processing-property relationships in laser powder bed fusion: The synergy of machine learning and high-throughput experiments
    Amiri, Mahsa
    Foumani, Zahra Zanjani
    Cao, Penghui
    Valdevit, Lorenzo
    Bostanabad, Ramin
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2025, 252
  • [44] Quantification and prediction of lack-of-fusion porosity in the high porosity regime during laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V
    Promoppatum, Patcharapit
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    Quek, Siu Sin
    Msolli, Sabeur
    Shukla, Shashwat
    Johan, Nur Syafiqah
    van der Veen, Sjoerd
    Jhon, Mark Hyunpong
    Mishra, Rajiv
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 300
  • [45] A machine learning methodology for porosity classification and process map prediction in laser powder bed fusion
    Staszewska, Adrianna
    Patil, Deepali P.
    Dixith, Akshatha C.
    Neamtu, Rodica
    Lados, Diana A.
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 9 (06) : 1901 - 1911
  • [46] In-situ monitoring of laser-based powder bed fusion using fringe projection
    Remani, Afaf
    Rossi, Arianna
    Pena, Fernando
    Thompson, Adam
    Dardis, John
    Jones, Nick
    Senin, Nicola
    Leach, Richard
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 90
  • [47] In-situ sensing, process monitoring and machine control in Laser Powder Bed Fusion: A review
    McCann, Ronan
    Obeidi, Muhannad A.
    Hughes, Cian
    McCarthy, Eanna
    Egan, Darragh S.
    Vijayaraghavan, Rajani K.
    Joshi, Ajey M.
    Garzon, Victor Acinas
    Dowling, Denis P.
    McNally, Patrick J.
    Brabazon, Dermot
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 45
  • [48] In-Situ Characterization of Pore Formation Dynamics in Pulsed Wave Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Hojjatzadeh, S. Mohammad H.
    Guo, Qilin
    Parab, Niranjan D.
    Qu, Minglei
    Escano, Luis, I
    Fezzaa, Kamel
    Everhart, Wes
    Sun, Tao
    Chen, Lianyi
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (11)
  • [49] Quasi In-Situ Study of Microstructure in a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Martensitic Stainless Steel
    Shahriari, Ayda
    Sanjari, Mehdi
    Mahmoudiniya, Mahdi
    Pirgazi, Hadi
    Amirkhiz, Babak Shalchi
    Kestens, Leo A. I.
    Mohammadi, Mohsen
    METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A-PHYSICAL METALLURGY AND MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2024, 55 (05): : 1302 - 1310
  • [50] An Image Segmentation Framework for In-Situ Monitoring in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing
    Xie, Jason
    Jiang, Tianyu
    Chen, Xu
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (37): : 800 - 806