Combining High-Throughput Imaging in Visible and SWIR wavelengths for In-Situ Porosity Prediction in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Ahar, Ayyoub [1 ]
Vandecasteele, Mathieu [2 ]
Booth, Brian G. [2 ]
De Grave, Kurt [1 ]
Verhees, Dries [1 ]
Philips, Wilfried [2 ]
Bey-Temsamani, Abdellatif [1 ]
机构
[1] Flanders Make, B-3920 Lommel, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Imec TELIN IPI, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
来源
LASER 3D MANUFACTURING XI | 2024年 / 12876卷
关键词
LPBF; In-situ Monitoring; Lack-of-Fusion; Keyhole Porosity; Additive Manufacturing; SWIR; Variational Autoencoder; Sensor Fusion;
D O I
10.1117/12.2692836
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Laser powder bed fusion is at the forefront of manufacturing metallic objects, particularly those with complex geometries or those produced in limited quantities. However, this 3D printing method is susceptible to several printing defects due to the complexities of using a high-power laser with ultra-fast actuation. Accurate online print defect detection is therefore in high demand, and this defect detection must maintain a low computational profile to enable low-latency process intervention. In this work, we propose a low-latency LPBF defect detection algorithm based on fusion of images from high-speed cameras in the visible and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectrum ranges. First, we design an experiment to print an object while both imposing porosity defects on the print, and recording the laser's melt pool with the high-speed cameras. We then train variational autoencoders on images from both cameras to extract and fuse two sets of corresponding features. The melt pool recordings are then annotated with pore densities extracted from the printed object's CT scan. These annotations are then used to train and evaluate the ability of a fast neural network model to predict the occurrence of porosity from the fused features. We compare the prediction performance of our sensor fused model with models trained on image features from each camera separately. We observe that the SWIR imaging is sensitive to keyhole porosity while the visible-range optical camera is sensitive to lack-of-fusion porosity. By fusing features from both cameras, we are able to accurately predict both pore types, thus outperforming both single camera systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prediction study on in-situ reduction of thermal stress using combined laser beams in laser powder bed fusion
    Chen, Changpeng
    Xiao, Zhongxu
    Wang, Yilong
    Yang, Xu
    Zhu, Haihong
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2021, 47 (47)
  • [12] In-situ monitoring of powder bed fusion of polymers using laser profilometry
    Sillani, Francesco
    MacDonald, Eric
    Villela, Janely
    Schmid, Manfred
    Wegener, Konrad
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 59
  • [13] On the use of spatter signature for in-situ monitoring of Laser Powder Bed Fusion
    Repossini, Giulia
    Laguzza, Vittorio
    Grasso, Marco
    Colosimo, Bianca Maria
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2017, 16 : 35 - 48
  • [14] In-Situ Metrology System for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Process
    Land, William S., II
    Zhang, Bin
    Ziegert, John
    Davies, Angela
    43RD NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 43, 2015, 1 : 393 - 403
  • [15] A deep learning framework for defect prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring in laser powder bed fusion
    Oster, Simon
    Breese, Philipp P. P.
    Ulbricht, Alexander
    Mohr, Gunther
    Altenburg, Simon J. J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2024, 35 (04) : 1687 - 1706
  • [16] In-situ alloyed CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy: Microstructural development in laser powder bed fusion
    Peng Chen
    Xiyu Yao
    Moataz M.Attallah
    Ming Yan
    Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 2022, 123 (28) : 123 - 135
  • [17] A deep learning framework for defect prediction based on thermographic in-situ monitoring in laser powder bed fusion
    Simon Oster
    Philipp P. Breese
    Alexander Ulbricht
    Gunther Mohr
    Simon J. Altenburg
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2024, 35 : 1687 - 1706
  • [18] Local porosity prediction in metal powder bed fusion using in-situ thermography: A comparative study of machine learning techniques
    Oster, Simon
    Scheuschner, Nils
    Chand, Keerthana
    Altenburg, Simon J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 95
  • [19] Predicting defects in laser powder bed fusion using in-situ thermal imaging data and machine learning
    Estalaki, Sina Malakpour
    Lough, Cody S.
    Landers, Robert G.
    Kinzel, Edward C.
    Luo, Tengfei
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 58
  • [20] In-situ characterization of laser-powder interaction and cooling rates through high-speed imaging of powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Bertoli, Umberto Scipioni
    Guss, Gabe
    Wu, Sheldon
    Matthews, Manyalibo J.
    Schoenung, Julie M.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 135 : 385 - 396