Quantification of the Environmental Impact of Feeding Yeast Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Actisaf Sc 47 in Dairy Cow: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:1
|
作者
Salah, Nizar [1 ]
Legendre, Heloise [1 ]
Paiva, Erika [1 ]
Duclos, Julie [1 ]
Briche, Maxime [1 ]
Maaoui, Mariem [2 ]
Scholten, Jasper [2 ]
Boute, Celine Garat [1 ]
机构
[1] Phileo Lesaffre, F-59700 Marquette Lez Lille, France
[2] Blonk Sustainabil Tools, Groen van Prinsterersingel 45, NL-2805 TD Gouda, Netherlands
来源
ANIMALS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 15期
关键词
yeast probiotic; life cycle assessment; dairy cow; Actisaf Sc 47; RUMEN FERMENTATION; LIVE YEASTS; EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; EFFICIENCY; PROTEIN; FARMS;
D O I
10.3390/ani14152202
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Today, one of the major challenges of dairy farmers is to reduce their environmental footprint to establish more effective, efficient, and sustainable production systems. Feed additives such as yeast probiotics could potentially allow them to achieve these objectives through the improvement of milk production, feed efficiency, and ration valorization, hence mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) principle was performed to estimate the environmental impact of the production and supplementation of a commercial yeast probiotic (Actisaf Sc 47) in three trials performed in three different countries that are representative for around 50% of the milk production in Europe: France (French trial), United Kingdom (UK trial), and Germany (German trial). For each trial, two groups of animals were compared: control, without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation, used as baseline; and experimental, with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 or 10 g/cow/day. Different impact categories were analyzed for each group to calculate the impact of producing 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk. An initial analysis was done only during the period of Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation and showed than the supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 reduced, on average by 5%, the carbon footprint during the three trials. A second analysis was done via the extrapolation of all the data of each trial to an annual farm level, including the lactation period (305 days), dry period (60 days), and the period with and without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation. Reported at a farm annual scale, the average reduction allowed by Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation was 2.9, 2.05, 2.47, 1.67, 2.28, 2.18, 2.14, and 2.28% of the carbon footprint, land use, water use, resource use, acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, and terrestrial eutrophication, respectively. On average, the production of 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk by using Actisaf Sc 47 was shown to improve environmental impacts compared to control. Regarding Actisaf Sc 47 production, the LCA showed that the production of 1 kg of Actisaf Sc 47 emitted 2.1 kg CO2 eq with a negligible contribution to total the carbon footprint of milk ranging from 0.005 to 0.016%. The use of Actisaf Sc 47 in dairy cows could then result in different positive outcomes: improving performance and efficiency while reducing the global carbon footprint.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental impact of roof tiles using recycled waste glass coatings: A Life Cycle Assessment approach
    Mourou, Chaimae
    Bonoli, Alessandra
    Zamorano, Montserrat
    Martin-Morales, Maria
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 270
  • [32] Modular life cycle assessment approach: Environmental impact of rainwater harvesting systems in urban water systems
    Teston, Andrea
    Ghisi, Enedir
    Vaz, Igor Catao Martins
    Scolaro, Taylana Piccinini
    Severis, Roni Matheus
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 908
  • [33] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DURING PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS BASED APPROACH TO LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENTS
    Santucci, Alissa
    Esterman, Marcos
    INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 4, 2016,
  • [34] Life cycle assessment of electric kick scooters: consolidating environmental impact quantification and concluding climate-friendly use options
    Baumgartner, Corinna
    Helmers, Eckard
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2024, 36 (01)
  • [35] The use of life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of production and feeding of conventional and genetically modified maize for broiler production in Argentina
    Bennett, RM
    Phipps, RH
    Strange, AM
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 2006, 15 (01): : 71 - 82
  • [36] Industry-Cost-Curve Approach for Modeling the Environmental Impact of Introducing New Technologies in Life Cycle Assessment
    Kaetelhoen, Arne
    von der Assen, Niklas
    Suh, Sangwon
    Jung, Johannes
    Bardow, Andre
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (13) : 7543 - 7551
  • [37] Assessing the environmental impact of inland waterway transport using a life-cycle assessment approach: The case of Flanders
    Van Lier, Tom
    Macharis, Cathy
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 12 : 29 - 40
  • [38] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION DURING THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN AN INDUSTRIALIZED CITY IN MEXICO: AN APPROACH OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Aldana-Espitia, N. C.
    Botello-Alvarez, I. E.
    Rivas-Garcia, P.
    Cerino-Cordova, F. J.
    Bravo-Sanchez, M. G.
    Abel-Seabra, J. E.
    Estrada-Baltazar, A.
    REVISTA MEXICANA DE INGENIERIA QUIMICA, 2017, 16 (02): : 563 - 580
  • [39] Environmental impact assessment of a package type IFAS reactor during construction and operational phases: a life cycle approach
    Singh, Nitin Kumar
    Singh, Rana Pratap
    Kazmi, Absar Ahmad
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 75 (10) : 2246 - 2256
  • [40] The environmental impact of circular building design: A simplified approach to evaluate remountable building elements in life cycle assessment
    Van Gulck, Lisa
    Steeman, Marijke
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 254