Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of dental implant placement using haptic robotic guidance in a large clinical series. Materials andMethods: In a prospective single-arm clinical study, 108 patients received 273 individual endosteal implants. A virtual preoperative restorative and surgical plan was created from a CBCT scan and matched to the surgical workspace on the day of surgery via either a tooth-based or bone-based fiducial splint. Intraoperatively, the surgeon manipulated a handpiece attached to a haptic robotic guidance arm. A variety of drills and implants were used. Both the osteotomy and the implant placement were guided by 3D haptic constraints according to the virtual plan. Postoperative CBCT scans permitted the calculation of the actual implant placement deviations compared to the plan for accuracy. Precision was calculated by comparing SDs from published literature. Results: The implants were evenly distributed by arch, with 47% placed in the maxilla and 53% in the mandible. The mean +/- SD signed depth deviation was 0.14 +/- 0.87 mm proud. The global angular deviation averaged 1.42 +/- 1.53 degrees, with 95% confidence limits of 1.24 and 1.60 degrees. The crown of the actual placed implant showed an average deviation from the plan of 1.10 +/- 0.69 mm and the apex of the placed implant showed a deviation of 1.12 +/- 0.69 mm. Haptic robotic guidance showed greater precision than freehand, static computerguided, and dynamic computer-guided implant placement. Conclusions: This large clinical series of 273 implants shows a high accuracy of implant placement compared to the published accuracy for angular deviations for any technology, as weil as demonstrating statistically greater precision. Long-term clinical studies are necessary to establish the true effect of increased accuracy on clinical outcomes. Using haptic robotic guidance provides accurate implant placement while allowing additional benefits compared to computer-guided surgery, namely full visualization of the surgical field and the ability to change the plan intraoperatively. Inti Oral Maxillofac Implants 2024;39:99-106. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10468