The impact of sphygmomanometer placement and cuff placement on blood pressure measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao-Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Pu-Hua [1 ]
Huang, Wen-Yin [1 ]
Huang, Wan [1 ]
Tang, Xin-Hu [1 ]
Yu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Su-Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Provinc, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; electronic sphygmomanometer; mercury sphygmomanometer; ARM;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is the most significant global risk factor for mortality and morbidity, making standardized blood pressure measurement crucial. Objectives: To investigate whether the location of blood pressure monitors and the positioning of cuffs yield differing results in blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang College between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023 were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into four groups. These groups were defined based on the positioning of monitoring equipment as follows: varied placements of cuffs on automatic blood pressure monitors, different heights for mercury column blood pressure monitors, varied heights for automatic blood pressure monitors, and different orientations for the cuff airbag tubes on electrocardiogram monitors. Blood pressure was measured and recorded for each group, followed by an analysis of the variations in readings across the different setups. Results: In the first cohort of 763 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure measured at the standard upper arm site was 128.8 +/- 10.5 mmHg, compared to 125.3 +/- 10.4 mmHg at the elbow fossa. The corresponding diastolic pressures were 79.2 +/- 10.7 and 75.0 +/- 10.6 mmHg, respectively. The difference in systolic pressure between these positions was significant at 3.48 +/- 3.22 mmHg (t(1)= 29.91, p(1) < 0.001) and for diastolic pressure at 4.23 +/- 1.31mmHg (t(2)= 88.98, p(2) < 0.001). For the subsequent groups, involving 253, 312, and 225 individuals, respectively, blood pressure measurements were analyzed and compared across different methods within each group. All p-values exceeded 0.05, indicating no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Blood pressure values measured at the elbow fossa position using an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer were found to be lower than those measured at the upper arm position, with a difference of 3.48 mmHg for systolic and 4.23 mmHg for diastolic pressures. It is therefore essential to position the cuff correctly, specifically 2-3 cm above the elbow fossa, when utilizing an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer for blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, the placement of the mercury column sphygmomanometer and the automated sphygmomanometer at varying heights had no significant effect on blood pressure readings. Similarly, the orientation of the electrocardiogram's cuffed balloon tube, whether facing upward or downward, did not influence blood pressure measurement outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] One Size Does Not Fit All: Impact Of Using A Regular Cuff For All Blood Pressure Measurements
    Brady, Tammy M.
    Charleston, Jeanne
    Ishigami, Junichi
    Prokopowicz, Gregory P.
    Miller, Edgar R.
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    Appel, Lawrence J.
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 145
  • [42] Subacromial Spacer Placement for Protection of Rotator Cuff Repair
    Szollosy, Gregor
    Rosso, Claudio
    Fogerty, Simon
    Petkin, Kalojan
    Lafosse, Laurent
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2014, 3 (05): : E605 - E609
  • [43] Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer
    Rogers, P
    Burke, V
    Stroud, P
    Puddey, IB
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 26 (5-6) : 477 - 481
  • [44] RANDOM-ZERO SPHYGMOMANOMETER, ROSE TAPE, AND THE ACCURACY OF THE BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS IN CHILDREN
    NUUTINEN, M
    TURTINEN, J
    UHARI, M
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (02) : 243 - 247
  • [45] Impact of probe placement on high frequency measurements of on-chip interconnects
    Kim, J
    Neikirk, DP
    ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING, 2004, : 29 - 32
  • [46] Do larger cuff sizes with artificial urinary sphincter placement increase the risk of leakage after placement?
    Otis-Chapados, Samuel
    de los Reyes, Thomas
    Mousa, Ahmad
    Fervaha, Gagan
    Radomski, Sidney B.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (01) : 11419 - 11423
  • [47] Relationship between blood pressure obtained from the upper arm with a cuff-type sphygmomanometer and central blood pressure measured with a catheter-tipped micromanometer
    Nobuyuki Ohte
    Tomoaki Saeki
    Hiromichi Miyabe
    Seichiro Sakata
    Seiji Mukai
    Junichiro Hayano
    Kiyomi Niki
    Motoaki Sugawara
    Genjiro Kimura
    Heart and Vessels, 2007, 22 : 410 - 415
  • [49] COMPARISON OF BLOOD-PRESSURE READINGS UTILIZING A MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER AND AN ELECTRONIC DIGITAL SPHYGMOMANOMETER
    PICCARELLI, J
    POSNER, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1975, 52 (11): : 796 - 796
  • [50] Relationship between blood pressure obtained from the upper arm with a cuff-type sphygmomanometer and central blood pressure measured with a catheter-tipped micromanometer
    Ohte, Nobuyuki
    Saeki, Tomoaki
    Miyabe, Hiromichi
    Sakata, Seichiro
    Mukai, Seiji
    Hayano, Junichiro
    Niki, Kiyomi
    Sugawara, Motoaki
    Kimura, Genjiro
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2007, 22 (06) : 410 - 415