The impact of sphygmomanometer placement and cuff placement on blood pressure measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao-Yong [1 ]
Zhang, Pu-Hua [1 ]
Huang, Wen-Yin [1 ]
Huang, Wan [1 ]
Tang, Xin-Hu [1 ]
Yu, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Su-Nan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiujiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Provinc, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; hypertension; electronic sphygmomanometer; mercury sphygmomanometer; ARM;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2024.1388313
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hypertension is the most significant global risk factor for mortality and morbidity, making standardized blood pressure measurement crucial. Objectives: To investigate whether the location of blood pressure monitors and the positioning of cuffs yield differing results in blood pressure measurements. Methods: Patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang College between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023 were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated into four groups. These groups were defined based on the positioning of monitoring equipment as follows: varied placements of cuffs on automatic blood pressure monitors, different heights for mercury column blood pressure monitors, varied heights for automatic blood pressure monitors, and different orientations for the cuff airbag tubes on electrocardiogram monitors. Blood pressure was measured and recorded for each group, followed by an analysis of the variations in readings across the different setups. Results: In the first cohort of 763 individuals, mean systolic blood pressure measured at the standard upper arm site was 128.8 +/- 10.5 mmHg, compared to 125.3 +/- 10.4 mmHg at the elbow fossa. The corresponding diastolic pressures were 79.2 +/- 10.7 and 75.0 +/- 10.6 mmHg, respectively. The difference in systolic pressure between these positions was significant at 3.48 +/- 3.22 mmHg (t(1)= 29.91, p(1) < 0.001) and for diastolic pressure at 4.23 +/- 1.31mmHg (t(2)= 88.98, p(2) < 0.001). For the subsequent groups, involving 253, 312, and 225 individuals, respectively, blood pressure measurements were analyzed and compared across different methods within each group. All p-values exceeded 0.05, indicating no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: Blood pressure values measured at the elbow fossa position using an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer were found to be lower than those measured at the upper arm position, with a difference of 3.48 mmHg for systolic and 4.23 mmHg for diastolic pressures. It is therefore essential to position the cuff correctly, specifically 2-3 cm above the elbow fossa, when utilizing an upper arm-type automatic sphygmomanometer for blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, the placement of the mercury column sphygmomanometer and the automated sphygmomanometer at varying heights had no significant effect on blood pressure readings. Similarly, the orientation of the electrocardiogram's cuffed balloon tube, whether facing upward or downward, did not influence blood pressure measurement outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Experimental Study on the Blood Pressure Cuff as a Transducer for Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements
    Bogatu, Laura, I
    Turco, Simona
    Mischi, Massimo
    Muehlsteff, Jens
    Woerlee, Pierre
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2021, 70
  • [22] Placement of TOF-Cuff® on the lower leg for neuromuscular and blood pressure monitoring during anesthetic induction for shoulder surgeries
    Dullenkopf, Alexander
    Horn, Katja
    Steurer, Marc P.
    Hess, Florian
    Welter, JoEllen
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [23] COMPARING BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS BETWEEN A NOVEL CUFF-LESS EARPHONE-TYPE DEVICE BASED ON GREEN REFLECTED PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY AND A STANDARD CUFF-BASED SPHYGMOMANOMETER
    Kanai, Daisuke
    Wakui, Hiromichi
    Sato, Shohei
    Lee, Jihyoung
    Urate, Shingo
    Tanaka, Shohei
    Tamura, Kouichi
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 : E204 - E205
  • [24] Placement of TOF-Cuff® on the lower leg for neuromuscular and blood pressure monitoring during anesthetic induction for shoulder surgeries
    Alexander Dullenkopf
    Katja Horn
    Marc P. Steurer
    Florian Hess
    JoEllen Welter
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2020, 34 : 79 - 85
  • [25] Comparison of blood pressure measurements of anesthetized dogs obtained noninvasively with a cylindrical blood pressure cuff and an anatomically modified conical blood pressure cuff
    Ramos, Sara J.
    da Cunha, Anderson F.
    Domingues, Michelle
    Shelby, Amanda M.
    Stout, Rhett W.
    Acierno, Mark J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 77 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [26] POSSIBLE SOURCES OF DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SPHYGMOMANOMETER CUFF PRESSURE AND BLOOD-PRESSURE QUANTIFIED IN A COLLAPSIBLE-TUBE ANALOG
    BERTRAM, CD
    BUTCHER, KSA
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (01): : 68 - 77
  • [27] SPHYGMOMANOMETER CUFF CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS AFFECT TRANSMISSION OF PRESSURE FROM CUFF TO ARTERIAL WALL. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AND DICOM DATA
    Lewis, P.
    Naqvi, S.
    Mandal, P.
    Potluri, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 : E127 - E127
  • [28] The effects of sphygmomanometer cuff construction on return-to-flow cuff inflation pressure using a physical simulation model of arm blood flow
    Naqvi, Shenela
    Potluri, Prasad
    Mandal, Parthasarathi
    Lewis, Philip
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2019, 33 : 15 - 15
  • [29] In-use comparison of blood pressure measurements from an automated blood pressure instrument with those from a mercury sphygmomanometer
    Gupta, Puneet
    Mittal, Lalita
    Rizzo, Robert A.
    Bikkina, Mahesh
    Debari, Vincent A.
    Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, 2009, 43 (02): : 158 - 163
  • [30] Evaluation of indirect blood pressure monitoring in awake and anesthetized red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis): effects of cuff size, cuff placement, and monitoring equipment
    Zehnder, Ashley M.
    Hawkins, Michelle G.
    Pascoe, Peter J.
    Kass, Philip H.
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2009, 36 (05) : 464 - 479