Human error identification and risk assessment in loading and unloading of petroleum products by road trucks using the SHERPA and fuzzy inference system method

被引:2
|
作者
Aliabadi, Mostafa Mirzaei [1 ]
Mohammadfam, Iraj [2 ]
Khorshidikia, Samane [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Ctr Excellence Occupat Hlth Occupat Hlth, Safety Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Hlth Emergency & Disaster Res Ctr, Dept Ergon, Tehran, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Occupat Hlth & Safety Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Occupat Hlth Engn, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
Human error; Loading operation; Unloading operation; Road truck; SHERPA; Fuzzy inference system (FIS); FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34072
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human error constitutes one of the primary causes of accidents, particularly in the context of loading and unloading operations involving road trucks, especially those carrying petroleum products. The process of identifying and evaluating human errors within these operations involves several key steps. Initially, all sub-tasks associated with loading and unloading are meticulously identified and analyzed utilizing Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA), achieved through direct observation, document examination, and interviews. Subsequently, potential human error modes within each task are delineated using the Systematic Human Error Reduction and Prediction Approach (SHERPA). Finally, essential data for determining the criticality, probability, and severity of each error are gathered through expert elicitation and the application of Fuzzy Inference Systems (FIS). Through the analysis of SHERPA worksheets, a total of 37 errors during loading operations and 14 errors during unloading operations of petroleum products were identified. Among these errors, the predominant category during loading operations was action errors, comprising 31 instances, while communication errors were the least frequent, occurring only twice. Similarly, action errors were most prevalent during unloading operations, constituting 13 instances. These errors were further categorized and ranked based on their risk levels, resulting in 27 levels for loading operations and 12 levels for unloading operations. The consistent occurrence of action errors underscores the need for implementing control measures to mitigate their frequency and severity. Such strategies may include periodic training sessions to reinforce proper work procedures and the development of monitoring checklists, among other interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Construction project risk assessment by using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system: An empirical study
    Ebrat, Mehdi
    Ghodsi, Reza
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (05) : 1213 - 1227
  • [32] Structural system identification by measurement error-minimization observability method using multiple static loading cases
    Lei, Jun
    Lozano-Galant, Jose Antonio
    Xu, Dong
    Zhang, Feng-Liang
    Turmo, Jose
    SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2022, 30 (04) : 339 - 351
  • [33] Prediction of human error probability during the hydrocarbon road tanker loading operation using a hybrid technique of fuzzy sets, Bayesian network and CREAM
    Ghasemi, Fakhradin
    Ghasemi, Arash
    Kalatpour, Omid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, 28 (03) : 1342 - 1352
  • [34] Risk Assessment for Urban Gas Transmission and Distribution System Using Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method
    Liu, Dongjing
    Zhou, Weiguo
    He, Shujing
    JOURNAL OF PIPELINE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND PRACTICE, 2018, 9 (01) : 04017038
  • [35] Power system risk assessment using a hybrid method of fuzzy set and Monte Carlo simulation
    Li, Wenyuan
    Zhou, Jiaqi
    Xie, Kaigui
    Xiong, Xiaofu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (02) : 336 - 343
  • [36] Fuzzy risk assessment of mortality after coronary surgery using combination of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and K-means clustering
    Nouei, Mahyar Taghizadeh
    Kamyad, Ali Vahidian
    Sarzaeem, MahmoodReza
    Ghazalbash, Somayeh
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2016, 33 (03) : 230 - 238
  • [37] A fire risk assessment system and application for process industry using fuzzy Petri net and HAZID method
    Chen, Xingbai
    Wang, Ziyun
    Zhang, Cheng
    Xiang, Yue
    Dai, Yiyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2024, 238 (05) : 903 - +
  • [38] Human cardiovascular system indentification and application using a hybrid method of auto-regression and neuro-fuzzy inference systems
    Liu, JY
    Jamshidi, M
    Pourbabak, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 4107 - 4112
  • [39] Systematic assessment method for post-earthquake damage of regional buildings using adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system
    Zhang, Weiping
    Wang, Ruilin
    Chen, Xiaoxi
    Jia, Dongfeng
    Zhou, Zhihao
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 78
  • [40] Integration of cancer and non-cancer human health risk assessment for Aniline enriched groundwater: a fuzzy inference system-based approach
    Vijay Laxmi Mohanta
    Brijesh Kumar Mishra
    Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2020, 42 : 3623 - 3639