Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Mueller, Simon [1 ]
Jain, Mohit [2 ]
Sachdeva, Bhuvan [2 ,3 ]
Shah, Payal N. [3 ]
Holz, Frank G. [1 ]
Finger, Robert P. [1 ,4 ]
Murali, Kaushik [3 ]
Wintergerst, Maximilian W. M. [1 ,7 ]
Schultz, Thomas [5 ,6 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Ophthalmol, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Microsoft Res, Bengaluru, India
[3] Sankara Eye Hosp, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Dept Ophthalmol, Mannheim, Germany
[5] Univ Bonn, B IT, Bonn, Germany
[6] Univ Bonn, Dept Comp Sci, Bonn, Germany
[7] Augenzentrum Grischun, Chur, Switzerland
[8] Lamarr Inst Machine Learning & Artificial Intellig, Dortmund, Germany
来源
关键词
cataract surgery; phacoemulsification; deep learning; convolutional neural networks; recurrent neural networks; video analysis; tracking; ophthalmology; vision transformers; risk assessment; surgical outcomes; review; SURGICAL TASKS; RECOGNITION;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.13.4.20
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the current use and reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) -based algorithms for analyzing cataract surgery videos. Methods: A systematic review of the literature about intra-operative analysis of cataract surgery videos with machine learning techniques was performed. Cataract diagnosis and detection algorithms were excluded. Resulting algorithms were compared, descriptively analyzed, and metrics summarized or visually reported. The reproducibility and reliability of the methods and results were assessed using a modified version of the Medical Image Computing and Computer -Assisted (MICCAI) checklist. Results: Thirty-eight of the 550 screened studies were included, 20 addressed the challenge of instrument detection or tracking, 9 focused on phase discrimination, and 8 predicted skill and complications. Instrument detection achieves an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC AUC) between 0.976 and 0.998, instrument tracking an mAP between 0.685 and 0.929, phase recognition an ROC AUC between 0.773 and 0.990, and complications or surgical skill performs with an ROC AUC between 0.570 and 0.970. Conclusions: The studies showed a wide variation in quality and pose a challenge regarding replication due to a small number of public datasets (none for manual small incision cataract surgery) and seldom published source code. There is no standard for reported outcome metrics and validation of the models on external datasets is rare making comparisons difficult. The data suggests that tracking of instruments and phase detection work well but surgical skill and complication recognition remains a challenge for deep learning. Translational Relevance: This overview of cataract surgery analysis with AI models provides translational value for improving training of the clinician by identifying successes and challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technical skill assessment in minimally invasive surgery using artificial intelligence: a systematic review
    Pedrett, Romina
    Mascagni, Pietro
    Beldi, Guido
    Padoy, Nicolas
    Lavanchy, Joel L.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7412 - 7424
  • [42] Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review
    Sumner, Jennifer
    Lim, Hui Wen
    Chong, Lin Siew
    Bundele, Anjali
    Mukhopadhyay, Amartya
    Kayambu, Geetha
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 146
  • [43] Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review
    Segato, Alice
    Marzullo, Aldo
    Calimeri, Francesco
    De Momi, Elena
    [J]. APL BIOENGINEERING, 2020, 4 (04):
  • [44] Artificial Intelligence in Malnutrition: A Systematic Literature Review
    Janssen, Sander M. W.
    Bouzembrak, Yamine
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2024, 15 (09)
  • [45] The application of artificial intelligence in hepatology: A systematic review
    Balsano, Clara
    Alisi, Anna
    Brunetto, Maurizia R.
    Invernizzi, Pietro
    Burra, Patrizia
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [46] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
    Van Booven, Derek J.
    Kuchakulla, Manish
    Pai, Raghav
    Frech, Fabio S.
    Ramasahayam, Reshna
    Reddy, Pritika
    Parmar, Madhumita
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Arora, Himanshu
    [J]. RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 31 - 39
  • [47] Use of Artificial Intelligence for Training: A Systematic Review
    Jiang, Nina
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    [J]. DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, DHM 2024, PT III, 2024, 14711 : 346 - 363
  • [48] A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    Antoniou, Josephina
    Bhalla, Nitika
    Brooks, Laurence
    Jansen, Philip
    Lindqvist, Blerta
    Kirichenko, Alexey
    Marchal, Samuel
    Rodrigues, Rowena
    Santiago, Nicole
    Warso, Zuzanna
    Wright, David
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (11) : 12799 - 12831
  • [49] Applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A systematic review
    Kambale, Monika
    Jadhav, Sammita
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [50] Artificial intelligence in marketing: A systematic literature review
    Chintalapati, Srikrishna
    Pandey, Shivendra Kumar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 64 (01) : 38 - 68