Carbon footprint of tobacco production in China through Life-cycle-assessment: Regional compositions, spatiotemporal changes and driving factors

被引:1
|
作者
Ti, Jinsong [1 ]
Zheng, Yu [1 ]
Duan, Weidong [2 ]
Zhao, Haobin [3 ]
Qin, Yanqing [4 ]
Yin, Guangting [2 ]
Xie, Liangwen [4 ]
Dong, Wenshuai [1 ]
Lu, Xiaochong [1 ]
Song, Zhaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Tobacco Sci, Zhengzhou 450002, Peoples R China
[2] China Tobacco Henan Ind Co LTD, Zhengzhou 450016, Peoples R China
[3] China Natl Tobacco Corp Henan Prov Co, Zhengzhou 450018, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Prov Co, China Natl Tobacco Corp, Chengdu 610000, Peoples R China
关键词
Flue-cured tobacco production; Carbon emission; Carbon footprint; Life cycle assessment; Low-carbon agriculture; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; RICE PRODUCTION; EMISSION; PROVINCE; DECOMPOSITION; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; OVERUSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112216
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The global contribution of cigarette production to greenhouse gas emissions is substantial, with tobacco agricultural production being a major source. Based on statistical data, this research employs a Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) method to comprehensively evaluate China's flue-cured tobacco production carbon footprint (CF) from 2004 to 2020, detailing its components, spatiotemporal dynamics, and driving factors. The study reveals that the average CF per hectare for China's tobacco production (CFr) amounted to 12576.46 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1). Regionally, the CFr was 10799.55 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1) in Northern China, 14517.00 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1) in Southeastern China, 11788.82 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1) in the lower Yellow/Huai River region, 13138.70 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1) in the mid-Yangtze River and 12415.56 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1) in Southwestern China. Over the study period, Southwest China's CFr exhibited an upward trend with an annual growth rate of 121.81 kg CO(2)eq center dot ha(-1). At the micro-level, coal use contributes more than 60 % of carbon emissions, followed by curing power consumption. On a macro scale, economic activities significantly elevated the CF, whereas factors like carbon emission intensity, production efficiencies, and structural shifts contributed to its reduction. This research indicates that employing clean energy in curing barns, reducing agricultural film usage, and enhancing fertilizer utilization rates represent effective strategies for achieving low-carbon tobacco production. The results of this study have certain reference value for the policy formulation of low-carbon tobacco production and sustainable agriculture in China.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Key factors of carbon footprint in the UK food supply chains: a new perspective of life cycle assessment
    Ferguson Aikins, Emmanuel
    Ramanathan, Usha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 40 (7-8) : 945 - 970
  • [32] Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production
    Daniela Dressler
    Achim Loewen
    Michael Nelles
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 1104 - 1115
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production
    Dressler, Daniela
    Loewen, Achim
    Nelles, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (09): : 1104 - 1115
  • [34] Coupling life cycle assessment and global sensitivity analysis to evaluate the uncertainty and key processes associated with carbon footprint of rice production in Eastern China
    Xu, Qiang
    Li, Jingyong
    Liang, Hao
    Ding, Zhao
    Shi, Xinrui
    Chen, Yinglong
    Dou, Zhi
    Dai, Qigen
    Gao, Hui
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [35] Spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of reference evapotranspiration and crop evapotranspiration for cotton production in China from 1960 to 2019
    Su, Yuexia
    Wang, Jian
    Li, Junhong
    Wang, Lizhi
    Wang, Kunfeng
    Li, Ao
    Gao, Lei
    Wang, Zhanbiao
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [36] The ecological footprint evaluation of low carbon campuses based on life cycle assessment: A case study of Tianjin, China
    Liu, Hongbo
    Wang, Xinghua
    Yang, Jiangye
    Zhou, Xia
    Liu, Yunfeng
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 144 : 266 - 278
  • [37] Life Cycle Assessment-Based Carbon Footprint Accounting Model and Analysis for Integrated Energy Stations in China
    Sun, Xiaorong
    Pan, Xueping
    Jin, Chenhao
    Li, Yihan
    Xu, Qijie
    Zhang, Danxu
    Li, Hongyang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [38] Retrospective and prospective assessment of exergy, life cycle carbon emissions, and water footprint for coking network evolution in China
    Wu Junnian
    Pu Guangying
    Guo Yan
    Lv Jingwen
    Shang Jiangwei
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 218 : 479 - 493
  • [39] Life cycle carbon footprint analysis of suitcase production: Impact of material variations, size differences, and geographical factors
    Zhang, Hao
    Lang, Chunmin
    Zhang, Ruirui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 496
  • [40] Life-cycle Carbon Footprint Assessment and Techno-economic Analysis of Integrated Energy Production Unit
    Yu Q.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhao Q.
    Sun L.
    Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2024, 44 (08): : 3115 - 3124