Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition

被引:0
|
作者
Alwafi, Abdulraheem A. [1 ,2 ]
Panther, Scott [2 ]
Lo, Angela [2 ]
Yen, Edwin H. [2 ]
Zou, Bingshuang [2 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Dent Publ Hlth, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ British Columbia, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Hlth Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
关键词
CLEAR ALIGNERS; INVISALIGN; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; ATTACHMENTS;
D O I
10.3791/65531
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Since the introduction of Invisalign by Align Technology, Inc. in 1999, questions and debates have persisted regarding the precision of Invisalign (clear aligner) therapy, particularly when compared to the use of traditional fixed appliances. This becomes particularly significant in cases involving anteroposterior, vertical, and transverse corrections, where precise comparisons are of paramount importance. To address these inquiries, this study introduces a meticulously devised protocol, placing a primary emphasis on digitally superimposing the movement of maxillary posterior teeth to facilitate accurate analysis. The sample included 25 patients who had completed their first series of Invisalign (clear) aligners. Four maxillary digital models (pre-treatment, post -treatment, ClinCheck-initial, and final models) were digitally superimposed using the palate rugae and dentitions as stable references. A software combination was used for model superimposition and tooth segmentation. Transformation matrices then expressed the differences between the achieved and predicted tooth positions. Thresholds for clinically relevant differences were at +/- 0.25 mm for linear displacement and +/- 2 degrees for rotation. Differences were assessed using Hotelling's T -squared tests with Bonferroni correction. The mean differences in rotation (2.036 degrees +/- 4.217 degrees) and torque (-2.913 degrees +/- 3.263 degrees) were significant statistically and clinically, with p -values of 0.023 and 0.0003 respectively. De -rotation of premolars and torque control for all posterior teeth were less predictable. All mean differences for the linear measurements were statistically and clinically insignificant, except that the first molars seemed slightly (0.256 mm) more intruded than their predicted position. The clear aligner system appears to meet its prediction for most translational tooth movements and mesial-distal tipping in maxillary posterior teeth for non -extraction cases with mild to moderate malocclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures
    Vasilakos, Georgios
    Schilling, Roman
    Halazonetis, Demetrios
    Gkantidis, Nikolaos
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [2] Assessment of different techniques for 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental casts on palatal structures
    Georgios Vasilakos
    Roman Schilling
    Demetrios Halazonetis
    Nikolaos Gkantidis
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [3] Histomorphometric analysis of overloading on palatal tooth movement into the maxillary sinus
    Maeda, Yuichi
    Kuroda, Shingo
    Ganzorig, Khaliunaa
    Wazen, Rima
    Nanci, Antonio
    Tanaka, Eiji
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 148 (03) : 423 - 430
  • [4] Tooth movement using palatal implant supported anchorage compared to conventional dental anchorage
    Borsos, Gabriella
    Voko, Zoltan
    Gredes, Tomasz
    Kunert-Keil, Christiane
    Vegh, Andras
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2012, 194 (06) : 556 - 560
  • [5] Assessment of different 3D Superimposition Techniques of serial digital Maxillary Models using palatal Structures
    Schultze, Lara
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2018, 50 (01): : 6 - 8
  • [6] Accuracy and reliability of maxillary digital model (MDM) superimposition in evaluating teeth movement in adults compared with CBCT maxillary superimposition
    Pan, Yichen
    Wang, Xin
    Dai, Fanfan
    Chen, Gui
    Xu, Tianmin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [7] Accuracy and reliability of maxillary digital model (MDM) superimposition in evaluating teeth movement in adults compared with CBCT maxillary superimposition
    Yichen Pan
    Xin Wang
    Fanfan Dai
    Gui Chen
    Tianmin Xu
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [8] Positive Dental Identification Using Tooth Anatomy and Digital Superimposition
    Johansen, Raymond J.
    Bowers, C. Michael
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (02) : 534 - 536
  • [9] Superimposition of maxillary digital models using the palatal rugae: Does ageing affect the reliability?
    Garib, Daniela
    Miranda, Felicia
    Yatabe, Marilia S.
    Pereira Lauris, Jose Roberto
    Massaro, Camila
    McNamara, James A.
    Kim-Berman, Hera
    Janson, Guilherme
    Behrents, Rolf G.
    Cevidanes, Lucia H. S.
    Ruellas, Antonio Carlos de Oliveira
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2019, 22 (03) : 183 - 193
  • [10] Quantifying maxillary anterior tooth movement in digital orthodontics: Does the choice of the superimposition software matter?
    Adel, Samar M.
    Vaid, Nikhilesh R.
    El-Harouni, Nadia
    Kassem, Hassan
    Park, Jae Hyun
    Zaher, Abbas R.
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2023, 12 (05) : 187 - 196