Markovian and non-Markovian master equations versus an exactly solvable model of a qubit in a cavity

被引:0
|
作者
Xia, Zihan [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Nila, Juan [1 ,2 ]
Lidar, Daniel A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Ctr Quantum Informat Sci & Technol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Chem, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Phys & Astron, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED | 2024年 / 22卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CUMULANT EXPANSION; QUANTUM;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.014028
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Quantum master equations are commonly used to model the dynamics of open quantum systems, but their accuracy is rarely compared with the analytical solution of exactly solvable models. In this work, we perform such a comparison for the damped Jaynes-Cummings model of a qubit in a leaky cavity, for which an analytical solution is available in the one-excitation subspace. We consider the non-Markovian time-convolutionless master equation up to the second (Redfield) and fourth orders as well as three types of Markovian master equations: the coarse-grained, cumulant, and standard rotating-wave approximation (RWA) Lindblad equations. We compare the exact solution to these master equations for three different spectral densities: impulse, Ohmic, and triangular. We demonstrate that the coarse-grained master equation outperforms the standard RWA-based Lindblad master equation for weak coupling or high qubit frequency (relative to the spectral density high-frequency cutoff omega c), c ), where the Markovian approximation is valid. In the presence of non-Markovian effects characterized by oscillatory, nondecaying behavior, the timeconvolutionless approximation closely matches the exact solution for short evolution times (in units of omega -1 c master equations perform poorly, as quantified in terms of the trace-norm distance from the exact solution. The fourth-order time-convolutionless master equation achieves the top performance in all cases. Our results highlight the need for reliable approximation methods to describe open-system quantum dynamics beyond the short-time limit. ) even outside the regime of validity of the Markovian approximations. For long evolution times, all
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exact master equations for the non-Markovian decay of a qubit
    Vacchini, Bassano
    Breuer, Heinz-Peter
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2010, 81 (04)
  • [2] Entanglement dynamics in a non-Markovian environment: An exactly solvable model
    Wilson, Justin H.
    Fregoso, Benjamin M.
    Galitski, Victor M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2012, 85 (17):
  • [3] Non-Markovian dynamics of a qubit in a reservoir: different solutions of non-Markovian master equation
    Ding Bang-Fu
    Wang Xiao-Yun
    Tang Yan-Fang
    Mi Xian-Wu
    Zhao He-Ping
    [J]. CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2011, 20 (06)
  • [4] Non-Markovian dynamics of a qubit in a reservoir: different solutions of non-Markovian master equation
    丁邦福
    王小云
    唐艳芳
    米贤武
    赵鹤平
    [J]. Chinese Physics B, 2011, 20 (06) : 29 - 33
  • [5] Selected aspects of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum master equations
    Lendi, K
    [J]. IRREVERSIBLE QUANTUM DYNAMICS, 2003, 622 : 31 - 46
  • [6] Quantum versus classical counting in non-Markovian master equations
    Emary, Clive
    Aguado, R.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2011, 84 (08):
  • [7] Comb Model: Non-Markovian versus Markovian
    Iomin, Alexander
    Mendez, Vicenc
    Horsthemke, Werner
    [J]. FRACTAL AND FRACTIONAL, 2019, 3 (04) : 1 - 13
  • [8] Ultraslow diffusion in an exactly solvable non-Markovian random walk
    da Silva, M. A. A.
    Viswanathan, G. M.
    Cressoni, J. C.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2014, 89 (05):
  • [9] A tomographic approach to non-Markovian master equations
    Bellomo, Bruno
    De Pasquale, Antonella
    Gualdi, Giulia
    Marzolino, Ugo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND THEORETICAL, 2010, 43 (39)
  • [10] Positivity preserving non-Markovian master equations
    Wilkie, J
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2000, 62 (06) : 8808 - 8810