Gully erosion mapping susceptibility in a Mediterranean environment: A hybrid decision-making model

被引:7
|
作者
Hitouri, Sliman [1 ]
Meriame, Mohajane [2 ]
Ajim, Ali Sk [3 ]
Pacheco, Quevedo Renata [4 ]
Nguyen-Huy, Thong [5 ]
Bao, Pham Quoc [6 ]
ElKhrachy, Ismail [7 ]
Varasano, Antonietta [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ibn Tofail, Dept Geol, Geosci Lab, Fac Sci, Kenitra 14000, Morocco
[2] Natl Res Council Italy, Construct Technol Inst, Polo Tecnol San Giovanni Teduccio, I-80146 Naples, Italy
[3] Aligarh Muslim Univ AMU, Dept Geog, Fac Sci, Aligarh 202002, UP, India
[4] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, Earth Observat & Geoinformat Div, BR-12227010 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[6] Univ Silesia Katowice, Inst Earth Sci, Fac Nat Sci, Bedzinska St 60, PL-41200 Sosnowiec, Poland
[7] Najran Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Coll Engn, Najran 66291, Saudi Arabia
[8] CNR, Construct Technol Inst, ITC CNR, I-70124 Bari, Italy
关键词
WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RIVER-BASIN; SEMIARID REGION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; GIS; ENSEMBLE; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; CLASSIFIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.09.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is one of the main natural hazards, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, destroying ecosystem service and human well-being. Thus, gully erosion susceptibility maps (GESM) are urgently needed for identifying priority areas on which appropriate measurements should be considered. Here, we proposed four new hybrid Machine learning models, namely weight of evidence -Multilayer Perceptron (MLP- WoE), weight of evidence -K Nearest neighbours (KNN- WoE), weight of evidenceLogistic regression (LR- WoE), and weight of evidenceRandom Forest (RF- WoE), for mapping gully erosion exploring the opportunities of GIS tools and Remote sensing techniques in the El Ouaar watershed located in the Souss plain in Morocco. Inputs of the developed models are composed of the dependent (i.e., gully erosion points) and a set of independent variables. In this study, a total of 314 gully erosion points were randomly split into 70% for the training stage (220 gullies) and 30% for the validation stage (94 gullies) sets were identi fied in the study area. 12 conditioning variables including elevation, slope, plane curvature, rainfall, distance to road, distance to stream, distance to fault, TWI, lithology, NDVI, and LU/LC were used based on their importance for gully erosion susceptibility mapping. We evaluate the performance of the above models based on the following statistical metrics: Accuracy, precision, and Area under curve (AUC) values of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The results indicate the RF- WoE model showed good accuracy with (AUC 1 / 4 0.8), followed by KNN-WoE (AUC 1 / 4 0.796), then MLP-WoE (AUC 1 / 4 0.729) and LR-WoE (AUC 1 / 4 0.655), respectively. Gully erosion susceptibility maps provide information and valuable tool for decision-makers and planners to identify areas where urgent and appropriate interventions should be applied. (c) 2023 International Research and Training Center on Erosion and Sedimentation, China Water and Power Press, and China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co. Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 297
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE DECISION-MAKING GRID - A MODEL OF DECISION-MAKING STYLES
    HALL, J
    OLEARY, V
    WILLIAMS, M
    CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1964, 7 (02) : 43 - 54
  • [22] The Decision-Making Model is Determined by the Decision-Making Cost
    Yong, Tan
    SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, 2013, 9 : 195 - 198
  • [23] DECISION-MAKING IN A FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
    BELLMAN, RE
    ZADEH, LA
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1970, 17 (04): : B141 - B164
  • [24] Decision-making in Fuzzy Environment
    梅登华
    蔡淮
    徐志根
    电子科技大学学报, 1998, (02) : 89 - 93
  • [25] DECISION-MAKING IN A TURBULENT ENVIRONMENT
    RADFORD, KJ
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1978, 29 (07) : 677 - 682
  • [26] DECISION-MAKING IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT
    MOENECLAEY, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 25 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [27] DECISION-MAKING IN A FUZZY ENVIRONMENT
    DELGADO, M
    VERDEGAY, JL
    VILA, MA
    ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 1993, 146 (573-74) : 109 - 126
  • [28] Trustworthy Hybrid Decision-Making
    Mantri, Ipsit
    Sasikumar, Nevasini
    MACHINE LEARNING AND PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, ECML PKDD 2023, PT II, 2025, 2134 : 239 - 244
  • [29] Novel ensembles of COPRAS multi-criteria decision-making with logistic regression, boosted regression tree, and random forest for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Yamani, Mojtaba
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Melesse, Assefa
    Shirani, Kourosh
    Dieu Tien Bui
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 688 : 903 - 916
  • [30] Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility mapping
    Garosi, Younes
    Sheklabadi, Mohsen
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Besalatpour, Ali Asghar
    Conoscenti, Christian
    Van Oost, Kristof
    GEODERMA, 2018, 330 : 65 - 78