Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial (vol 15, e0227245, 2020)

被引：0
|
作者：
Young, David C.
Delaney, Tina
Armson, B. Anthony
Fanning, Cora
机构：
来源：
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1371/journal.pone.0304233
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Mogharbel, Hussain
    Rozzah, Rayyan
    D'Souza, Rohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S177 - S178
  • [42] Induction of Labor: oral versus vaginal Misoprostol
    Lorenz, Judith
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2019, 79 (10) : 1008 - +
  • [43] A comparison of labor induction by oral and vaginal misoprostol
    Pongsatha, S
    Vijittrawiwat, A
    Tongsong, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 88 (02) : 140 - 141
  • [44] Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor
    Bartusevicius, A
    Barcaite, E
    Nadisauskiene, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 91 (01) : 2 - 9
  • [45] A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
    Uludag, S
    Saricali, FS
    Madazli, R
    Cepni, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 122 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [46] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [47] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction
    Hall, R
    Duarte-Gardea, M
    Harlass, F
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06): : 1044 - 1048
  • [48] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reply
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 157 - 157
  • [49] Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for labor induction at term: A randomized controlled trial
    Bebbington, M
    Schmuel, E
    Pevzner, L
    Bernstein, P
    Dayal, A
    Barnhard, J
    Chazotte, C
    Merkatz, I
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S211 - S211
  • [50] Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone - is it effective and safe?
    Huber, Georgine
    Schuetz, Heike
    Seelbach-Goebel, Birgit
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (09): : 1043 - 1046
12345