Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial (vol 15, e0227245, 2020)

被引：0
|
作者：
Young, David C.
Delaney, Tina
Armson, B. Anthony
Fanning, Cora
机构：
来源：
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 05期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1371/journal.pone.0304233
中图分类号：
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号：
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in Enugu, Nigeria: a randomized controlled trial
    Paschalina Constance Ezechukwu
    Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu
    Samuel Nnamdi Obi
    Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 291 : 537 - 544
  • [22] Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert
    Maggi, Claudia
    Mazzoni, Giorgia
    Gerosa, Vera
    Fratelli, Nicola
    Prefumo, Federico
    Sartori, Enrico
    Lojacono, Andrea
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (10) : 1268 - 1273
  • [23] Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial
    De Bonrostro Torralba, Carlos
    Tejero Cabrejas, Eva Lucia
    Envid Lazaro, Blanca Mar
    Franco Royo, Maria Jesus
    Roca Arquillue, Montserrat
    Campillos Maza, Jose Manuel
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (07) : 913 - 919
  • [24] Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Successful Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Miller, Hugh
    Parker, Lamar
    Powers, Barbara L.
    Rayburn, William F.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (03): : 533 - 541
  • [25] Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
    Sebiha Özkan
    Eray Çalışkan
    Emek Doğer
    İzzet Yücesoy
    Semih Özeren
    Birol Vural
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009, 280 : 19 - 24
  • [26] Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
    Ozkan, Sebiha
    Caliskan, Eray
    Doger, Emek
    Yucesoy, Izzet
    Ozeren, Semih
    Vural, Birol
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2009, 280 (01) : 19 - 24
  • [27] Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
    Toppozada, MK
    Anwar, MYM
    Hassan, HA
    ElGazaerly, WS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 56 (02) : 135 - 139
  • [28] High-dose vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose vaginal misoprostol for midtrimester labor induction: A randomized trial
    Nuthalapaty, FS
    Ramsey, PS
    Biggio, JR
    Owen, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (03) : 1065 - 1070
  • [29] Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
    Faucett, A. M.
    Daniels, K.
    Lee, H. C.
    El-Sayed, Y. Y.
    Blumenfeld, Y. J.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (02) : 95 - 99
  • [30] Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term
    A M Faucett
    K Daniels
    H C Lee
    Y Y EL-Sayed
    Y J Blumenfeld
    Journal of Perinatology, 2014, 34 : 95 - 99
12345