The GovTech Challenge - GovTech and Public Value Creation

被引:0
|
作者
Bharosa, Nitesh [1 ]
Janowski, Tomasz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Gdansk Univ Technol, Gdansk, Poland
[3] Univ Continuing Educ Krems, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
关键词
GovTech; public services; public value creation; AI; data wallets; trust frameworks; ecosystem building; digital governance; digital government architecture; digital transformation;
D O I
10.1145/3657054.3659125
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Governments struggle to harness emerging technologies to improve public services, address social needs, and produce public value. In response, we see a rise in GovTech startups and other non-government actors trying to bring innovative solutions to governments. While some public agencies welcome such help, many are reluctant to rely on external organizations to provide digital identities, data wallets and AI-based services to citizens, businesses, and the government itself. Many also fear engaging a dynamic ecosystem of small non-government actors working together and gaining more experience in the process. Consequently, the GovTech supply and demand are misaligned with each other and the public value imperative. Public tendering may help but does not protect against vendor lock-in and innovation-blocking. Co-creation of public and private solutions may be technically possible but may face institutional void, calling for trust frameworks, steward-ownership, ecosystem building or other alternative instruments. This paper presents a research challenge to examine GovTech evidence, learn about applicable theories, methods and knowledge gaps, and formulate theoretically and empirically well-grounded recommendations on GovTech and public value creation. It also outlines the response to the challenge: organizing a dg.o 2024 workshop and developing a special issue of Government Information Quarterly (GIQ).
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1045
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Co-Production Lead to the Creation of Public Value? Balancing the Dimensions of Public Value Creation in Urban Mobility Planning
    Jaspers, Sylke
    Steen, Trui
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2021, 53 (04) : 619 - 646
  • [22] Telework and public value creation: Evidence from Mexican public officials
    Garcia-Contreras, Rigoberto
    Munoz-Chavez, J. Patricia
    Valle-Cruz, David
    Ruvalcaba-Gomez, Edgar A.
    Becerra-Santiago, Jose Alberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [23] The challenge in Asia: Finding best value-creation potential
    Redmond, T
    Bloy, N
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1996, 94 (46) : 58 - &
  • [24] Challenge in Asia: Finding best value-creation potential
    Boston Consulting Group Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    [J]. Oil Gas J, 46
  • [25] Legitimated consumption: a socially embedded challenge for entrepreneurs' value creation
    Niemi, Laura
    Kantola, Jenni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2018, 20 (02) : 214 - 228
  • [26] The Particular Applicability of Public Value Creation to Local Government
    Grant, Bligh James
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2021, 44 (10) : 835 - 844
  • [27] SUSTAINING E-PARTICIPATION FOR PUBLIC VALUE CREATION
    Romanelli, Mauro
    [J]. STRATEGICA: CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO IN MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2018, : 1273 - 1282
  • [28] Cultural Strategies and Public Value Creation: Empirical Evidence
    Angiola, Nunzio
    Bianchi, Piervito
    Marino, Roberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 36 (07) : 492 - 504
  • [29] Understanding Public Value Creation in the Delivery of Electronic Services
    Luna-Reyes, Luis F.
    Sandoval-Almazan, Rodrigo
    Puron-Cid, Gabriel
    Picazo-Vela, Sergio
    Luna, Dolores E.
    Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT (EGOV 2017), 2017, 10428 : 378 - 385
  • [30] Public value creation through information technologies in government
    Luna-Reyes, Luis F.
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. TRANSFORMING GOVERNMENT- PEOPLE PROCESS AND POLICY, 2023, 17 (02) : 173 - 176