Adaptive spatiotemporal management to reduce shark bycatch in tuna fisheries

被引:0
|
作者
Crespo, Guillermo Ortuno [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Griffiths, Shane [4 ]
Murua, Hilario [5 ]
Osterblom, Henrik [3 ]
Lopez, Jon [4 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, IUCN World Commiss Protected Areas High Seas Speci, Albanovagen 28, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Albanovagen 28, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Inter Amer Trop Tuna Commiss IATTC, La Jolla, CA USA
[5] Int Seafood Sustainabil Fdn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
bycatch; closure; eastern tropical pacific; fisheries; shark; spatiotemporal management; tuna; LONGLINE; REPRODUCTION; CATCHES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Purse-seine tropical tuna fishing in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (EPO) results in the bycatch of several sensitive species groups, including elasmobranchs. Effective ecosystem management balances conservation and resource use and requires considering trade-offs and synergies. Seasonal and adaptive spatial measures can reduce fisheries impacts on nontarget species while maintaining or increasing target catches. Identifying persistently high-risk areas in the open ocean, where dynamic environmental conditions drive changes in species' distributions, is essential for exploring the impact of fisheries closures. We used fisheries observer data collected from 1995 to 2021 to explore the spatiotemporal persistence of areas of high bycatch risk for 2 species of oceanic sharks, silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis) and oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus), and of low tuna catch rates. We analyzed data collected by fisheries scientific observers onboard approximately 200 large purse-seine vessels operating in the EPO under 10 different flags. Fishing effort, catch, and bycatch data were aggregated spatially and temporally at 1 degrees x 1 degrees cells and monthly, respectively. When areas of high fishing inefficiency were closed the entire study period and effort was reallocated proportionally to reflect historical effort patterns, yearly tuna catch appeared to increase by 1-11%, whereas bycatch of silky and oceanic whitetip sharks decreased by 10-19% and 9%, respectively. Prior to fishing effort redistribution, bycatch reductions accrued to 21-41% and 14% for silky and oceanic whitetip sharks, respectively. Our results are consistent with previous findings and demonstrate the high potential for reducing elasmobranch bycatch in the EPO without compromising catch rates of target tuna species. They also highlight the need to consider new dynamic and adaptive management measures to more efficiently fulfill conservation and sustainability objectives for exploited resources in the EPO.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting bycatch hotspots in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries at the basin scale
    Mannocci, Laura
    Forget, Fabien
    Tolotti, Mariana Travassos
    Bach, Pascal
    Bez, Nicolas
    Demarcq, Herve
    Kaplan, David
    Sabarros, Philippe
    Simier, Monique
    Capello, Manuela
    Dagorn, Laurent
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 24
  • [22] Tuna longline fisheries off southern Africa: the need to limit seabird bycatch
    Ryan, PG
    Boix-Hinzen, C
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1998, 94 (04) : 179 - 182
  • [23] Trade-Offs in the Design of Fishery Closures: Management of Silky Shark Bycatch in the Eastern Pacific Ocean Tuna Fishery
    Watson, Jordan T.
    Essington, Timothy E.
    Lennert-Cody, Cleridy E.
    Hall, Martin A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (03) : 626 - 635
  • [24] Estimating trends and magnitudes of bycatch in the tuna fisheries of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean
    Peatman, Tom
    Allain, Valerie
    Bell, Lui
    Muller, Berry
    Panizza, Aurelien
    Phillip, Naiten B.
    Pilling, Graham
    Nicol, Simon
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2023, 24 (05) : 812 - 828
  • [25] Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries
    Melvin, EF
    Parrish, JK
    Conquest, LL
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (06) : 1386 - 1397
  • [26] Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries
    Melvin, EF
    Parrish, JK
    Conquest, LL
    SEABIRD BYCATCH: TRENDS,ROADBLOCKS AND SOLUTIONS, 2001, 2001 (01): : 161 - 184
  • [27] Off the hook? Initiatives to reduce seabird bycatch in longline fisheries
    Cooper, J
    Croxall, JP
    Rivera, KS
    SEABIRD BYCATCH: TRENDS,ROADBLOCKS AND SOLUTIONS, 2001, 2001 (01): : 9 - 32
  • [28] Alternative codends to reduce bycatch in Chilean crustacean trawl fisheries
    Queirolo, Dante
    Erzini, Karim
    Hurtado, Carlos F.
    Ahumada, Mauricio
    Soriguer, Milagrosa C.
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2011, 110 (01) : 18 - 28
  • [29] Policy pathways to reduce disproportionate burdens in tuna fisheries
    Haas, Bianca
    Azmi, Kamal
    Sinan, Hussain
    Hanich, Quentin
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2024, 25 (03) : 542 - 548
  • [30] Science and management of shark fisheries - Introduction
    Hueter, RE
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1998, 39 (02) : 105 - 105