Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries

被引:0
|
作者
Melvin, EF [1 ]
Parrish, JK [1 ]
Conquest, LL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Washingtom Sea Grant Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
We examined several strategies to reduce seabird bycatch, primarily of Common Murres (Uria aalge) and Rhinoceros Auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata), in a coastal salmon drift gillnet fishery in Puget Sound, Washington (USA). Our goal was a significant reduction in seabird bycatch without a concomitant reduction in target catch or an increase in the bycatch of any other species. We compared fish catch and seabird bycatch in nets modified to include visual alerts (highly visible netting in the upper net) or acoustic alerts (pingers) to traditional monofilament nets set throughout the normal fishing hours over a five-week fishing season. Catch and bycatch varied significantly as a function of gear. With monofilament controls, murres responded to both visual and acoustic alerts; auklets and sockeye salmon responded to deeper visual alerts only. Seabird abundance varied across multiple temporal scales: interannually, within fishing season, and within day. At the interannual level, seabird entanglement was linked to regional abundance on the fishing grounds, a pattern which broke down at the local level. Within season, sockeye and murre abundance were negatively correlated, suggesting that if fishery openings were scheduled on peak abundance of the target species, seabird bycatch would be significantly reduced as a function of increased target fishing efficiency. Finally, both sockeye catch and auklet entanglement were highest at dawn, whereas murre entanglement was high at both dawn and dusk. Our results identify three complementary tools to reduce seabird bycatch in the Puget Sound drift gillnet fishery-gear modifications, abundance-based fishery openings, and time of day restrictions-for a possible reduction in seabird bycatch of up to 70-75% without a significant reduction in target fishing efficiency. Although these tools are based on local conditions and will thus vary among years and locations, all might be exportable to other coastal gillnet fisheries worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 184
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel tools to reduce seabird bycatch in coastal gillnet fisheries
    Melvin, EF
    Parrish, JK
    Conquest, LL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1999, 13 (06) : 1386 - 1397
  • [2] Reducing seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries
    Bull, Leigh S.
    [J]. FISH AND FISHERIES, 2007, 8 (01) : 31 - 56
  • [3] Assessing seabird bycatch in gillnet fisheries using electronic monitoring
    Glemarec, Gildas
    Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
    Lundgaard, Louise Scherffenberg
    Larsen, Finn
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 243
  • [4] Spatial and temporal variations in seabird bycatch: Incidental bycatch in the Norwegian coastal gillnet-fishery
    Baerum, Kim Magnus
    Anker-Nilssen, Tycho
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Signe
    Fangel, Kirstin
    Williams, Tom
    Volstad, Jon Helge
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [5] Assessing bycatch risk from gillnet fisheries for three species of diving seabird in the UK
    Cleasby, Ian R.
    Wilson, Linda J.
    Crawford, Rory
    Owen, Ellie
    Rouxel, Yann
    Bolton, Mark
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2022, 684 : 157 - 179
  • [6] Off the hook? Initiatives to reduce seabird bycatch in longline fisheries
    Cooper, J
    Croxall, JP
    Rivera, KS
    [J]. SEABIRD BYCATCH: TRENDS,ROADBLOCKS AND SOLUTIONS, 2001, 2001 (01): : 9 - 32
  • [7] What's the catch with lumpsuckers? A North Atlantic study of seabird bycatch in lumpsucker gillnet fisheries
    Christensen-Dalsgaard, Signe
    Anker-Nilssen, Tycho
    Crawford, Rory
    Bond, Alexander
    Sigurdsson, Gudjon Mar
    Glemarec, Gildas
    Hansen, Erpur Snaer
    Kadin, Martina
    Kindt-Larsen, Lotte
    Mallory, Mark
    Merkel, Flemming Ravn
    Petersen, Aevar
    Provencher, Jennifer
    Baerum, Kim Magnus
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 240
  • [8] Best practices to mitigate seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries-efficiency and practical applicability
    Lokkeborg, Svein
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2011, 435 : 285 - 303
  • [9] Seabird bycatch in a Baltic coastal gillnet fishery is orders of magnitude larger than official reports
    Morkunas, Julius
    Oppel, Steffen
    Bruzas, Modestas
    Rouxel, Yann
    Morkune, Rasa
    Mitchell, Daniel
    [J]. AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01)
  • [10] Acoustic alarms reduce bycatch of harbour porpoises in Danish North Sea gillnet fisheries
    Larsen, Finn
    Eigaard, Ole R.
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2014, 153 : 108 - 112