Data-scarce surrogate modeling of shock-induced pore collapse process

被引:0
|
作者
Cheung, S. W. [1 ]
Choi, Y. [1 ]
Springer, H. K. [2 ]
Kadeethum, T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Ctr Appl Sci Comp, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Energet Mat Ctr, Mat Sci Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[3] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
关键词
Pore collapse; Shock physics; Reduced-order modeling; Machine learning; REDUCED-ORDER MODELS; EQUATION-OF-STATE; BALANCED-TRUNCATION; NONLINEAR MODEL; REDUCTION; DECOMPOSITION; APPROXIMATION; EXPLICIT;
D O I
10.1007/s00193-024-01177-2
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Understanding the mechanisms of shock-induced pore collapse is of great interest in various disciplines in sciences and engineering, including materials science, biological sciences, and geophysics. However, numerical modeling of the complex pore collapse processes can be costly. To this end, a strong need exists to develop surrogate models for generating economic predictions of pore collapse processes. In this work, we study the use of a data-driven reduced-order model, namely dynamic mode decomposition, and a deep generative model, namely conditional generative adversarial networks, to resemble the numerical simulations of the pore collapse process at representative training shock pressures. Since the simulations are expensive, the training data are scarce, which makes training an accurate surrogate model challenging. To overcome the difficulties posed by the complex physics phenomena, we make several crucial treatments to the plain original form of the methods to increase the capability of approximating and predicting the dynamics. In particular, physics information is used as indicators or conditional inputs to guide the prediction. In realizing these methods, the training of each dynamic mode composition model takes only around 30 s on CPU. In contrast, training a generative adversarial network model takes 8 h on GPU. Moreover, using dynamic mode decomposition, the final-time relative error is around 0.3% in the reproductive cases. We also demonstrate the predictive power of the methods at unseen testing shock pressures, where the error ranges from 1.3 to 5% in the interpolatory cases and 8 to 9% in extrapolatory cases.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 256
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Event-based uncertainty assessment of sediment modeling in a data-scarce catchment
    Xie, Hui
    Wei, Guoyuan
    Shen, Zhenyao
    Dong, Jianwei
    Peng, Yexuan
    Chen, Xinquan
    CATENA, 2019, 173 : 162 - 174
  • [32] Modeling Groundwater Resources in Data-Scarce Regions for Sustainable Management: Methodologies and Limits
    Borzi, Iolanda
    HYDROLOGY, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [33] Integrated hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling to assess water exchange in a data-scarce reservoir
    Wu, Binbin
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Wang, Zhonggen
    Liu, Changming
    Ma, Jianming
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 555 : 15 - 30
  • [34] Hydrological modeling as a tool for water resources management of the data-scarce Brahmaputra basin
    Dutta, Pulendra
    Sarma, Arup Kumar
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (01) : 152 - 165
  • [35] Impact of Shock-Induced Lipid Nanobubble Collapse on a Phospholipid Membrane
    Sun, Dandan
    Lin, Xubo
    Zhang, Zuoheng
    Gu, Ning
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2016, 120 (33): : 18803 - 18810
  • [36] Shock-induced collapse of a vapor nanobubble near solid boundaries
    Magaletti, Francesco
    Gallo, Mirko
    Marino, Luca
    Casciola, Carlo Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2016, 84 : 34 - 45
  • [37] Comparison of multiphase models for computing shock-induced bubble collapse
    Goncalves Da Silva, Eric
    Parnaudeau, Philippe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR HEAT & FLUID FLOW, 2020, 30 (08) : 3845 - 3877
  • [38] Mechanochemistry of shock-induced nanobubble collapse near silica in water
    Nomura, K.
    Kalia, R. K.
    Nakano, A.
    Vashishta, P.
    van Duin, A. C. T.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2012, 101 (07)
  • [39] Molecular dynamics simulation of shock-induced microscopic bubble collapse
    Zhan, Shengpeng
    Duan, Haitao
    Pan, Lin
    Tu, Jiesong
    Jia, Dan
    Yang, Tian
    Li, Jian
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 23 (14) : 8446 - 8455
  • [40] Atomistic mechanism of shock-induced void collapse in nanoporous metals
    Erhart, P
    Bringa, EM
    Kumar, M
    Albe, K
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2005, 72 (05)