Data-scarce surrogate modeling of shock-induced pore collapse process

被引:0
|
作者
Cheung, S. W. [1 ]
Choi, Y. [1 ]
Springer, H. K. [2 ]
Kadeethum, T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Ctr Appl Sci Comp, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Energet Mat Ctr, Mat Sci Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[3] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
关键词
Pore collapse; Shock physics; Reduced-order modeling; Machine learning; REDUCED-ORDER MODELS; EQUATION-OF-STATE; BALANCED-TRUNCATION; NONLINEAR MODEL; REDUCTION; DECOMPOSITION; APPROXIMATION; EXPLICIT;
D O I
10.1007/s00193-024-01177-2
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Understanding the mechanisms of shock-induced pore collapse is of great interest in various disciplines in sciences and engineering, including materials science, biological sciences, and geophysics. However, numerical modeling of the complex pore collapse processes can be costly. To this end, a strong need exists to develop surrogate models for generating economic predictions of pore collapse processes. In this work, we study the use of a data-driven reduced-order model, namely dynamic mode decomposition, and a deep generative model, namely conditional generative adversarial networks, to resemble the numerical simulations of the pore collapse process at representative training shock pressures. Since the simulations are expensive, the training data are scarce, which makes training an accurate surrogate model challenging. To overcome the difficulties posed by the complex physics phenomena, we make several crucial treatments to the plain original form of the methods to increase the capability of approximating and predicting the dynamics. In particular, physics information is used as indicators or conditional inputs to guide the prediction. In realizing these methods, the training of each dynamic mode composition model takes only around 30 s on CPU. In contrast, training a generative adversarial network model takes 8 h on GPU. Moreover, using dynamic mode decomposition, the final-time relative error is around 0.3% in the reproductive cases. We also demonstrate the predictive power of the methods at unseen testing shock pressures, where the error ranges from 1.3 to 5% in the interpolatory cases and 8 to 9% in extrapolatory cases.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 256
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Atomistic modeling of shock-induced void collapse in copper -: art. no. 161902
    Dávila, LP
    Erhart, P
    Bringa, EM
    Meyers, MA
    Lubarda, VA
    Schneider, MS
    Becker, R
    Kumar, M
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 86 (16) : 1 - 3
  • [22] Development of Strategy for SWAT Hydrologic Modeling in Data-Scarce Regions of Peru
    Daneshvar, Fariborz
    Frankenberger, Jane R.
    Bowling, Laura C.
    Cherkauer, Keith A.
    Moraes, Andre G. de Lima
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (07)
  • [23] Atomistic insight into the shock-induced bubble collapse in water
    Rawat, Sunil
    Mitra, Nilanjan
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (09)
  • [24] Shock-induced collapse of a gas bubble in shockwave lithotripsy
    Johnsen, Eric
    Colonius, Tim
    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008, 124 (04): : 2011 - 2020
  • [25] Poration of lipid bilayers by shock-induced nanobubble collapse
    Choubey, Amit
    Vedadi, Mohammad
    Nomura, Ken-ichi
    Kalia, Rajiv K.
    Nakano, Aiichiro
    Vashishta, Priya
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2011, 98 (02)
  • [26] Shock-induced collapse of a gas bubble in shockwave lithotripsy
    Johnsen, Eric
    Colonius, Tim
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 124 (04): : 2011 - 2020
  • [27] Shock-induced collapse of a bubble inside a deformable vessel
    Coralic, Vedran
    Colonius, Tim
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS, 2013, 40 : 64 - 74
  • [28] Poration of Lipid Bilayers by Shock-Induced Nanobubble Collapse
    Nomura, Ken-ichi
    Choubey, Amit
    Vedadi, Mohammad
    Kalia, Rajiv K.
    Nakano, Aiichiro
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 102 (03) : 729A - 729A
  • [29] Structure and Dynamics of Shock-Induced Nanobubble Collapse in Water
    Vedadi, M.
    Choubey, A.
    Nomura, K.
    Kalia, R. K.
    Nakano, A.
    Vashishta, P.
    van Duin, A. C. T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 105 (01)
  • [30] DATA-SCARCE CONDITION MODELING REQUIRES MODEL-BASED PRIOR REGULARIZATION
    Mutsam, Nikolaus
    Fuchs, Alexander
    Ziegler, Fabio
    Pernkopf, Franz
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, ICASSP 2024, 2024, : 6695 - 6699