Behavior of MSE wall under static load with different strips shapes

被引:0
|
作者
Falah M.W. [1 ,2 ]
Muteb H.H. [1 ]
Al-Khafaji Z. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Hillah
[2] Building and Construction Techniques Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Engineering Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon
[3] New Era and Development in Civil Engineering Research Group, Scientific Research Center, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar
[4] Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM, Selangor, Bangi
关键词
Geosynthetics; Lateral pressure; LVDT; MSE; Soil; Vertical pressure;
D O I
10.1007/s41024-024-00430-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
MSE walls are deemed highly suitable for challenging foundation soil conditions characterised by anticipated differential settlements due to their inherent flexibility and mechanical redundancy. Typically, MSE retaining walls are composed of structural fill material reinforced with inclusions capable of withstanding tensile forces, which are interconnected with facing elements. The mechanical interactions among the three components of the reinforced soil structure, namely the fill material, reinforcement, and facing, are responsible for ensuring its internal stability. Accordingly, the current research aims to study the behaviour of MSE walls under static load. The working methodology of the study focuses on simulating the MSE wall simplified model approximately. The model enables the investigation of many parameters; Zigzag shape and Straight shape; for that, two specimens are built and tested approximately. This research used two shapes of soil strengthened; the first one is the zigzag type, and the second one is the straight type. After applying static load, we recorded lateral soil pressure, vertical soil pressure, strip strains, concrete strain, and lateral displacement of panels. The results showed that the zigzag shape is better than the straight shape. The results show that the zigzag shape is better than the straight shape on the stability of the MSE wall; the zigzag shape gave small lateral displacement and less pressure effect than the straight shape by 19% in lateral pressure, While the zigzag shape gives better results than straight shape by 60% in vertical pressure. Also, using of zigzag strips reinforcement give lower displacement in MSE wall than straight strips. In addition to that using both kinds of soil strips reinforcement led to decrease later displacement with depth. And the straight shape gives better results than zigzag shape by 50% in reducing the displacement. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental study on the reinforced fly ash and sand retaining wall under static load
    Li, Li-Hua
    Yu, Chang-Dao
    Xiao, Heng-Lin
    Feng, Wei-Qiang
    Ma, Qiang
    Yin, Jian-Hua
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 248
  • [32] Experimental study on the reinforced fly ash and sand retaining wall under static load
    Li, Li-Hua
    Yu, Chang-Dao
    Xiao, Heng-Lin
    Feng, Wei-Qiang
    Ma, Qiang
    Yin, Jian-Hua
    Feng, Wei-Qiang (wqfeng@polyu.edu.hk), 1600, Elsevier Ltd (248):
  • [33] Hysteretic behavior of retrofitted RC shear wall with different damage levels by using steel strips
    Ozdemir, Anil
    Kopraman, Yagmur
    Anil, Ozgur
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44
  • [34] The behavior of piles in clay during STATNAMIC and different static load testing procedures
    Hajduk, EL
    Paikowsky, SG
    Mullins, G
    Lewis, C
    Ealy, CD
    Hourani, NM
    STATNAMIC LOADING TEST, 2000, : 59 - 73
  • [35] Behavior of BFRP strips confined PVC tubes with internal fillers under axial compressive load
    Li, Yongjian
    Li, Chao
    Yu, Zhicheng
    Han, Tianhao
    Yuan, Jiyu
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 58
  • [36] Behavior of RC columns strengthened with steel jacket under static axial load
    Ghoneim, Abd Rahman Mujahid Ahmed
    Mohamed, Mohamed Mahmoud Ahmed
    Haridy, Kader
    Ahmed, Hazem
    Pyram, Mohmmad
    Khalf, Abdu
    ARCHIVES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 69 (02) : 367 - 379
  • [37] CRACK-PROPAGATION BEHAVIOR OF POLYCRYSTALLINE ALUMINA UNDER STATIC AND CYCLIC LOAD
    KISHIMOTO, H
    UENO, A
    OKAWARA, S
    KAWAMOTO, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 1994, 77 (05) : 1324 - 1328
  • [38] Bond behavior of interface between CFL and concrete under static and fatigue load
    Zheng, X. H.
    Huang, P. Y.
    Han, Q.
    Chen, G. M.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2014, 52 : 33 - 41
  • [39] Static and cyclic behavior of wooden frames with tenon joints under lateral load
    Seo, JM
    Choi, IK
    Lee, JR
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (03): : 344 - 349
  • [40] Evaluation behavior of Qing Shan concrete bridge under static load test
    Hussain, Haleem K.
    Zhang, Lianzhen
    Liu, Gui Wei
    Li, Yongxue
    Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 2011, 3 (07) : 677 - 688