Behavior of MSE wall under static load with different strips shapes

被引:0
|
作者
Falah M.W. [1 ,2 ]
Muteb H.H. [1 ]
Al-Khafaji Z. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Hillah
[2] Building and Construction Techniques Engineering Department, College of Engineering and Engineering Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon
[3] New Era and Development in Civil Engineering Research Group, Scientific Research Center, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar
[4] Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM, Selangor, Bangi
关键词
Geosynthetics; Lateral pressure; LVDT; MSE; Soil; Vertical pressure;
D O I
10.1007/s41024-024-00430-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
MSE walls are deemed highly suitable for challenging foundation soil conditions characterised by anticipated differential settlements due to their inherent flexibility and mechanical redundancy. Typically, MSE retaining walls are composed of structural fill material reinforced with inclusions capable of withstanding tensile forces, which are interconnected with facing elements. The mechanical interactions among the three components of the reinforced soil structure, namely the fill material, reinforcement, and facing, are responsible for ensuring its internal stability. Accordingly, the current research aims to study the behaviour of MSE walls under static load. The working methodology of the study focuses on simulating the MSE wall simplified model approximately. The model enables the investigation of many parameters; Zigzag shape and Straight shape; for that, two specimens are built and tested approximately. This research used two shapes of soil strengthened; the first one is the zigzag type, and the second one is the straight type. After applying static load, we recorded lateral soil pressure, vertical soil pressure, strip strains, concrete strain, and lateral displacement of panels. The results showed that the zigzag shape is better than the straight shape. The results show that the zigzag shape is better than the straight shape on the stability of the MSE wall; the zigzag shape gave small lateral displacement and less pressure effect than the straight shape by 19% in lateral pressure, While the zigzag shape gives better results than straight shape by 60% in vertical pressure. Also, using of zigzag strips reinforcement give lower displacement in MSE wall than straight strips. In addition to that using both kinds of soil strips reinforcement led to decrease later displacement with depth. And the straight shape gives better results than zigzag shape by 50% in reducing the displacement. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experimental Behavior of RC Columns, Confined with Stirrup and Strips, Under Cyclic Axial Load
    M. Fiaz Tahir
    Qaiser-Uz-Zaman Khan
    M. Rizwan
    M. Ashraf
    M. Yaqub
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39 : 3449 - 3460
  • [22] DEFORMATION-BEHAVIOR OF PLASTICS UNDER BIAXIAL-STATIC LOAD
    SARABI, B
    KUNSTSTOFFE-GERMAN PLASTICS, 1986, 76 (02): : 182 - 186
  • [23] Crack propagation behavior of polycrystalline alumina under static and cyclic load
    Kishimoto, Hidehiro
    Ueno, Akira
    Okawara, Seiji
    Kawamoto, Hiroshi
    Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1994, 77 (05): : 1324 - 1328
  • [24] Laterally-loaded pile-MSE wall system performance under different design configurations
    Mohammed, W.
    Han, J.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 29 (02) : 116 - 136
  • [25] Factors Affecting the Stability and Behavior of an MSE Wall: A Numerical Approach
    Islam, Md Azijul
    Jeet, Abhijeet Acharjee
    Gupta, Niloy
    Gupta, Alinda
    Islam, Tahsina
    GEO-CONGRESS 2022: DEEP FOUNDATIONS, EARTH RETENTION, AND UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 332 : 375 - 385
  • [26] Load displacement behavior of concrete beam under monotonic static and low velocity impact load
    Anil, Ö., 1600, Iran University of Science and Technology (12):
  • [27] Load displacement behavior of concrete beam under monotonic static and low velocity impact load
    Yilmaz, M. C.
    Anil, O.
    Alyavuz, B.
    Kantar, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 12 (4A) : 488 - 503
  • [28] A comparison of geogrid strips and metallic reinforcing strips under static and repeated loading
    Touahmia, M
    Rouili, A
    Hanna, TH
    GEOSYNTHETICS ASIS'97 (SELECT PAPERS), 1998, : 337 - 341
  • [29] Behavior of strengthened reinforced concrete beams under different CFRP strips arrangement
    Mourad Boutlikht
    Noureddine Lahbari
    Seifeddine Tabchouche
    Kamel Hebbache
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2022, 7
  • [30] Behavior of strengthened reinforced concrete beams under different CFRP strips arrangement
    Boutlikht, Mourad
    Lahbari, Noureddine
    Tabchouche, Seifeddine
    Hebbache, Kamel
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2022, 7 (03)