A rapid mixed-methods assessment of Libya's primary care system

被引:0
|
作者
Allen, Luke N. [1 ]
Hatefi, Arian [2 ]
Kak, Mohini [3 ]
Herbst, Christopher H. [4 ]
Mallender, Jacqueline [5 ]
Karem, Ghassan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Ctr Global Primary Care, Oxford, England
[2] World Bank, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] World Bank, Tunis, Tunisia
[4] World Bank, MENA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Econ Design, London, England
[6] PHC Inst, Tripoli, Libya
关键词
Libya; Primary care; Health systems; Primary health care; Service delivery; Global health; Mixed-methods; Background; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-024-11121-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Libya has experienced decades of violent conflict that have severely disrupted health service delivery. The Government of National Unity is committed to rebuilding a resilient health system built on a platform of strong primary care.Aim Commissioned by the government, we set out to perform a rapid assessment of the system as it stands and identify areas for improvement.Design and setting We used a rapid applied policy explanatory-sequential mixed-methods design, working with Libyan data and Libyan policymakers, with supporting interview data from other primary care policymakers working across the Middle East and North Africa region.Method We used the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative framework to structure our assessment. Review of policy documents and secondary analysis of WHO and World Bank survey data informed a series of targeted policymaker interviews. We used deductive framework analysis to synthesise our findings.Results We identified 11 key documents and six key policymakers to interview. Libya has strong policy commitments to providing good quality primary care, and a high number of health staff and facilities. Access to services and trust in providers is high. However, a third of facilities are non-operational; there is a marked skew towards axillary and administrative staff; and structural challenges with financing, logistics, and standards has led to highly variable provision of care.Conclusion In reforming the primary care system, the government should consolidate leadership, clarify governance structures and systems, and focus on setting national standards for human resources for health, facilities, stocks, and clinical care.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementing post diagnostic dementia care in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Frost, Rachael
    Rait, Greta
    Aw, Su
    Brunskill, Greta
    Wilcock, Jane
    Robinson, Louise
    Knapp, Martin
    Hogan, Nicole
    Harrison Dening, Karen
    Allan, Louise
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Walters, Kate
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 25 (08) : 1381 - 1394
  • [22] Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study
    Lay Hoon Goh
    Anna Szücs
    Chiew Jiat Rosalind Siah
    Monica A Lazarus
    E Shyong Tai
    Jose M Valderas
    Doris Yee Ling Young
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [23] Health care professionals' perceptions about atrial fibrillation care in the Brazilian public primary care system: a mixed-methods study
    Paschoal, Elisabete
    Gooden, Tiffany E.
    Olmos, Rodrigo D.
    Lotufo, Paulo A.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Manaseki-Holland, Semira
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Thomas, G. Neil
    Jolly, Kate C.
    Lancashire, Emma
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Greenfield, Sheila
    Goulart, Alessandra C.
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] Health care professionals’ perceptions about atrial fibrillation care in the Brazilian public primary care system: a mixed-methods study
    Elisabete Paschoal
    Tiffany E. Gooden
    Rodrigo D. Olmos
    Paulo A. Lotufo
    Isabela M. Benseñor
    Semira Manaseki-Holland
    Gregory Y. H. Lip
    G. Neil Thomas
    Kate Jolly
    Emma Lancashire
    Deirdre A. Lane
    Sheila Greenfield
    Alessandra C. Goulart
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [25] PHC Progression Model: a novel mixed-methods tool for measuring primary health care system capacity
    Ratcliffe, Hannah L.
    Schwarz, Dan
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Cejas, Cintia
    Diallo, Abdoulaye
    Garcia Elorrio, Ezequiel
    Fifield, Jocelyn
    Gashumba, Diane
    Hartshorn, Lucy
    Leydon, Nicholas
    Mohamed, Mohamed
    Nakamura, Yoriko
    Ndiaye, Youssoupha
    Novignon, Jacob
    Ofosu, Anthony
    Roder-DeWan, Sanam
    Rwiyereka, Angelique
    Secci, Federica
    Veillard, Jeremy H.
    Bitton, Asaf
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (05):
  • [26] Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Mentoring Program
    Harker, Karen
    O'toole, Erin
    Keshmiripour, Setareh
    McIntosh, Marcia
    Sassen, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 59 (08) : 873 - 902
  • [27] Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment
    Misra, Anjali J.
    Ong, Shawn Y.
    Gokhale, Arjun
    Khan, Sameer
    Melnick, Edward R.
    JAMIA OPEN, 2019, 2 (04) : 447 - 455
  • [28] Novel multi-virus rapid respiratory microbiological point-of-care testing in primary care: a mixed-methods feasibility evaluation
    Khalid, Tanzeela Y.
    Duncan, Lorna J.
    Thornton, Hannah, V
    Lasseter, Gemma
    Muir, Peter
    Toney, Zara Abigail
    Hay, Alastair D.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2021, 38 (05) : 598 - 605
  • [29] Translating a walking intervention for health professional delivery within primary care: A mixed-methods treatment fidelity assessment
    Williams, Stefanie L.
    McSharry, Jennifer
    Taylor, Claire
    Dale, Jeremy
    Michie, Susan
    French, David P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 25 (01) : 17 - 38
  • [30] A mixed-methods characterisation of patient safety incidents by primary eye care practitioners
    MacFarlane, Elinor
    Carson-Stevens, Andrew
    North, Rachel
    Ryan, Barbara
    Acton, Jennifer
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2022, 42 (06) : 1304 - 1315