Mixed-Methods Assessment of a Mentoring Program

A continuous cycle of mixed-methods assessment contributes to the success of a mentoring program, as shown in this case study from a large academic library. Assessment instruments include the mentoring competencies assessment, the fear of negative evaluation scale, a satisfaction survey and a focus group. Assessment results reveal that the mentoring program is meeting its goals of contributing to the professional development of proteges, improving mentor competencies, increasing confidence of participants, and expanding participation in the program.