Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization via Transradial Access versus Transfemoral Access

被引:1
|
作者
Richardson, Andrew J. [1 ]
Kumar, Jessica [2 ]
Richardson, Kenneth [2 ]
Bhatia, Ansh [2 ]
Pennix, Thomas [1 ]
Shah, Khushi [2 ]
Maini, Aneesha [2 ]
Jalaeian, Hamed [2 ]
Bhatia, Shivank [2 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 1611 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Intervent Radiol, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; SINGLE-CENTER; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2023.09.036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare prostatic artery embolization (PAE) via transradial access (TRA-PAE) versus transfemoral access (TFA-PAE) to assist access selection. Material and Methods: Procedural outcomes and adverse events were evaluated in 998 patients who underwent PAE at a single center from April 2014 to August 2022; 821 (82%) underwent TRA-PAE (Group R) and 177 (18%) underwent TFA-PAE (Group F). Mean age and prostate size of Groups R and F were 69.2 years (SD +/- 8.4) and 117.4 g (SD +/- 63.1) and 75.2 years (SD +/- 12.1) and 127.2 g (SD +/- 83.6), respectively ( P < .01 and P = .16; postpropensity matching: P = .38 and P = .35, respectively). Indications for PAE included lower urinary tract symptoms, acute or chronic urinary retention, and hematuria. Procedural and patient-specific metrics were reviewed. Technical success was defined as bilateral PAE. Adverse events were recorded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse events classification. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Results: Technical success was achieved in 798 (97.2%) patients in Group R and 165 (93.2%) patients in Group F. Mean procedural time, single- and continuous-rotation fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and air kerma were significantly lower in Group R than in Group F ( P < .001). Moreover, 6 (0.7%) patients in Group R and 9 (5.5%) patients in Group F had access site ecchymoses, whereas 5 (0.6%) patients in Group R and 6 (3.6%) in Group F had access site hematomas. Two patients experienced transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) after TRA-PAE and recovered without intervention. Two occult radial artery occlusions were noted, but no patient experienced hand ischemia. Conclusions: In a large single interventional radiologist cohort, TRA-PAE demonstrated similar technical success to that of TFA-PAE with lower access site hemorrhagic complications and radiation requirements; however, TIA and occult radial artery occlusions remain a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients With Previous History of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Amro, Ahmed
    Hirzallah, Hisham
    Leigh, Emilia
    Curtis, Zachary
    Amro, Mohammad
    Aqtash, Obadah
    Numan, Yazan
    Parsons, Julia
    Skaff, Paulina
    Akpanudo, Sutoidem
    Sayyed, Rameez
    El-Hamdani, Mehiar
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (04) : S14 - S14
  • [32] A Comparison of Transradial versus Transfemoral Access in Anterior Circulation Mechanical Thrombectomy.
    Chen, Stephanie H.
    Snelling, Brian
    Sur, Samir
    Shah, Sumedh
    McCarthy, David
    Luther, Evan
    Yavagal, Dileep
    Starke, Robert M.
    Peterson, Eric C.
    STROKE, 2019, 50
  • [33] Transradial Access is Associated With an Increased of Risk Catheter-Induced Coronary Artery Dissection Compared with Transfemoral Access
    Boland, Paul
    Simard, Trevor
    Pitcher, Ian
    Di Santo, Pietro
    Ramirez, Francisco
    Marbach, Jeffrey
    Russo, Juan
    Hibbert, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (13) : B300 - B301
  • [34] Early exploration of the economic impact of transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) for neurovascular procedures in Spain
    Gorriz, Antonio
    Paz, Carlos Rodriguez
    Tejedor, Yeray
    Fandino, Eduardo
    Garcia, Maria Jesus
    Lopez-Jurado, Alfonso Lopez-Frias
    Munoz, Pablo Tomas
    Paolillo, Rosa
    Ravest, Valeska Seguel
    Barranco-Pons, Roger
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 1445 - 1454
  • [35] Successful management of a case of refractory prostatic hematuria by prostate artery embolization via a brachial artery access
    Bhatia, Shivank
    Pereira, Keith
    Kably, Isaam
    Narayanan, Govindarajan
    Journal of Vascular Access, 2016, 17 (03): : E44 - E45
  • [36] Comparison of Transradial Access and Transfemoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly Population
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Bin
    Yang, Hantao
    Wang, Guiping
    Huang, Jinlong
    Li, Chen
    Zhao, Puyuan
    Yang, Liangliang
    Yang, Zhigang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 181 : E411 - E421
  • [37] Transradial Artery Access Complications
    Sandoval, Yader
    Bell, Malcolm R.
    Gulati, Rajiv
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (11)
  • [38] Hepatic radioembolization from transradial access: initial experience and comparison to transfemoral access
    Kis, Bela
    Mills, Matthew
    Hoffe, Sarah E.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 22 (05) : 444 - 449
  • [39] Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elfil, Mohamed
    Ghaith, Hazem S.
    Doheim, Mohamed F.
    Aboutaleb, Pakinam E.
    Romeo, Dominic
    Salem, Mohamed M.
    Aladawi, Mohammad
    Jankowitz, Brian T.
    Burkhardt, Jan-Karl
    Nguyen, Thanh N.
    Al-Mufti, Fawaz
    Nogueira, Raul G.
    STROKE-VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2023, 3 (04):
  • [40] Impact of Young Age and Gender on Outcomes of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access Coronary Angiography
    Singh, Kuljit
    Tavella, Rosanna
    Air, Tracy
    Worthley, Matthew
    Sinhal, Ajay
    Arstall, Margaret
    Zeitz, Christopher
    Beltrame, John
    ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 72 (03) : 228 - 235