Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization via Transradial Access versus Transfemoral Access

被引:1
|
作者
Richardson, Andrew J. [1 ]
Kumar, Jessica [2 ]
Richardson, Kenneth [2 ]
Bhatia, Ansh [2 ]
Pennix, Thomas [1 ]
Shah, Khushi [2 ]
Maini, Aneesha [2 ]
Jalaeian, Hamed [2 ]
Bhatia, Shivank [2 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 1611 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Intervent Radiol, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; SINGLE-CENTER; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2023.09.036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare prostatic artery embolization (PAE) via transradial access (TRA-PAE) versus transfemoral access (TFA-PAE) to assist access selection. Material and Methods: Procedural outcomes and adverse events were evaluated in 998 patients who underwent PAE at a single center from April 2014 to August 2022; 821 (82%) underwent TRA-PAE (Group R) and 177 (18%) underwent TFA-PAE (Group F). Mean age and prostate size of Groups R and F were 69.2 years (SD +/- 8.4) and 117.4 g (SD +/- 63.1) and 75.2 years (SD +/- 12.1) and 127.2 g (SD +/- 83.6), respectively ( P < .01 and P = .16; postpropensity matching: P = .38 and P = .35, respectively). Indications for PAE included lower urinary tract symptoms, acute or chronic urinary retention, and hematuria. Procedural and patient-specific metrics were reviewed. Technical success was defined as bilateral PAE. Adverse events were recorded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse events classification. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Results: Technical success was achieved in 798 (97.2%) patients in Group R and 165 (93.2%) patients in Group F. Mean procedural time, single- and continuous-rotation fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and air kerma were significantly lower in Group R than in Group F ( P < .001). Moreover, 6 (0.7%) patients in Group R and 9 (5.5%) patients in Group F had access site ecchymoses, whereas 5 (0.6%) patients in Group R and 6 (3.6%) in Group F had access site hematomas. Two patients experienced transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) after TRA-PAE and recovered without intervention. Two occult radial artery occlusions were noted, but no patient experienced hand ischemia. Conclusions: In a large single interventional radiologist cohort, TRA-PAE demonstrated similar technical success to that of TFA-PAE with lower access site hemorrhagic complications and radiation requirements; however, TIA and occult radial artery occlusions remain a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Transradial Versus Transfemoral Arterial Access in Liver Cancer Embolization: Randomized Trial to Assess Patient Satisfaction
    Yamada, Ricardo
    Bracewell, Stephen
    Bassaco, Beatriz
    Camacho, Juan
    Anderson, M. Bret
    Conrad, Andrew
    Lynn, Corie
    Burns, Paul
    Collins, Heather
    Guimaraes, Marcelo
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 29 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [12] Is Transradial Access a Replacement Technique for Transfemoral Access in Neurointervention?
    Chiu, A. H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (03) : 493 - 494
  • [13] Comparison of transradial and transfemoral access for transcatheter arterial embolization of iatrogenic renal hemorrhage
    Cao, Chuanwu
    Kim, So-Yeon
    Ha Kim, Gun
    Shin, Ji Hoon
    Nam, In Chul
    Alali, Meshari
    Chu, Hee Ho
    Ko, Heung-Kyu
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [14] Efficacy and Safety of "Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography" with Right Transradial Access versus Left Transradial Access and Femoral Access: a Retrospective Comparative Study
    Balaban, Yakup
    Akbas, Mustafa Haluk
    Akbas, Merih Leventyuz
    Ozerdem, Ali
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 34 (01) : 48 - 56
  • [15] Learning curves for transradial access versus transfemoral access in diagnostic cerebral angiography: a case series
    Tso, Michael K.
    Rajah, Gary B.
    Dossani, Rimal H.
    Meyer, Michael J.
    McPheeters, Matthew J.
    Vakharia, Kunal
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Snyder, Kenneth, V
    Levy, Elad, I
    Siddiqui, Adnan H.
    Davies, Jason M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2022, 14 (02) : 174 - +
  • [16] Transradial access chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in comparation with transfemoral access
    Du, Nan
    Yang, Min-Jie
    Ma, Jing-Qin
    Luo, Jian-Jun
    Zhang, Zi-Han
    Yu, Tian-Zhu
    Zheng, Zhi-Yuan
    Zhang, Wen
    Yan, Zhi-Ping
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (05) : 1795 - 1805
  • [17] Transradial versus transfemoral vascular access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Kovacevic, M.
    Petrovic, M.
    Jandric, V. Blagojevic
    Vulin, A.
    Ivanov, I.
    Cankovic, M.
    Ivanovic, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2017, 16 : S37 - S37
  • [18] Update on Transradial Access for Percutaneous Transcatheter Visceral Artery Embolization
    Chu, Hee Ho
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Shin, Ji Hoon
    Cho, Soo Buem
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (01) : 72 - 85
  • [19] Transradial versus transfemoral arterial access in DEB-TACE for carcinoma
    Ghosh, Abheek
    Gupta, Vikash
    Al Khalifah, Abdullah
    Akhter, Nabeel Mohsin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2022, 12
  • [20] Transradial access less risky than transfemoral access in PCI
    Bryony M. Mearns
    Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2012, 9 (2) : 66 - 66