Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization via Transradial Access versus Transfemoral Access

被引:1
|
作者
Richardson, Andrew J. [1 ]
Kumar, Jessica [2 ]
Richardson, Kenneth [2 ]
Bhatia, Ansh [2 ]
Pennix, Thomas [1 ]
Shah, Khushi [2 ]
Maini, Aneesha [2 ]
Jalaeian, Hamed [2 ]
Bhatia, Shivank [2 ]
机构
[1] Jackson Mem Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 1611 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Intervent Radiol, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL USA
关键词
TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; SINGLE-CENTER; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; HYPERPLASIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2023.09.036
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare prostatic artery embolization (PAE) via transradial access (TRA-PAE) versus transfemoral access (TFA-PAE) to assist access selection. Material and Methods: Procedural outcomes and adverse events were evaluated in 998 patients who underwent PAE at a single center from April 2014 to August 2022; 821 (82%) underwent TRA-PAE (Group R) and 177 (18%) underwent TFA-PAE (Group F). Mean age and prostate size of Groups R and F were 69.2 years (SD +/- 8.4) and 117.4 g (SD +/- 63.1) and 75.2 years (SD +/- 12.1) and 127.2 g (SD +/- 83.6), respectively ( P < .01 and P = .16; postpropensity matching: P = .38 and P = .35, respectively). Indications for PAE included lower urinary tract symptoms, acute or chronic urinary retention, and hematuria. Procedural and patient-specific metrics were reviewed. Technical success was defined as bilateral PAE. Adverse events were recorded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse events classification. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. Results: Technical success was achieved in 798 (97.2%) patients in Group R and 165 (93.2%) patients in Group F. Mean procedural time, single- and continuous-rotation fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and air kerma were significantly lower in Group R than in Group F ( P < .001). Moreover, 6 (0.7%) patients in Group R and 9 (5.5%) patients in Group F had access site ecchymoses, whereas 5 (0.6%) patients in Group R and 6 (3.6%) in Group F had access site hematomas. Two patients experienced transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) after TRA-PAE and recovered without intervention. Two occult radial artery occlusions were noted, but no patient experienced hand ischemia. Conclusions: In a large single interventional radiologist cohort, TRA-PAE demonstrated similar technical success to that of TFA-PAE with lower access site hemorrhagic complications and radiation requirements; however, TIA and occult radial artery occlusions remain a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 547
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commentary on the "Safety of Prostatic Artery Embolization via Transradial Access versus Transfemoral Access"
    McNamara, Katherine L.
    Picel, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (04) : 548 - 549
  • [2] Transradial versus transfemoral arterial access in the uterine artery embolization of fibroids
    Ghosh, Abheek
    Agnihotri, Tanvir
    Gupta, Vikash
    Sitwala, Palak
    Stanley, Monica
    Cai, Stephen
    Akhter, Nabeel Mohsin
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : e672 - e677
  • [3] Prostate Artery Embolization via Transradial or Transulnar versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
    Bhatia, Shivank
    Harward, Sardis H.
    Sinha, Vishal K.
    Narayanan, Govindarajan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06) : 898 - 905
  • [4] Prostatic Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms via Transradial Versus Transfemoral Artery Access: Single-Center Technical Outcomes
    Gil, Ryun
    Shim, Dong Jae
    Kim, Doyoung
    Lee, Dong Hwan
    Kim, Jung Jun
    Lee, Jung Whee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 23 (05) : 548 - 554
  • [5] A randomized comparison of transradial and transfemoral access in uterine artery embolization
    Khayrutdinov, Evgeny
    Vorontsov, Ivan
    Arablinskiy, Alexander
    Shcherbakov, Denis
    Gromov, Dmitry
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [6] Transradial versus transfemoral access: The dispute continues
    Postalian, Alexander
    Krajcer, Zvonimir
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 96 (02) : 296 - 297
  • [7] Transradial versus transfemoral access in carotid artery stenting: A meta-analysis
    Batista, Savio
    Oliveira, Leonardo de Barros
    Borges, Jordana
    Pinheiro, Agostinho C.
    Almeida Filho, Jose Alberto
    Santana, Lais Silva
    Bertani, Raphael
    Koester, Stefan
    Hanel, Ricardo
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023,
  • [8] Comparison of Transradial Artery versus Transfemoral Artery Access for Solumbra Technique in Mechanical Thrombectomy.
    Nisar, Taha
    Patel, Jimmy
    Memon, Muhammad Z.
    Singla, Amit
    Khandelwal, Priyank
    STROKE, 2021, 52
  • [9] Comparison Of Transradial Artery Versus Transfemoral Artery Access Mechanical Thrombectomy At A Comprehensive Stroke Center
    Nisar, Taha
    Patel, Jimmy
    Singla, Amit
    Khandelwal, Priyank
    STROKE, 2022, 53
  • [10] Transradial access versus transfemoral access: a comparison of outcomes and efficacy in reducing hemorrhagic events
    Cesaro, Arturo
    Moscarella, Elisabetta
    Gragnano, Felice
    Perrotta, Rocco
    Diana, Vincenzo
    Pariggiano, Ivana
    Concilio, Claudia
    Alfieri, Alfonso
    Cesaro, Francesco
    Mercone, Giuseppe
    Falato, Sergio
    Esposito, Augusto
    Di Girolamo, Domenico
    Limongelli, Giuseppe
    Calabro, Paolo
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2019, 17 (06) : 435 - 447