Comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption and carbon emissions of asphalt pavement recycling technology

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Decai [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Lan [1 ]
Zhang, Qunlei [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanxun [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Lei [2 ]
Cheng, Kai [1 ]
Wei, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Civil Engn & Commun, Zhengzhou 450045, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Yellow River Lab, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
关键词
Recycling technology; Energy consumption; Carbon emissions; Quantitative evaluation; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02987
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To assess the energy saving and emission reduction effects of recycling technology, the quantitative analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of recycled asphalt pavement is conducted of asphalt mixture production, transportation, paving and compaction. Firstly, the calculation model for energy consumption and carbon emissions of recycled asphalt pavement is established during the construction stage. In addition, the energy consumption and carbon emission of four recycling technologies, including the HCPR, HIR, CCPR and CIR, were compared. Finally, the FCE method is used to evaluate the actual effect of energy saving and emission reduction from the perspectives of the ecological benefit and the economic benefit. The research results indicate the most serious stage of energy consumption is the new material production stage, and the most serious stage of carbon emission is the asphalt mixture production stage of recycled asphalt pavement. Taking the HCPR technology as an example are calculated in detail. The energy consumption of the HCPR technology in the four stages of the construction stage was 17.59 MJ, 344.45 MJ, 228.51 MJ and 25.85 MJ, respectively, and the emissions in the four stages of the construction stage were 1307.89 g, 5971.28 g, 19,251.24 g and 1949.82 g, respectively. For different recycling technologies in the construction stage, the energy-saving ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 13.62%, 9.61% and 19.24% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, which have a certain energy-saving effect. However, the energy consumption of CIR reduced by 43.63%, which the energy saving effect is most significant. Moreover, the emission reduction ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 2.3%, 9.23% and 1.01% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, the emission of CIR reduced by 30.76%, so the emission reduction effect of CIR is most significant. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation score of the CIR technology with the most significant energy saving and emission reduction effect is 0.8021 in terms of ' ecological benefits ' and 0.8074 in terms of ' economic benefits '. In summary, it is recommended to adopt CIR technology in the engineering project, which can achieve the most significant energy-saving and emission reduction effects.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comprehensive evaluation and data analysis of field pavement distress for epoxy asphalt pavement on steel bridge deck
    Zhang, Zhu
    Ni, Fujian
    Jiang, Jiwang
    Huang, Jiaqi
    Han, Yajin
    Yu, Shuheng
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2023, 409
  • [42] Compaction Quality Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Based on Intelligent Compaction Technology
    Chen, Bei
    Yu, Xin
    Dong, Fuqiang
    Zheng, Changjiang
    Ding, Gongying
    Wu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (09)
  • [43] Evaluation of Microwave Heating for Potential Applications in Hot In-Place Recycling of Asphalt Pavement
    Chen, Xiao
    Wang, Hao
    Jiang, Baiyu
    Venkiteela, Giri
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (09) : 256 - 268
  • [44] Application and evaluation of asphalt mixture by central plant hot recycling in pavement structure with LSPM
    Xue, Yan-Qing
    Huang, Xiao-Ming
    Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 2011, 38 (10): : 26 - 33
  • [45] Asphalt Pavement Surface Penetrate Rejuvenate Restore Technology: Application and Evaluation
    Guo Xiaohong
    Liu Bangyin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION & RISK MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 1238 - 1243
  • [46] Evaluation of foamed asphalt cold in-place pavement recycling using nondestructive techniques
    Loizos, A.
    Papavasiliou, V.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (12) : 970 - 978
  • [47] Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Binder Extraction and Recovery Evaluation and Their Effects on the Recycling Agent Assessment
    Pinheiro, Gustavo
    Vasconcelos, Kamilla
    Bernucci, Liedi
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (11) : 707 - 721
  • [48] Investigation of Foamed Bitumen Mixes Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Materials for Cold Recycling Technology
    Mugume, Rodgers Bangi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 15 (01) : 98 - 110
  • [49] The United States Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Comprehensive Forecast Using a Regression Model
    Keerthana, Krishnamurthy Baskar
    Wu, Shih-Wei
    Wu, Mu-En
    Kokulnathan, Thangavelu
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [50] Investigation of Foamed Bitumen Mixes Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Materials for Cold Recycling Technology
    Rodgers Bangi Mugume
    International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2022, 15 : 98 - 110