Comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption and carbon emissions of asphalt pavement recycling technology

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Decai [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Lan [1 ]
Zhang, Qunlei [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanxun [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Lei [2 ]
Cheng, Kai [1 ]
Wei, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Civil Engn & Commun, Zhengzhou 450045, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Yellow River Lab, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
关键词
Recycling technology; Energy consumption; Carbon emissions; Quantitative evaluation; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02987
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To assess the energy saving and emission reduction effects of recycling technology, the quantitative analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of recycled asphalt pavement is conducted of asphalt mixture production, transportation, paving and compaction. Firstly, the calculation model for energy consumption and carbon emissions of recycled asphalt pavement is established during the construction stage. In addition, the energy consumption and carbon emission of four recycling technologies, including the HCPR, HIR, CCPR and CIR, were compared. Finally, the FCE method is used to evaluate the actual effect of energy saving and emission reduction from the perspectives of the ecological benefit and the economic benefit. The research results indicate the most serious stage of energy consumption is the new material production stage, and the most serious stage of carbon emission is the asphalt mixture production stage of recycled asphalt pavement. Taking the HCPR technology as an example are calculated in detail. The energy consumption of the HCPR technology in the four stages of the construction stage was 17.59 MJ, 344.45 MJ, 228.51 MJ and 25.85 MJ, respectively, and the emissions in the four stages of the construction stage were 1307.89 g, 5971.28 g, 19,251.24 g and 1949.82 g, respectively. For different recycling technologies in the construction stage, the energy-saving ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 13.62%, 9.61% and 19.24% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, which have a certain energy-saving effect. However, the energy consumption of CIR reduced by 43.63%, which the energy saving effect is most significant. Moreover, the emission reduction ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 2.3%, 9.23% and 1.01% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, the emission of CIR reduced by 30.76%, so the emission reduction effect of CIR is most significant. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation score of the CIR technology with the most significant energy saving and emission reduction effect is 0.8021 in terms of ' ecological benefits ' and 0.8074 in terms of ' economic benefits '. In summary, it is recommended to adopt CIR technology in the engineering project, which can achieve the most significant energy-saving and emission reduction effects.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Emissions of Asphalt Pavement Incorporating Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag by Comparative Study
    Xie, Jun
    Wang, Zhihu
    Wang, Fusong
    Wu, Shaopeng
    Chen, Zongwu
    Yang, Chao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [22] Study on the Recycling Method for Drainage Asphalt pavement and Evaluation for its Durability
    Kawakami, Atsushi
    Kubo, Kazuyuki
    Sasaki, Lwao
    Kano, Takashi
    INNOVATION AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY IN ROAD AND AIRFIELD PAVEMENT, 2013, 723 : 664 - +
  • [23] Utilization of Cold In-site Recycling Technology on Distressed Asphalt Concrete Pavement
    Liu, Yingran
    Xie, Chengwei
    Liang, Lulu
    Li, Xiaojun
    NEW MATERIALS AND PROCESSES, PTS 1-3, 2012, 476-478 : 1631 - 1634
  • [24] Greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption in asphalt plants
    dos Santos, Maicon Basso
    Candido, Jefferson
    Baule, Sofia de Souza
    Muller de Oliveira, Yuri Melo
    Thives, Liseane Padilha
    REVISTA ELETRONICA EM GESTAO EDUCACAO E TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTAL, 2020, 24
  • [25] The Evaluation of Hot In-place Recycling Technology in Asphalt Pavement's Pre-maintenance of Chongqing Expressway
    Mo, Liwei
    Guo, Xiaohong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE (CRIOCM2011), 2011, : 23 - 27
  • [26] Contribution of climate change and traffic load on asphalt pavement carbon emissions
    Liu, Tiancheng
    Yang, Shu
    Liao, Bo
    Yang, Enshuo
    Jiang, Xia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [27] A comprehensive review on asphalt fume suppression and energy saving technologies in asphalt pavement industry
    Sun, Guoqiang
    Ning, Weidong
    Jiang, Xulai
    Qiu, Kexin
    Cao, Zhilong
    Ding, Yongjie
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 913
  • [28] THE MODELLING OF EMISSIONS EVALUATION AT ASPHALT MIXING PLANT IN HOT RECYCLING
    Martisius, Mindaugas
    Sivilevicius, Henrikas
    TRANSPORT, 2022, 37 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [29] Towards carbon neutrality: a comprehensive review of sustainable materials for asphalt pavement
    Wu, Shenghua
    Bhatt, Basant
    Kenney, Cody
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2024,
  • [30] Energy harvesting from asphalt pavement using thermoelectric technology
    Jiang, Wei
    Yuan, Dongdong
    Xu, Shudong
    Hu, Huitao
    Xiao, Jingjing
    Sha, Aimin
    Huang, Yue
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 205 : 941 - 950