Comprehensive evaluation of energy consumption and carbon emissions of asphalt pavement recycling technology

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Decai [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Lan [1 ]
Zhang, Qunlei [1 ]
Zheng, Yuanxun [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Lei [2 ]
Cheng, Kai [1 ]
Wei, Jiawei [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Civil Engn & Commun, Zhengzhou 450045, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Water Conservancy Engn, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ, Yellow River Lab, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
关键词
Recycling technology; Energy consumption; Carbon emissions; Quantitative evaluation; Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02987
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
To assess the energy saving and emission reduction effects of recycling technology, the quantitative analysis of energy consumption and carbon emission of recycled asphalt pavement is conducted of asphalt mixture production, transportation, paving and compaction. Firstly, the calculation model for energy consumption and carbon emissions of recycled asphalt pavement is established during the construction stage. In addition, the energy consumption and carbon emission of four recycling technologies, including the HCPR, HIR, CCPR and CIR, were compared. Finally, the FCE method is used to evaluate the actual effect of energy saving and emission reduction from the perspectives of the ecological benefit and the economic benefit. The research results indicate the most serious stage of energy consumption is the new material production stage, and the most serious stage of carbon emission is the asphalt mixture production stage of recycled asphalt pavement. Taking the HCPR technology as an example are calculated in detail. The energy consumption of the HCPR technology in the four stages of the construction stage was 17.59 MJ, 344.45 MJ, 228.51 MJ and 25.85 MJ, respectively, and the emissions in the four stages of the construction stage were 1307.89 g, 5971.28 g, 19,251.24 g and 1949.82 g, respectively. For different recycling technologies in the construction stage, the energy-saving ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 13.62%, 9.61% and 19.24% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, which have a certain energy-saving effect. However, the energy consumption of CIR reduced by 43.63%, which the energy saving effect is most significant. Moreover, the emission reduction ratios of HCPR, HIR and CCPR are 2.3%, 9.23% and 1.01% respectively when compared with the typical scheme, the emission of CIR reduced by 30.76%, so the emission reduction effect of CIR is most significant. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation score of the CIR technology with the most significant energy saving and emission reduction effect is 0.8021 in terms of ' ecological benefits ' and 0.8074 in terms of ' economic benefits '. In summary, it is recommended to adopt CIR technology in the engineering project, which can achieve the most significant energy-saving and emission reduction effects.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recycling technology of aged asphalt pavement
    Wei, Qin
    Yang, Chang-Hui
    Xiong, Chu-Hua
    Ling, Tian-Qing
    Chongqing Jianzhu Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 2007, 29 (03): : 128 - 131
  • [2] Energy consumption and carbon emissions of mixing plant in asphalt pavement construction with a case study in China and reduction measures
    Liu, Yixuan
    Yang, Jun
    Wang, Houzhi
    Liu, Shinan
    Fan, Yulou
    Zhou, Yixin
    Gong, Minghui
    Huang, Wei
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2025, 22
  • [3] Research on Key Influencing Factors of Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Asphalt Pavement Based on Generalized Life Cycle
    Wang, Jiani
    He, Haonan
    Yu, Haichen
    Xue, Zhongjun
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROAD AND AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY 2023, 2023, : 351 - 366
  • [4] Methods for Reducing Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission in Asphalt Pavement Construction
    Ding, Zhiyong
    Yang, Yixiao
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, PTS 1-3, 2013, 361-363 : 1825 - 1828
  • [5] Evaluation of recycling asphalt pavement hot mix
    Moussa, Comma K.M.
    El-Hamrawy, Saad
    AEJ - Alexandria Engineering Journal, 1997, 36 (06):
  • [6] A literature review on cold recycling technology of asphalt pavement
    Xiao, Feipeng
    Yao, Shenglei
    Wang, Jingang
    Li, Xinghai
    Amirkhanian, Serji
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 180 : 579 - 604
  • [7] Evaluation of Gas Emissions, Energy Consumption and Production Costs of Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Involving Natural Zeolite and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP)
    Calabi-Floody, Alejandra T.
    Valdes-Vidal, Gonzalo A.
    Sanchez-Alonso, Elsa
    Mardones-Parra, Luis A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
  • [8] Research on Direct Energy Consumption and Carbon Emission of Asphalt Pavement Maintenance Engineering
    Yi, Mingwei
    Xiao, Yue
    Lin, Xiang
    Li, Qiang
    Yi, Xiaoming
    Cailiao Daobao/Materials Reports, 2024, 38 (20):
  • [9] Energy consumption model and energy-saving technology of asphalt pavement in paving and rolling construction
    Liu N.
    Wang Y.
    Liu H.
    Wang Z.
    Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2023, 55 (07): : 80 - 86
  • [10] Analysis of Carbon Emissions of Asphalt Pavement with Bottom Ash
    Cheng, Hao
    Li, Danni
    Mu, Yuanhong
    Zhou, Yingshi
    Li, Xingjiu
    Xue, Qiang
    Ding, Yongjie
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROAD AND AIRFIELD PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGY 2023, 2023, : 218 - 228