Deep learning for GNSS zenith tropospheric delay forecasting based on the informer model using 11-year ERA5 reanalysis data

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Fangxin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sha, Zhimin [2 ]
Wei, Pengzhi [2 ,3 ]
Xia, Pengfei [2 ]
Ye, Shirong [2 ,4 ]
Zhu, Yixin [2 ]
Luo, Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, GNSS Res Ctr, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Inst Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Qingchuan Univ, Sch Elect Informat, Wuhan 430204, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Satellite Network Syst Co Ltd, Chongqing 401122, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Zenith tropospheric delay; Deep-learning; Informer; ERA5; Precise point positioning; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/s10291-024-01720-9
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) is one of the main atmospheric errors in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). In this study, we propose a novel ZTD forecasting model based on the deep-learning method named Informer-based ZTD (IBZTD) forecasting model using the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fifth generation reanalysis data (ERA5) from 2011 to 2021. With 72-hour historical GNSS-derived ZTDs as prior information, the subsequent 24-hour ZTDs can be forecasted. The IBZTD forecasting model achieves the best regression fit with post GNSS-derived ZTDs compared with GPT3 (Global Pressure and Temperature 3) and HGPT2 (Hourly Global Pressure and Temperature 2) models, especially in winter with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.51 cm and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.15 cm. With the post GNSS-derived ZTDs as reference, in terms of the overall 24-hour forecasting accuracy for 9 GNSS stations in 2022, IBZTD forecasting model achieves a MAE of 1.66 cm and a RMSE of 2.21 cm, significantly outperforming the GPT3 model (MAE: 2.60 cm, RMSE: 3.37 cm), HGPT2 model (MAE: 3.23 cm, RMSE: 4.03 cm) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model (MAE: 2.65 cm, RMSE: 3.65 cm). An average time improvement of 17.8% and comparable forecasting precisions are achieved in the IBZTD forecasting model compared with the Transformer-based ZTD (TBZTD) forecasting model. Using predicted ZTD as prior constraints in Precise Point Positioning (PPP), the vertical convergence speed exhibits a significant improvement of 14.20%, 20.24%, 18.48%, and 19.39% in four seasons.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Short-Term Traffic Speed Forecasting Model for a Parallel Multi-Lane Arterial Road Using GPS-Monitored Data Based on Deep Learning Approach
    Quang Hoc Tran
    Fang, Yao-Min
    Chou, Tien-Yin
    Thanh-Van Hoang
    Wang, Chun-Tse
    Van Truong Vu
    Thi Lan Huong Ho
    Le, Quang
    Chen, Mei-Hsin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [42] Predicting Channel Delay State Information in 5G-TSN Systems Using Extreme Learning Machine Autoencoder (ELM-AE) Model Based on Intelligent Deep Extreme Learning Machine (DELM)
    Zhang, Chaoyi
    Wang, Jianquan
    Fu, Meixia
    IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2024, 11 (24): : 39375 - 39394
  • [43] An XGBoost Machine Learning Based Model for Predicting Ki-67 Value ≥ 15% in T2NXM0 Stage Primary Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Clinical Data and Delta-Radiomic Features on Ultrasound Images and Overall Survival Analysis: A 5-Year Postoperative Follow-Up Study
    Lu, Yang
    Yang, Fei
    Tao, Yichao
    An, Pang
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23