Deep learning for GNSS zenith tropospheric delay forecasting based on the informer model using 11-year ERA5 reanalysis data

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Fangxin [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Sha, Zhimin [2 ]
Wei, Pengzhi [2 ,3 ]
Xia, Pengfei [2 ]
Ye, Shirong [2 ,4 ]
Zhu, Yixin [2 ]
Luo, Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, GNSS Res Ctr, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Inst Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Qingchuan Univ, Sch Elect Informat, Wuhan 430204, Peoples R China
[5] Chongqing Satellite Network Syst Co Ltd, Chongqing 401122, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Zenith tropospheric delay; Deep-learning; Informer; ERA5; Precise point positioning; CHINA;
D O I
10.1007/s10291-024-01720-9
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Zenith Tropospheric Delay (ZTD) is one of the main atmospheric errors in the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). In this study, we propose a novel ZTD forecasting model based on the deep-learning method named Informer-based ZTD (IBZTD) forecasting model using the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fifth generation reanalysis data (ERA5) from 2011 to 2021. With 72-hour historical GNSS-derived ZTDs as prior information, the subsequent 24-hour ZTDs can be forecasted. The IBZTD forecasting model achieves the best regression fit with post GNSS-derived ZTDs compared with GPT3 (Global Pressure and Temperature 3) and HGPT2 (Hourly Global Pressure and Temperature 2) models, especially in winter with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 1.51 cm and a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 1.15 cm. With the post GNSS-derived ZTDs as reference, in terms of the overall 24-hour forecasting accuracy for 9 GNSS stations in 2022, IBZTD forecasting model achieves a MAE of 1.66 cm and a RMSE of 2.21 cm, significantly outperforming the GPT3 model (MAE: 2.60 cm, RMSE: 3.37 cm), HGPT2 model (MAE: 3.23 cm, RMSE: 4.03 cm) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model (MAE: 2.65 cm, RMSE: 3.65 cm). An average time improvement of 17.8% and comparable forecasting precisions are achieved in the IBZTD forecasting model compared with the Transformer-based ZTD (TBZTD) forecasting model. Using predicted ZTD as prior constraints in Precise Point Positioning (PPP), the vertical convergence speed exhibits a significant improvement of 14.20%, 20.24%, 18.48%, and 19.39% in four seasons.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [31] Analysis of diurnal to seasonal variability of Integrated Water Vapour in the South Indian Ocean basin using ground-based GNSS and fifth-generation ECMWF reanalysis (ERA5) data
    Lees, Edouard
    Bousquet, Olivier
    Roy, Denis
    de Bellevue, Jimmy Leclair
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 147 (734) : 229 - 248
  • [32] Modeling of Optimal Deep Learning Based Flood Forecasting Model Using Twitter Data
    Indra, G.
    Duraipandian, N.
    INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 35 (02): : 1455 - 1470
  • [33] Probabilistic spatiotemporal seasonal sea ice presence forecasting using sequence-to-sequence learning and ERA5 data in the Hudson Bay region
    Asadi, Nazanin
    Lamontagne, Philippe
    King, Matthew
    Richard, Martin
    Scott, K. Andrea
    CRYOSPHERE, 2022, 16 (09): : 3753 - 3773
  • [34] Evaluation of the Spatial and Temporal Variations of Condensation and Desublimation over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on Penman Model Using Hourly ERA5-Land and ERA5 Reanalysis Datasets
    Li, Hongyuan
    Chen, Rensheng
    Han, Chuntan
    Yang, Yong
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [35] Stratospheric ozone variation induced by the 11-year solar cycle: Recent 22-year simulation using 3-D chemical transport model with reanalysis data
    Sekiyama, Tsuyoshi T.
    Shibata, Kiyotaka
    Deushi, Makoto
    Kodera, Kunihiko
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (17)
  • [36] Towards physics-inspired data-driven weather forecasting: integrating data assimilation with a deep spatial-transformer-based U-NET in a case study with ERA5
    Chattopadhyay, Ashesh
    Mustafa, Mustafa
    Hassanzadeh, Pedram
    Bach, Eviatar
    Kashinath, Karthik
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 15 (05) : 2221 - 2237
  • [37] Online Model-based Functional Clustering and Functional Deep Learning for Load Forecasting Using Smart Meter Data
    Dai, Shuang
    Meng, Fanlin
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, SEST, 2022,
  • [38] The impact of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) zenith total delay data assimilation on the short-term precipitable water vapor and precipitation forecast over Italy using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model
    Torcasio, Rosa Claudia
    Mascitelli, Alessandra
    Realini, Eugenio
    Barindelli, Stefano
    Tagliaferro, Giulio
    Puca, Silvia
    Dietrich, Stefano
    Federico, Stefano
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2023, 23 (11) : 3319 - 3336
  • [39] Multi-Feature Data Fusion-Based Load Forecasting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Using a Deep Learning Model
    Aduama, Prince
    Zhang, Zhibo
    Al-Sumaiti, Ameena S.
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [40] Remotely sensed retrieval of air-sea carbon flux and acidification risk in Chinese Bohai Sea based on a semi-analytical mechanism model with hour-level GOCI image and ERA5 reanalysis data
    Yu, Xiang
    Liu, Yan
    Bi, Jialin
    Cai, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Liping
    Nie, Liangkun
    Qiao, Chao
    Li, Guanghao
    Zhan, Chao
    Li, Guoqing
    Liu, Xianbin
    Wang, Xiaohui
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 445