Working with the tensions of transdisciplinary research: a review and agenda for the future of knowledge co-production in the Anthropocene

被引:2
|
作者
Harris, Frances [1 ]
Lyon, Fergus [2 ]
Sioen, Giles B. [3 ,4 ]
Ebi, Krsitie L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hertfordshire, Geog Environm & Planning & Sch Educ, Hatfield, England
[2] Middlesex Univ, Ctr Enterprise Environm & Dev Res, London, England
[3] Future Earth Global Secretariat, Tsukuba, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Earth Syst Div, Tsukuba, Japan
[5] Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm CHanGE, Seattle, WA USA
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
collaboration; institutional logics; sustainability science; transdisciplinarity; SUSTAINABILITY RESEARCH; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; NATURAL-RESOURCE; COMPLEX-SYSTEMS; SCIENCE; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; POLICY; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2024.11
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summary Transdisciplinary approaches for sustainability brings natural and social science researchers together with non researchers to fill gaps in scientific knowledge and catalyze change. By connecting diverse academic fields and sectors, it addresses complex problems and enables learning for problem solving. However, institutional barriers, funding constraints, time limitations, and evaluation criteria hinder collaborative progress. Our review reveals tensions at institutional and individual levels. Our findings underscore the significance of soft skills in assembling effective transdisciplinary teams. Embracing transdisciplinary science, as suggested by our review, can enhance problem-solving, and foster transformations for sustainability and resilience.Technical summary Sustainability challenges in the age of the Anthropocene require researchers and practitioners to collaborate across multiple academic disciplines and multiple professions outside of universities. In this paper we draw on theories of institutional logics to explore how those involved in transdisciplinary environmental research and practice draw on particular sets of values and norms but encounter challenges to collaboration. These institutional logics include (among others) seeking societal/environmental impact, commercial objectives, and academic knowledge generation. In this paper we review the growing literature on the research experience of transdisciplinarity in sustainability; discuss the processes of managing such research; and present a framework that outlines the challenges and tensions at each stage of the innovation/research process. We set out an agenda for managing tension that calls for recognizing the challenges, learning how to work with tensions, and building capabilities for future careers involving transdisciplinary research. The paper shows a key competence or skill for transdisciplinarians is the ability to develop complex collaborative relationships for sustainability drawing together different institutional logics, approaches, methods, goals, and values.Social media summary Transdisciplinary science: bridging disciplines, solving challenges. Soft skills and collaboration key to success.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda
    Bram Verschuere
    Taco Brandsen
    Victor Pestoff
    [J]. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2012, 23 : 1083 - 1101
  • [2] Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda
    Verschuere, Bram
    Brandsen, Taco
    Pestoff, Victor
    [J]. VOLUNTAS, 2012, 23 (04): : 1083 - 1101
  • [3] Biodynamic farming research and transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: Exploring the synergies
    Rigolot, Cyrille
    [J]. GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2023, 32 (04): : 353 - 358
  • [4] Facilitating Co-Production of Transdisciplinary Knowledge for Sustainability: Working with Canadian Biosphere Reserve Practitioners
    Reed, Maureen G.
    Abernethy, Paivi
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2018, 31 (01) : 39 - 56
  • [5] Co-production of knowledge: the future
    Redman, S.
    Greenhalgh, T.
    Adedokun, L.
    Staniszewska, S.
    Denegri, S.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [6] Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland
    Aeberhard, Andrea
    Rist, Stephan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (04) : 1171 - 1181
  • [7] Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving
    Polk, Merritt
    [J]. FUTURES, 2015, 65 : 110 - 122
  • [8] Knowledge co-production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects
    Vinke-de Kruijf, Joanne
    Verbrugge, Laura
    Schroeter, Barbara
    den Haan, Robert-Jan
    Arevalo, Juliette Cortes
    Fliervoet, Jan
    Henze, Jennifer
    Albert, Christian
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 30 (02) : 393 - 405
  • [9] Knowledge Integration and Co-Production in Transdisciplinary Research Outline of a linguistic Research Field on the communicative Genesis of transformative Knowledge for sustainable Development
    Metten, Thomas
    [J]. DEUTSCHE SPRACHE, 2021, 49 (04): : 307 - 320
  • [10] Co-production of a research and advocacy agenda for Inclusion Health
    Luchenski, Serena
    Edge, Chantal
    Hutchinson-Pascal, Niccola
    Sultan, Binta
    Black, Georgia
    Burridge, Stan
    Johnson, Luke
    Palipane, Natasha
    Rosenthal, Diana Margot
    Fairhead, Cassandra
    King, Emma
    Lewer, Dan
    Dibley, Velvet
    Khan, Zana
    Collinson, Lucie
    Pathak, Neha
    Story, Alistair
    Hayward, Andrew
    [J]. LANCET, 2019, 394 : 68 - 68