Does Digital Agricultural Technology Extension Service Enhance Sustainable Food Production? Evidence from Maize Farmers in China

被引:3
|
作者
Lun, Runqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [4 ]
Li, Guojing [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Qiyou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Agr Prod & Resource Econ, D-85354 Munich, Germany
[4] China Mobile Grp Design Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
digital agricultural technology extension service; sustainable food production; eco-efficiency of maize production; endogenous switching regression; potential mechanism; REGIONAL ECO-EFFICIENCY; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERSPECTIVE; ADOPTION; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; FOOTPRINT; SECURITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14020292
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This research aims to investigate the average and heterogeneous impacts of digital agricultural technology extension service use on eco-efficiency among 1302 maize-producing farmers from a major maize-producing area in Northeast China in 2022. The slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs is applied to calculate the eco-efficiency of maize production. To obtain an unbiased estimation of the average effect, the self-selection problem generated by observable and unobservable factors is solved by the endogenous switching regression model. Quantile regression is utilized to analyze the heterogeneous effect. Notably, the mediated effects model is utilized to examine the potential mechanism between them. Our findings indicate that digital agricultural technology extension service use can increase maize production's eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service users would have reduced the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.148 (21.11%) if they had not used it. Digital agricultural technology extension service nonusers would have improved the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.214 (35.20%) if they had used it. The robustness check reconfirms the results. Moreover, digital agricultural technology extension service use is more helpful for maize farmers who have lower eco-efficiency than those who have higher eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service use can improve the eco-efficiency of maize production through the application of organic fertilizers, green pesticides, and biodegradable agricultural films. There are policy implications of these findings: there is an argument for using the publicity of the digital agricultural technology extension service to encourage farmers to use sustainable inputs; additionally, it might be worthwhile to implement a categorized promotion strategy based on the different real-world situations.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Agricultural Insurance on Farmers' Enthusiasm for Sugarcane Production: Evidence from Guangxi, China
    Zhu, Ming
    Yang, Ruihua
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [42] Leveraging digital infrastructure for sustainable grain production: evidence from China
    Han, Jiabin
    Ge, Wenting
    Chou, Yixiu
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8
  • [43] When Does Digital Technology Adoption Enhance Firms’ Sustainable Innovation Performance? A Configurational Analysis in China
    Cheng, Cong
    Zhang, Mengxin
    Dai, Jian
    Yang, Ze
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 1555 - 1568
  • [44] Does Farm Size Expansion Improve the Agricultural Environment? Evidence from Apple Farmers in China
    Cheng, Juanjuan
    Wang, Qian
    Zhang, Huanmin
    Matsubara, Toyohiko
    Yoshikawa, Naoki
    Yu, Jin
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [45] Does Agricultural Science and Technological Innovation Always Boost Farmers' Income? Evidence from China
    Xiang, Yi
    Ding, Yuke
    Yin, Shaohua
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [46] Does ICT-based agriculture extension service use promote litchi farmers' involvement in diversification? Evidence from Southern China
    Cai, Yi
    Qi, Wene
    Yi, Famin
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2023, 14
  • [47] Does Land Transfer Enhance the Sustainable Livelihood of Rural Households? Evidence from China
    Yang, Hui
    Huang, Zeng
    Fu, Zhuoying
    Dai, Jiayou
    Yang, Yan
    Wang, Wei
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [48] Time Preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: Field evidence from rice farmers in China
    Mao, Hui
    Zhou, Li
    Ying, RuiYao
    Pan, Dan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 109
  • [49] The Impact of Digital Finance on Farmers' Adoption of Eco-Agricultural Technology: Evidence from Rice-Crayfish Co-Cultivation Technology in China
    Liu, Zhe
    Qi, Zhenhong
    Tian, Qingsong
    Clark, John Stephen
    Zhang, Zeyu
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [50] Does agricultural factor misallocation hinder agricultural green production efficiency? Evidence from China
    Lei, Shaohai
    Yang, Xiao
    Qin, Jiahong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 891