Does Digital Agricultural Technology Extension Service Enhance Sustainable Food Production? Evidence from Maize Farmers in China

被引:3
|
作者
Lun, Runqi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wei [4 ]
Li, Guojing [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Qiyou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Resources & Reg Planning, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] State Key Lab Efficient Utilizat Arid & Semiarid A, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Agr Prod & Resource Econ, D-85354 Munich, Germany
[4] China Mobile Grp Design Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
digital agricultural technology extension service; sustainable food production; eco-efficiency of maize production; endogenous switching regression; potential mechanism; REGIONAL ECO-EFFICIENCY; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERSPECTIVE; ADOPTION; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; FOOTPRINT; SECURITY;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14020292
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This research aims to investigate the average and heterogeneous impacts of digital agricultural technology extension service use on eco-efficiency among 1302 maize-producing farmers from a major maize-producing area in Northeast China in 2022. The slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs is applied to calculate the eco-efficiency of maize production. To obtain an unbiased estimation of the average effect, the self-selection problem generated by observable and unobservable factors is solved by the endogenous switching regression model. Quantile regression is utilized to analyze the heterogeneous effect. Notably, the mediated effects model is utilized to examine the potential mechanism between them. Our findings indicate that digital agricultural technology extension service use can increase maize production's eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service users would have reduced the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.148 (21.11%) if they had not used it. Digital agricultural technology extension service nonusers would have improved the eco-efficiency of the service by 0.214 (35.20%) if they had used it. The robustness check reconfirms the results. Moreover, digital agricultural technology extension service use is more helpful for maize farmers who have lower eco-efficiency than those who have higher eco-efficiency. Digital agricultural technology extension service use can improve the eco-efficiency of maize production through the application of organic fertilizers, green pesticides, and biodegradable agricultural films. There are policy implications of these findings: there is an argument for using the publicity of the digital agricultural technology extension service to encourage farmers to use sustainable inputs; additionally, it might be worthwhile to implement a categorized promotion strategy based on the different real-world situations.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Digital Finance Increase Relatively Large-Scale Farmers' Agricultural Income through the Allocation of Production Factors? Evidence from China
    Song, Kun
    Tang, Yu
    Zang, Dungang
    Guo, Hua
    Kong, Wenting
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [22] The impact of digital finance use on sustainable agricultural practices adoption among smallholder farmers: an evidence from rural China
    Zhao, Peipei
    Zhang, Wei
    Cai, Wencong
    Liu, Tianjun
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (26) : 39281 - 39294
  • [23] The impact of digital finance use on sustainable agricultural practices adoption among smallholder farmers: an evidence from rural China
    Peipei Zhao
    Wei Zhang
    Wencong Cai
    Tianjun Liu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 39281 - 39294
  • [24] How does internet use promote joint adoption of sustainable agricultural practices? Evidence from rice farmers in China
    Zhong, Wenjing
    Chen, Yitao
    Xie, Lin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [25] Does internet use improve eco-efficiency of agricultural production? Evidence from potato farmers in China
    Lun, Runqi
    Sauer, Johannes
    Gao, Mingjie
    Yang, Yadong
    Luo, Qiyou
    Li, Guojing
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 477
  • [26] Smallholder farmers' preferences for sustainable intensification attributes in maize production: Evidence from Ghana
    Kotu, Bekele Hundie
    Oyinbo, Oyakhilomen
    Hoeschle-Zeledon, Irmgard
    Nurudeen, Abdul Rahman
    Kizito, Fred
    Boyubie, Benedict
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 152
  • [27] Does food safety perception matter to farmers' happiness? evidence from China
    Zhu, Zhong-kun
    Leng, Chen-xin
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [28] Will land transfer improve grain farmers' adoption of agricultural green production technology? Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China
    Peng, Yuanyuan
    Guo, Jinyong
    Liu, Yanduo
    Liao, Lichen
    Jiang, Siwei
    Tang, Yonghong
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [29] Effect of farmland scale on agricultural green production technology adoption: Evidence from rice farmers in Jiangsu Province, China
    Xu, Dingde
    Liu, Yi
    Li, Yichao
    Liu, Shaoquan
    Liu, Guihua
    LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 147
  • [30] Effect of digital multimedia on the adoption of agricultural green production technology among farmers in Liaoning Province, China
    Yu, Xueying
    Sheng, Guojun
    Sun, Dongshi
    He, Rui
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):