Clinical comparative study of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones: a retrospective case-controlled study

被引:1
|
作者
Jing, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Fan [1 ]
Yuan, Xiaobin [1 ]
Zhang, Xuhui [1 ]
Cao, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Urol, 85 Jiefang South Rd, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Lower pole stone; Single-use flexible ureteroscopy; Reusable flexible ureteroscopy; Efficacy; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PELVICALICEAL ANATOMY; URETERORENOSCOPY; DURABILITY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01541-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones. Methods We enrolled 135 patients underwent reusable flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) and 78 patients underwent single-use digital FURS. Demographic, clinical variables, anatomical parameters of the lower calyx and perioperative indicators were compared in the two groups. Results Thirty-six patients in the infundibuloureter angle (IPA) < 45 degrees subgroup had a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL), including 25 patients in the reusable FURS group and 11 patients in the single-use FURS group. The demographic and clinical variables in the two FURS groups were comparable. There was no statistical difference in the success rate of stone searching (P > 0.05). In terms of the success rate of lithotripsy, there was also no statistical difference in the IPA >= 45 degrees subgroup (P > 0.05), whereas single-use FURS was superior in the IPA < 45 degrees subgroup (chi 2 = 6.513, P = 0.011). The length of the working fiber in the reusable FURS and single-use FURS groups was 3.20 +/- 0.68 mm and 1.75 +/- 0.47 mm, respectively (t = 18.297, P < 0.05). The use of a stone basket in the reusable FURS (31/135, 23.0%) was significantly higher than that in the single-use FURS (8/78, 10.3%) (chi 2 = 5.336, P = 0.021). Compared with the reusable FURS group, the single-use FURS group had shorter operation times (P < 0.05) and higher stone-free rate (SFR) (chi 2 = 4.230, P = 0.040). There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative transfer of mini-PCNL and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Single-use and reusable FURS are alternative methods for removal of lower pole stones (i.e., 2 cm or less). Single-use FURS has a high success rate of lithotripsy, shorter operation time, and high stone-free rate.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Outcomes and Safety Assessment of Flexible Ureteroscopy as an Outpatient Procedure: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Mitroi, George F.
    Dragoescu, Petru Octavian
    Mitroi, Mihaela Roxana
    Mitroi, George G.
    Dudan, Iulia Bianca
    Popescu, Tudor Cristian Timotei
    Nedelcuta, Cristian Mihai
    Drocas, Andrei Ioan
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (09):
  • [42] Clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with lymph node metastasis: A retrospective single-centre case-controlled study
    Zhang, Xinhua
    Guo, Xiaodan
    Huang, Shaoqing
    Xia, Yanzhe
    Zhou, Xuefu
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [43] Relevance of Adopting a Hybrid Strategy Mixing Single-Use and Reusable Ureteroscopes for Stones Management: An Economic Study to Support the Best Strategy
    Monmousseau, Fanny
    Ramillon, Julien
    Dubnitskiy-Robin, Sophie
    Faivre d'Arcier, Benjamin
    Le Verger, Martine
    Le Fol, Tanguy
    Bruyere, Franck
    Rusch, Emmanuel
    Brunet-Houdard, Solene
    Pradere, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [44] Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times
    Panach-Navarrete, Jorge
    Lloret-Dura, Marcos Antonio
    Sanchez-Gimeno, Silvia
    Murcia-Diez, Esther
    Martinez-Jabaloyas, Jose Maria
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2023, 76 (01): : 65 - 69
  • [45] A comparative single-use clinical study of the efficacy of two manual toothbrushes with angled bristles
    Cronin, MJ
    Dembling, WZ
    Jacobs, DM
    Low, MAL
    Warren, PR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 14 (05): : 263 - 266
  • [46] A RANDOMIZED, COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDY OF NEW-GENERATION DIGITAL REUSABLE VS. SINGLE-USE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES FOR ENDOSCOPIC COMBINED INTRARENAL SURGERY
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Hamamoto, Shuzo
    Yanase, Takahiro
    Chaya, Ryosuke
    Kawase, Kengo
    Sugino, Teruaki
    Unno, Rei
    Takakura, Yohei
    Tajima, Shiori
    Okada, Atsushi
    Yasui, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E188 - E189
  • [47] Flexible ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of lower pole renal hard stones ≤ 2 cm: a prospective randomized study
    Zeinelabden, Khaled Magdy
    Abdelhalim, Elsayed
    Galal, Mohamed
    Abdelbaky, Tarek
    Nabeeh, Hossam
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [48] Anti-Depressant Use Does Not Predict Development of Microscopic Colitis: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Study
    Shenoy, Abhishek
    Redd, Walker D.
    Hunold, Thomas
    Hays, R. Ann
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S117 - S117
  • [49] Polydeoxyribonucleotide Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Case-Controlled, Retrospective, Comparative Study With 6-Month Follow-Up
    Yoon, Young Chun
    Lee, Doo-Hyung
    Lee, Michael Young
    Yoon, Seung-Hyun
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 98 (05): : 874 - 880
  • [50] Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study
    Salvado, Jose A.
    Cabello, Jose M.
    Moreno, Sergio
    Cabello, Renato
    Olivares, Ruben
    Velasco, Alfredo
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 72 (03) : 280 - 284