Clinical comparative study of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones: a retrospective case-controlled study

被引:1
|
作者
Jing, Qiang [1 ]
Liu, Fan [1 ]
Yuan, Xiaobin [1 ]
Zhang, Xuhui [1 ]
Cao, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Urol, 85 Jiefang South Rd, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, Peoples R China
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Lower pole stone; Single-use flexible ureteroscopy; Reusable flexible ureteroscopy; Efficacy; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; PELVICALICEAL ANATOMY; URETERORENOSCOPY; DURABILITY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01541-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of single-use and reusable digital flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of lower pole stones. Methods We enrolled 135 patients underwent reusable flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) and 78 patients underwent single-use digital FURS. Demographic, clinical variables, anatomical parameters of the lower calyx and perioperative indicators were compared in the two groups. Results Thirty-six patients in the infundibuloureter angle (IPA) < 45 degrees subgroup had a mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL), including 25 patients in the reusable FURS group and 11 patients in the single-use FURS group. The demographic and clinical variables in the two FURS groups were comparable. There was no statistical difference in the success rate of stone searching (P > 0.05). In terms of the success rate of lithotripsy, there was also no statistical difference in the IPA >= 45 degrees subgroup (P > 0.05), whereas single-use FURS was superior in the IPA < 45 degrees subgroup (chi 2 = 6.513, P = 0.011). The length of the working fiber in the reusable FURS and single-use FURS groups was 3.20 +/- 0.68 mm and 1.75 +/- 0.47 mm, respectively (t = 18.297, P < 0.05). The use of a stone basket in the reusable FURS (31/135, 23.0%) was significantly higher than that in the single-use FURS (8/78, 10.3%) (chi 2 = 5.336, P = 0.021). Compared with the reusable FURS group, the single-use FURS group had shorter operation times (P < 0.05) and higher stone-free rate (SFR) (chi 2 = 4.230, P = 0.040). There was no statistical difference in the intraoperative transfer of mini-PCNL and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions Single-use and reusable FURS are alternative methods for removal of lower pole stones (i.e., 2 cm or less). Single-use FURS has a high success rate of lithotripsy, shorter operation time, and high stone-free rate.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes
    Davis, Niall F.
    McGrath, Shannon
    Quinlan, Mark
    Jack, Gregory
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Bolton, Damien M.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (03) : 214 - 217
  • [2] RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY IN THE TREATMENT OF LOWER POLE STONES: IS A BETTER CLINICAL SCENARIO FOR USING SINGLE-USE FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPES? RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE CASE - CONTROL STUDY
    Salvado, Jose
    Sanchez, Rodrigo
    Cabello, Jose
    Cabello, Renato
    Moreno, Sergio
    Kompatzki, Alvaro
    Olivares, Ruben
    Velasco, Alfredo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E1153 - E1153
  • [3] Retrospective comparative study of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteral stones
    Galal, Ehab Mohamad
    Anwar, Ahmad Zaki
    El-Bab, Tarek Khalaf Fath
    Abdelhamid, Amr Mohamad
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (05): : 967 - 972
  • [4] Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5–2.5cm lower pole renal stones
    Wei Meng
    Huajun Zhang
    Jiahao Wang
    Bo Chen
    Zhaosheng Jiang
    Limin Ma
    Yangbo Guan
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2024, 56 : 55 - 62
  • [5] Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones
    Meng, Wei
    Zhang, Huajun
    Wang, Jiahao
    Chen, Bo
    Jiang, Zhaosheng
    Ma, Limin
    Guan, Yangbo
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 56 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [6] Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes as a Safe and Effective Choice for the Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized-Controlled Trial
    Yang, Enguang
    Jing, Suoshi
    Niu, Yuanjie
    Qi, Shiyong
    Yadav, Prabin Kumar
    Yang, Li
    Bao, Junsheng
    Tian, Junqiang
    Wang, Juan
    Li, Ningchen
    Ou, Tongwen
    Wang, Zhiping
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (12) : 1773 - 1778
  • [7] Single use and reusable flexible ureteroscopies for the treatment of urinary stones: A comparative study of perioperative complications
    Baboudjian, M.
    Gondran-Tellier, B.
    Abdallah, R.
    Tadrist, A.
    Sichez, P. C.
    Akiki, A.
    Gaillet, S.
    Delaporte, V
    Karsenty, G.
    Lechevallier, E.
    Boissier, R.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2021, 31 (06): : 368 - 373
  • [8] Single-use flexible bronchoscopes vs traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes: a prospective controlled study
    Shuzhen He
    Lihua Xie
    Jianming Liu
    Lijun Zou
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23
  • [9] Single-use flexible bronchoscopes vs traditional reusable flexible bronchoscopes: a prospective controlled study
    He, Shuzhen
    Xie, Lihua
    Liu, Jianming
    Zou, Lijun
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Comparison of reusable and single-use ureteroscopes for the treatment of medium-sized stones in the lower calyx: A prospective randomized study
    Salman, Mehmet Yilmaz
    Bayar, Goksel
    Dincer, Hakan Remzi
    Sinanoglu, Orhun
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 12 (07): : 770 - 774