Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality

被引:0
|
作者
Huebner, Gesche M. [1 ]
Fell, Michael J. [2 ]
Watson, Nicole E. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Energy Environm & Resources, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London, England
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
energy; open data and code; open science; preprints; preregistration; quality; reporting guidelines; reproducibility; research practices; transparency; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; DATA-COLLECTION; IMPACT; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; CODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy use is of crucial importance for the global challenge of climate change, and also is an essential part of daily life. Hence, research on energy needs to be robust and valid. Other scientific disciplines have experienced a reproducibility crisis, i.e. existing findings could not be reproduced in new studies. The 'TReQ' approach is recommended to improve research practices in the energy field and arrive at greater transparency, reproducibility and quality. A highly adaptable suite of tools is presented that can be applied to energy research approaches across this multidisciplinary and fast -changing field. In particular, the following tools are introduced - preregistration of studies, making data and code publicly available, using preprints, and employing reporting guidelines - to heighten the standard of research practices within the energy field. The wider adoption of these tools can facilitate greater trust in the findings of research used to inform evidence -based policy and practice in the energy field.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Building Transparency and Reproducibility into the Practice of Pharmacoepidemiology and Outcomes Research
    Pottegard, Anton
    Wang, Shirley V.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 33 : 538 - 539
  • [32] Palgrave Communications' commitment to promoting transparency and reproducibility in research
    D'Oca, Gino
    Hrynaszkiewicz, Iain
    PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 1
  • [33] Building transparency and reproducibility into the practice of pharmacoepidemiology and outcomes research
    Wang, Shirley, V
    Pottegard, Anton
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 193 (11) : 1625 - 1631
  • [34] Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement
    Stewart, Andrew J.
    Farran, Emily K.
    Grange, James A.
    Macleod, Malcolm
    Munafo, Marcus
    Newton, Phil
    Shanks, David R.
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [35] Explorations and Practices Combining Real Situations, Improving Graduate Students Teaching and Guidance Quality
    Xu Xiao-nan
    EDUCATION AND EDUCATION MANAGEMENT, 2011, 2 : 198 - 201
  • [36] The State of Reproducibility and Transparency Practices in Pathology: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
    Hughes, Griffin
    Vassar, Matt
    Siddiqui, Bilal
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2023, 103 (03) : S1715 - S1716
  • [37] Improving reproducibility in computational biology research
    Papin, Jason A.
    Mac Gabhann, Feilim
    Sauro, Herbert M.
    Nickerson, David
    Rampadarath, Anand
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 16 (05)
  • [38] Improving the computational reproducibility of immunological research
    Anderson, Brooke
    Lyons, Michael
    Henao-Tamayo, Marcela, I
    Juarrero, Mercedes Gonzalez
    Robertson, Gregory
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 204 (01):
  • [39] Improving rigor and reproducibility in cardiovascular research
    Lindsey, Merry L.
    Leblanc, Amanda J.
    Bertrand, Luc
    Bradshaw, Amy D.
    Kleinbongard, Petra
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 325 (04): : H866 - H868
  • [40] Improving Reproducibility of Psychiatric Neuroimaging Research
    Heckers, Stephan
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 79 (09) : 138S - 138S