Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality

被引:0
|
作者
Huebner, Gesche M. [1 ]
Fell, Michael J. [2 ]
Watson, Nicole E. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Energy Environm & Resources, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London, England
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
energy; open data and code; open science; preprints; preregistration; quality; reporting guidelines; reproducibility; research practices; transparency; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; DATA-COLLECTION; IMPACT; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; CODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy use is of crucial importance for the global challenge of climate change, and also is an essential part of daily life. Hence, research on energy needs to be robust and valid. Other scientific disciplines have experienced a reproducibility crisis, i.e. existing findings could not be reproduced in new studies. The 'TReQ' approach is recommended to improve research practices in the energy field and arrive at greater transparency, reproducibility and quality. A highly adaptable suite of tools is presented that can be applied to energy research approaches across this multidisciplinary and fast -changing field. In particular, the following tools are introduced - preregistration of studies, making data and code publicly available, using preprints, and employing reporting guidelines - to heighten the standard of research practices within the energy field. The wider adoption of these tools can facilitate greater trust in the findings of research used to inform evidence -based policy and practice in the energy field.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving reproducibility in animal research
    Florian Frommlet
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [22] Improving the reproducibility of metabolic research
    不详
    NATURE METABOLISM, 2022, 4 (09) : 1085 - 1085
  • [23] Improving the reproducibility of metabolic research
    Nature Metabolism, 2022, 4 : 1085 - 1085
  • [24] Improving reproducibility in animal research
    Frommlet, Florian
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [25] Improving reproducibility in spine research
    Dahia, Chitra L.
    Le Maitre, Christine L.
    JOR SPINE, 2020, 3 (03):
  • [26] Improving the Transparency and Robustness of Research
    Munafo, Marcus
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) : 397 - 397
  • [27] An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017)
    Hardwicke, Tom E.
    Wallach, Joshua D.
    Kidwell, Mallory C.
    Bendixen, Theiss
    Cruewell, Sophia
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2020, 7 (02):
  • [28] Investigation of research quality and transparency in neurosurgery through the utilization of open science practices
    Zahin Alam
    Kush Desai
    Anirudh Maddali
    Vijay Sivan
    Rohit Prem Kumar
    Geoffrey R. O’Malley
    Nitesh Patel
    Neurosurgical Review, 47 (1)
  • [29] Palgrave Communications’ commitment to promoting transparency and reproducibility in research
    Gino D’Oca
    Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
    Palgrave Communications, 1 (1)
  • [30] Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement
    Andrew J. Stewart
    Emily K. Farran
    James A. Grange
    Malcolm Macleod
    Marcus Munafò
    Phil Newton
    David R. Shanks
    BMC Research Notes, 14