Improving energy research practices: guidance for transparency, reproducibility and quality

被引:0
|
作者
Huebner, Gesche M. [1 ]
Fell, Michael J. [2 ]
Watson, Nicole E. [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Energy Environm & Resources, London, England
[2] UCL, UCL Energy Inst, London, England
来源
BUILDINGS & CITIES | 2021年 / 2卷 / 01期
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
energy; open data and code; open science; preprints; preregistration; quality; reporting guidelines; reproducibility; research practices; transparency; QUESTIONABLE RESEARCH PRACTICES; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; PUBLICATION BIAS; DATA-COLLECTION; IMPACT; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; CODE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy use is of crucial importance for the global challenge of climate change, and also is an essential part of daily life. Hence, research on energy needs to be robust and valid. Other scientific disciplines have experienced a reproducibility crisis, i.e. existing findings could not be reproduced in new studies. The 'TReQ' approach is recommended to improve research practices in the energy field and arrive at greater transparency, reproducibility and quality. A highly adaptable suite of tools is presented that can be applied to energy research approaches across this multidisciplinary and fast -changing field. In particular, the following tools are introduced - preregistration of studies, making data and code publicly available, using preprints, and employing reporting guidelines - to heighten the standard of research practices within the energy field. The wider adoption of these tools can facilitate greater trust in the findings of research used to inform evidence -based policy and practice in the energy field.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research
    Okonya, Ochije
    Rorah, Drayton
    Tritz, Daniel
    Umberham, Blake
    Wiley, Matt
    Vassar, Matt
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (05) : 835 - 842
  • [2] A Practical Guide for Improving Transparency and Reproducibility in Neuroimaging Research
    Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J.
    Poldrack, Russell A.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2016, 14 (07)
  • [3] Reporting of Medical Research Costs Improving Transparency and Reproducibility of Medical Research
    Visser, B. J.
    Buijink, A. W. G.
    Grobusch, M. P.
    METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2014, 53 (04) : 329 - 331
  • [4] An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology
    Johnson, Austin L.
    Torgerson, Trevor
    Skinner, Mason
    Hamilton, Tom
    Tritz, Daniel
    Vassar, Matt
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (08): : 1894 - 1901
  • [5] Transparency and reproducibility in evolutionary research
    Shaw, Ruth G.
    Moore, Allen J.
    Noor, Mohamed
    Ritchie, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2016, 29 (07) : 1296 - 1297
  • [6] Transparency and reproducibility in evolutionary research
    Shaw, Ruth G.
    Moore, Allen J.
    Noor, Mohamed
    Ritchie, Michael G.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2016, 6 (14): : 4605 - 4606
  • [7] Transparency and reproducibility in evolutionary research
    Shaw, Ruth G.
    Moore, Allen J.
    Noor, Mohamed
    Ritchie, Michael G.
    EVOLUTION, 2016, 70 (07) : 1433 - 1434
  • [8] Transparency and reproducibility research practices in articles from Spanish Library and Information Science journals
    Salvador-Olivan, Jose Antonio
    Marco-Cuenca, Gonzalo
    Arquero-Aviles, Rosario
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DOCUMENTACION CIENTIFICA, 2023, 46 (03):
  • [9] Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
    Christensen, Garret
    Miguel, Edward
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2018, 56 (03) : 920 - 980
  • [10] The Importance of Transparency to the Reproducibility of Translational Research
    Moore, Justin B.
    Campbell, Kristin L.
    Bartholomew, John B.
    TRANSLATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 5 (11)