Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas

被引:0
|
作者
Magoulick, Katherine M. [1 ]
Hull, Vanessa [2 ]
Liu, Jianguo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biomes; IUCN red list; Mammal populations; Remoteness; Terrestrial protected areas; PACIFIC ISLANDS; EXTINCTION RISK; HABITAT LOSS; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DEFORESTATION; WILDLIFE; BIASES; LAND; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-024-02014-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Protected areas are a key component of global conservation, and the world is aiming to increase protected areas to cover 30% of land and water through the 30 x 30 Initiative under the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. However, factors affecting their success or failure in regard to promoting mammal population recovery are not well studied, particularly using quantitative approaches comparing across diverse taxa, biomes, and countries. To better understand how protected areas contribute to mammalian recovery, we conducted an analysis of 2706 mammal populations both inside and outside of protected areas worldwide. We calculated the annual percent change of mammal populations within and outside of terrestrial protected areas and examined the relationship between the percent change and a suite of human and natural characteristics including biome, region, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) protected area category, IUCN Red List classification, and taxonomic order. Our results show that overall mammal populations inside and outside of protected areas are relatively stable. It appears that Threatened mammals are doing better inside of protected areas than outside, whereas the opposite is true for species of least concern and Near Threatened species. We also found significant population increases in protected areas classified as category III and significant population decreases in protected and unprotected areas throughout Oceania. Our results demonstrate that terrestrial protected areas can be an important approach for mammalian recovery and conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1306
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Higher fish biomass inside than outside marine protected areas despite typhoon impacts in a complex reefscape
    McClure, Eva C.
    Sievers, Katherine T.
    Abesamis, Rene A.
    Hoey, Andrew S.
    Alcala, Angel C.
    Russ, Garry R.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 241
  • [32] Seasonal dynamics of avian guilds inside and outside core protected areas in an Andean Biosphere Reserve of southern Chile
    Tomas Ibarra, Jose
    Galvez, Nicolas
    Altamirano, Tomas A.
    Caviedes, Julian
    Rojas, Isabel M.
    Bonacic, Cristian
    Martin, Kathy
    BIRD STUDY, 2017, 64 (03) : 410 - 420
  • [33] Forest mammal roadkills as related to habitat connectivity in protected areas
    Wanmo Kang
    Emily S. Minor
    Donggul Woo
    Dowon Lee
    Chan-Ryul Park
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016, 25 : 2673 - 2686
  • [34] Distribution and mammal fauna composition in protected areas of Saint Petersburg
    Bublichenko, Andrew G.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF THERIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01): : 45 - 52
  • [35] Large mammal population declines in Africa's protected areas
    Craigie, Ian D.
    Baillie, Jonathan E. M.
    Balmford, Andrew
    Carbone, Chris
    Collen, Ben
    Green, Rhys E.
    Hutton, Jon M.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (09) : 2221 - 2228
  • [36] Forest mammal roadkills as related to habitat connectivity in protected areas
    Kang, Wanmo
    Minor, Emily S.
    Woo, Donggul
    Lee, Dowon
    Park, Chan-Ryul
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 25 (13) : 2673 - 2686
  • [37] Comparing access to US marine and terrestrial protected areas
    Anna Lou Abatayo
    Madelon van Adrichem
    John Lynham
    Nature Sustainability, 2024, 7 : 255 - 259
  • [38] Insufficient climate connectivity among terrestrial protected areas
    McKay, Alexa
    NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (06) : 357 - 357
  • [39] Comparing access to US marine and terrestrial protected areas
    Abatayo, Anna Lou
    van Adrichem, Madelon
    Lynham, John
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 7 (03) : 255 - 259
  • [40] The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Lobo, Jorge M.
    Moreno, Juan C.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2007, 21 (06) : 1423 - 1432