Mammal recovery inside and outside terrestrial protected areas

被引:0
|
作者
Magoulick, Katherine M. [1 ]
Hull, Vanessa [2 ]
Liu, Jianguo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Integrat Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biomes; IUCN red list; Mammal populations; Remoteness; Terrestrial protected areas; PACIFIC ISLANDS; EXTINCTION RISK; HABITAT LOSS; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; DEFORESTATION; WILDLIFE; BIASES; LAND; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-024-02014-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Protected areas are a key component of global conservation, and the world is aiming to increase protected areas to cover 30% of land and water through the 30 x 30 Initiative under the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. However, factors affecting their success or failure in regard to promoting mammal population recovery are not well studied, particularly using quantitative approaches comparing across diverse taxa, biomes, and countries. To better understand how protected areas contribute to mammalian recovery, we conducted an analysis of 2706 mammal populations both inside and outside of protected areas worldwide. We calculated the annual percent change of mammal populations within and outside of terrestrial protected areas and examined the relationship between the percent change and a suite of human and natural characteristics including biome, region, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) protected area category, IUCN Red List classification, and taxonomic order. Our results show that overall mammal populations inside and outside of protected areas are relatively stable. It appears that Threatened mammals are doing better inside of protected areas than outside, whereas the opposite is true for species of least concern and Near Threatened species. We also found significant population increases in protected areas classified as category III and significant population decreases in protected and unprotected areas throughout Oceania. Our results demonstrate that terrestrial protected areas can be an important approach for mammalian recovery and conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1306
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Distribution of avian scavengers inside and outside of protected areas: contrasting patterns between two areas of Spain and South Africa
    Marcos Moleón
    Ainara Cortés-Avizanda
    Juan M. Pérez-García
    Jesús Bautista
    Claire Geoghegan
    Martina Carrete
    Arjun Amar
    José A. Sánchez-Zapata
    José A. Donázar
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2020, 29 : 3349 - 3368
  • [22] Coral reef diversity and health inside and outside marine protected areas in Little Cayman, Cayman Islands
    Tyminski, WP
    Garcia, J
    Sosa, TA
    Ziegler, D
    Okeefe, AJ
    Allshouse, ME
    Coelho, VR
    Manfrino, C
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) : 1019 - 1019
  • [23] Community assemblages of commercially important coral reef fishes inside and outside marine protected areas in the Philippines
    Muallil, Richard N.
    Deocadez, Melchor R.
    Martinez, Renmar Jun S.
    Mamauag, Samuel S.
    Nanola, Cleto L., Jr.
    Alino, Porfirio M.
    REGIONAL STUDIES IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2015, 1 : 47 - 54
  • [24] Data on the biomass of commercially important coral reef fishes inside and outside marine protected areas in the Philippines
    Muallil, Richard N.
    Deocadez, Melchor R.
    Martinez, Renmar Jun S.
    Alino, Porfirio M.
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2019, 25
  • [25] Trophic ecology of the gopher rockfish Sebastes carnatus inside and outside of central California marine protected areas
    Loury, Erin K.
    Bros, Shannon M.
    Starr, Richard M.
    Ebert, David A.
    Cailliet, Gregor M.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2015, 536 : 229 - 241
  • [26] Status of tigers outside the protected areas in Mizoram
    Ind Forester, 10 (1031-1034):
  • [27] Extent of the Global Network of Terrestrial Protected Areas
    Soutullo, Alvaro
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 362 - 363
  • [28] Conservation and monitoring of invertebrates in terrestrial protected areas
    McGeoch, Melodie A.
    Sithole, Hendrik
    Samways, Michael J.
    Simaika, John P.
    Pryke, James S.
    Picker, Mike
    Uys, Charmaine
    Armstrong, Adrian J.
    Dippenaar-Schoeman, Ansie S.
    Engelbrecht, Ian A.
    Braschler, Brigitte
    Hamer, Michelle
    KOEDOE, 2011, 53 (02):
  • [29] Fish assemblages inside and outside marine protected areas off northern Iceland: protection effects or environmental confounds?
    Jaworski, Andrzej
    Solmundsson, Jon
    Ragnarsson, Stefan Aki
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2010, 102 (1-2) : 50 - 59
  • [30] Plant invasion risk inside and outside protected areas: Propagule pressure, abiotic and biotic factors definitively matter
    Lozano, Vanessa
    Di Febbraro, Mirko
    Brundu, Giuseppe
    Carranza, Maria Laura
    Alessandrini, Alessandro
    Ardenghi, Nicola Maria Giuseppe
    Barni, Elena
    Bedini, Gianni
    Celesti-Grapow, Laura
    Cianfaglione, Kevin
    Cogoni, Annalena
    Domina, Gianniantonio
    Fascetti, Simonetta
    Ferretti, Giulio
    Foggi, Bruno
    Iberite, Mauro
    Lastrucci, Lorenzo
    Lazzaro, Lorenzo
    Mainetti, Andrea
    Marinangeli, Francesca
    Montagnani, Chiara
    Musarella, Carmelo Maria
    Orsenigo, Simone
    Peccenini, Simonetta
    Peruzzi, Lorenzo
    Poggio, Laura
    Proietti, Chiara
    Prosser, Filippo
    Ranfa, Aldo
    Rosati, Leonardo
    Santangelo, Annalisa
    Selvaggi, Alberto
    Spampinato, Giovanni
    Stinca, Adriano
    Vacca, Gabriella
    Villani, Mariacristina
    Siniscalco, Consolata
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 877